Janet Let the Dogs Out

Original ^ | Feb. 4, 2004 | IronJack

[N. Theknow]

Huh? That site is for a local radio show. Scroll down some.

I did scroll down. I am referring to that thing on her chest that makes her look like she should be working for Marshall Dillon.

[gitmo]

Here's the difference: if you go to MTV, VH1, Playboy, or an internet porn site, you know what you're going to see. But this is a show purported to be clean and wholesome, and parents encourage their children to watch.

Nudity at the bank, at church, on Sesame Street, on the Superbowl, and in the State of the Union speech is criminal.

[farmfriend]

I have re-looked at the picture I have and I believe you are correct. I missed it the first time. My apologies.

[roadcat]

Piercing? It wasn't pierced.

Yes it was. See post 14 by farmfriend. There are also articles where Janet stated she has piercing parties to show off their "art"-work. She also has piercings in other places, including some below the waistline (we don't want to see those!).

[The Coopster]

No need to apologize. In fact, I should probably apologize to you for making you look again.......

[mel]

Looks like one of those tops for breast feeding, you know just whip it out.

[farmfriend]

See post 14 by farmfriend.

Telling me to look at my own post. That is rich. As you will see in a later post, I admit that I missed the pierced part the first time around.

[IronJack]

But this is a show purported to be clean and wholesome,

I'm not sure I'd agree with that ...

But in any case, there are a thousand other venues purported to be wholesome entertainment that are nothing more than fiber-optic peep shows. This is just one more ...

[Hand em their arse]

Ya know what the shame of all of this is? And don't get me wrong, I'm as big a fan of Janet's boobs as the next guy but that had to be one of the greatest Super Bowl games in history and it's hardly even a blip anymore.

It really is a shame :(

[freedox]

IronJack, your ability to hit the nail dead on the head continues to astound me. Here.......let me go back and find my favorite line......

"The grossest offense is that the media elitists who concoct such rubbish thought so little of me as to think this chintzy, flashpot-spangled grind would entertain me."

Thank you.

[IronJack]

Hey, free. I trust you weren't any more "entertained" by that spectacle than I was.

[farmfriend]

I did enjoy the game. I was glued to it and that is the first time in a few years. Usually I watch for the commercials.

[Hand em their arse]

Yeah, I'm with ya! The kids with the soap in their mouths nearly had me pee in my pants...

[Paul_B]

Well-written, but I disagree. We need to get mad at both the general degeneration and this latest particular outrage. Unfortunately it often takes a prominent transgression like this to focus and motivate a somnolent public. And it's an opportunity we dare not let pass, or we will slip into further desensitization. The enemy has made a mistake, by going too far too fast. Maybe it will cause the frog in the pot to realize that the water is getting dangerously hot.

[stevem]

I read or heard somewhere that ER is planning Janet: The Sequel on Thursday night. Or perhaps it is to be Janet: The War of the Years since it's supposed to be a much more mature exposure on ER.

If we are going to do this, it seems to me there ought to be more exposure of a larger variety of (what have we?) melons; that is, more of a broad spectrum. For example, the article talks of broad coverage on Cosmo in the check-out lines. I always thought it more appealing to see the larger version that prevails on the covers of Cosmo, even if we need to look to some Jenny Craig "before" models. The point is, if we plan to be fair we need to expose all shapes and sizes and have an on-line poll so we can keep abreast of the most up to date American preferences.

Since Janet only exposed the one, we need to get the National Enquirer investigative reporters on the trail. For now we can only speculate. Enquiring minds want to know. Does Janet have a complete set of pins?

What have we, the NFL, ER, prime time TV...they don't call it the boob tube for nothing.

[IronJack]

We need to get mad at ALL of it! And we've needed to get mad long, long before this.

[IronJack]

I was raised without a tv and still don't have one.

I often rue the day we got our first one ...

[Lijahsbubbe]

Well-written, but I disagree. We need to get mad at both the general degeneration and this latest particular outrage. Unfortunately it often takes a prominent transgression like this to focus and motivate a somnolent public. And it's an opportunity we dare not let pass, or we will slip into further desensitization. The enemy has made a mistake, by going too far too fast. Maybe it will cause the frog in the pot to realize that the water is getting dangerously hot.

Thanks for saying what I wanted to! Well said.

[an amused spectator]

IronJack bump