Skip to comments.
AOL MAY DEMAND REFUND FOR PEEP SHOW
New York Post ^
| 2/03/04
| STEPHEN LYNCH
Posted on 02/03/2004 12:39:09 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
February 3, 2004 -- After paying for a halftime show - and instead getting a peep show - AOL may demand some of its money back. The Super Bowl was supposed to be AOL's chance to shine - the first salvo in its new $200 million advertising campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advertising; aol; nipplegate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
02/03/2004 12:39:09 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Aren't these companies all owned by the same parent company???
What a joke.
2
posted on
02/03/2004 12:43:01 AM PST
by
Gerasimov
(My last tag line sucked, so now I have this one.)
To: kattracks
"While AOL was the sponsor of the Super Bowl Halftime Show, we did not produce it"
While Hamas was the sponsor of the suicide bombing, we did not produce it.
3
posted on
02/03/2004 12:43:22 AM PST
by
Fenris6
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
Her stunt prevented AOL from streaming the halftime show online, which was part of its original deal. she didn't show her breast till the very last seconds of the show
So how did this stop AOL from streaming the halftime show online??
5
posted on
02/03/2004 12:51:35 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Mo1
Uh... you weren't supposed to notice that.
7
posted on
02/03/2004 1:03:32 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Ooops .. sorry
8
posted on
02/03/2004 1:05:04 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: kattracks
Instead, its $10 million sponsorship of the halftime show and numerous commercial spots turned into a disaster because of Janet Jackson's inability to keep her clothes on, analysts said. AOL's numerous commercial spots came a cropper because they were boring and stupid. Ms. Jackson's exposed mammary gland had nothing to do with that.
9
posted on
02/03/2004 1:13:20 AM PST
by
Johnny_Cipher
(HAS YOUR TAGLINE BEEN BLESSED TODAY? Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com)
aol should get their money back.
all they ever did was run ads with the stars of a show that features women wrestling in spaghetti
To: YadaYadaYada; Fenris6; Yehuda; dennisw; Alouette; dighton; aculeus; hellinahandcart
Spare this site the ever persistant inclusion of Israel in every damn thread on this site. It's rather sickening as many threads like this have not a freaking thing to do with Israel, yet many of Jewish background make sure they interfere with non-Jewish articles. The other alternative would be to request from Jim Robinson that he advertises this site as a Jewish Conservative site so that others may know beforehand. The persistant whining grows thin on many. Zionist interference bump.
To: kattracks
I'll believe AOL cares about providing family-safe internetting when it dumps its rap radio channel. My co-worker plays it and it is filled with the most vile filth you could imagine, with the worst lines repeated ad nauseum.
Otherwise, I'd believe the SB halftime show is nothing but an extension of what they already offer - boob and all.
12
posted on
02/03/2004 1:46:22 AM PST
by
Tall_Texan
(Some day I'll have a rock-hard body - once rigor mortis sets in.)
To: YadaYadaYada
"Spare this site the ever persistant inclusion of Israel in every damn thread on this site."
LOL. I'm Methodist not Jewish (and not fond of the few I know). I made the analogy to highlight AOLs cowardly attempt to avoid any responsibility as a sponsor.
Sorry dude, but Hamas was the first thing that came to my mind. Perhaps your perceived "persistant inclusion" is a reflection of your own hyper-sensitivity re all things Israeli. ;)
13
posted on
02/03/2004 1:47:31 AM PST
by
Fenris6
To: Tall_Texan
I'll believe AOL cares about providing family-safe internetting when it dumps its rap radio channel.Not to mention that for the longest time, AOL looked the other way when their chat rooms were being used to distribute kiddie porn.
To: Gerasimov
Didn't AOL know it was being produced by MTV? Surely they had an idea what they were sponsoring.
15
posted on
02/03/2004 3:05:20 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Dante3
AOL knows one thing, sex sells.
16
posted on
02/03/2004 3:28:11 AM PST
by
TYVets
("An armed society is a polite society." - Robert A. Heinlein & me)
To: TYVets
When sex sells the STDs are rampant - MTV gave AOL, CBS, Viacom and the NFL a nice dose of herpes.
17
posted on
02/03/2004 3:50:16 AM PST
by
Fenris6
To: YadaYadaYada
The other alternative would be to request from Jim Robinson that he advertises this site as a Jewish Conservative site so that others may know beforehand. Why don't you make the request?
I'm sure Jim Robinson will make some accomodation or other for you.
To: kattracks
AOL is acting like a criminal who got mugged.
19
posted on
02/03/2004 4:18:45 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
To: Fenris6
Once the conservative outrage dies down, the NFL won't mind it at all.
20
posted on
02/03/2004 4:27:28 AM PST
by
TYVets
("An armed society is a polite society." - Robert A. Heinlein & me)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson