Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS JUGHEADS
New York Post ^ | 2/02/04 | DON KAPLAN

Posted on 02/04/2004 12:42:15 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

February 4, 2004 -- After a day of crisis talks, CBS yesterday agreed to let Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake remain on this Sunday's Grammy telecast - but said it was working on new technology to censor any "inappropriate and unexpected events." The network, which has been under tremendous pressure to dump Jackson and Timberlake after their X-rated halftime antics at the Boob Bowl, said the new system was insurance against an encore performance.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; fcc; grammys; janetjackson; lyingliars; mtv; nipplegate; seebs; superbowl; viacom; viacommie
Not only do they offend our sensibilities, they also insult our intelligence.
1 posted on 02/04/2004 12:42:15 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"internal investigation" my arse. These peeps must really think Americans are dumb - oh wait - check out their audience. Sigh.
2 posted on 02/04/2004 12:52:14 AM PST by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The article title is hilarious, if thought about in a certain way. {:>)
3 posted on 02/04/2004 12:53:49 AM PST by DeepDish (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
>>>The article title is hilarious, if thought about in a certain way

Especially that headline...
4 posted on 02/04/2004 12:56:15 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6
SeeBS may have forgotten that the Super Bowl audience wasn't their usual group, and as such have more than one working brain cell.
5 posted on 02/04/2004 12:57:58 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
The Post has a "way" with headlines.
6 posted on 02/04/2004 12:58:44 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
Well if you consider what Janet popped out " a Jug" you have a point.
7 posted on 02/04/2004 1:00:55 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Did any logical human on Earth ever think that CBS would
not have those two (Jackson & Timberlake) on the Grammy bcst?

The brass at CBS would all appear naked on Face The Nation
rather than lose the publicity generated by that boob shot.
8 posted on 02/04/2004 1:02:20 AM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Punk'd. Hmmmm. I remember my daddy calling my brother on the carpet for using the word "punk". We didn't know the real meaning. Now executives use it and it's the name of a TV show. My how things have changed. Someday a boob will just be a boob .......

and a teat will just be a teat.
9 posted on 02/04/2004 1:05:15 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In the old days of television, anything that even approached this type of an incident would have resulted in a cut to a commercial and a ban/blacklist in the industry for the entertainer who pulled the stunt ("you'll never work in this town again").
10 posted on 02/04/2004 1:12:01 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Notice how no one at SeeBS has addressed the outrage of the flag that had the center cut so it could be used as a poncho. There also has been no discussion of all the crotch grabbing (even Michael Jackson caught flak for such moves in a video where he did that years ago).
11 posted on 02/04/2004 1:13:48 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DeepDish
Not a word about Archie, Veronica or Betty. Damn...(/sarcasm)

Red

12 posted on 02/04/2004 1:13:52 AM PST by Conservative4Ever (Last year I was conceited.........this year I'm perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
CBS will not do the right thing by banning these two clowns because there would be a Hollyweird boycott of the event in solidarity under the guise of protecting the 1st Amendment. Principle sold down the river.
13 posted on 02/04/2004 1:19:30 AM PST by Young Rhino (http://www.artofdivorce.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Not only do they offend our sensibilities, they also insult our intelligence.

BTTT
14 posted on 02/04/2004 1:27:57 AM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Rhino
Baloney. They are manipulating. They want the shock value of having the two abusers appear.

CBS just can't seem to get a handle on the fact that it is entertainment that we want to see - not shock.

So - they deal only in shock. They have no ability to entertain.
15 posted on 02/04/2004 2:07:54 AM PST by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Seems to me that Janet ought to show up at the grammy's wearing the same outfit, just so she can demonstrate what she thought was going to happen.
16 posted on 02/04/2004 2:25:48 AM PST by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson