Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Hidden treasures of Saxon burial chamber revealed (photos)
BBC On-Line ^ | Thursday, 5 February, 2004 | staff writer

Posted on 02/09/2004 4:25:46 PM PST by yankeedame

Last Updated: Thursday, 5 February, 2004, 13:09 GMT

Burial chamber's secrets revealed

More details are being released of a Saxon burial chamber unearthed in Essex.

The 12-feet-wide, five-feet-high wood-lined chamber - dating from the 7th Century - was crammed with gold coins and ornaments.

But the remains of the ancient king have dissolved and experts have not yet been able to identify him.

The find in Prittlewell, Southend, is being hailed as a major discovery.

Some experts have likened the discovery to the find in 1939 of a Saxon burial ship in Sutton Hoo in Suffolk, one of Britain's most important archaeological sites.

The find in Prittlewell, Southend, is being hailed as a major discovery.

> Hidden treasures of Saxon burial chamber


"An artist's impression of the inside of a Saxon king's burial chamber found in Southend, Essex. Experts say it gives a glimpse into the lives of the super-rich of the Dark Ages"


The site was filled with everything a king needed in the afterlife, from his sword and shield to copper bowls, glass vessels and treasures


Two pairs of coloured glass vessels were found by archaeologists from the Museum of London Archaeology Service


A gold coin found during the excavation dates back to the 6th or 7th century


Inside the chamber, which would have been lined with wood, were two tiny gold foil crosses about 30mm in length


A gold belt buckle dating from about 600-640


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: beowulf; essex; godsgravesglyphs; kingofbling; kingsaeberht; kingsigebertii; lyre; prittlewell; southend; suttonhoo; venerablebede
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2004 4:25:47 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Wow! Thanks for posting this. I can't wait to read the full report. I'd love to be a part of such a dig!
2 posted on 02/09/2004 4:30:52 PM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
a glimpse into the lives of the super-rich of the Dark Ages"

Don't tell John Edwards - he'll jump into his wayback machine and go tax them.

3 posted on 02/09/2004 4:31:04 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; farmfriend
*ping*
4 posted on 02/09/2004 4:31:37 PM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
How did the moonspinners miss it?
5 posted on 02/09/2004 4:38:24 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame; EggsAckley; blam
A few years ago I saw an exhibit of treasures from Antioch....from the 5-7th centuries AD...and only excavated in the mid-20th century. This exhibit also included glass items, and that such fragile items should survive earthquakes - in the case of Antioch - and centuries underground amazes me.
6 posted on 02/09/2004 4:38:29 PM PST by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
Truly amazing!
7 posted on 02/09/2004 4:39:41 PM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
Seventh century....was that around the time of King Arthur?
8 posted on 02/09/2004 4:39:57 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Arthur was British and would have been fighting the Saxons. That would have been a couple centuries before this Saxon lived.
9 posted on 02/09/2004 4:44:34 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"Seventh century....was that around the time of King Arthur?"

King Arthur (If there even was one) was believed to have died somewhere between 530-572AD, depends on who's talking.

10 posted on 02/09/2004 4:49:56 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; blam
Thank you both for your replies concerning the legendary Arthur Pendragon.
11 posted on 02/09/2004 4:51:35 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Wa la wa! Ic þu axige föh ne mïn hordes!

(O Alas! I ask you to not take my treasures!)

12 posted on 02/09/2004 5:55:46 PM PST by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Soþlice! [Truly!] See, all those years of Anglo-Saxon and Old Icelandic paid off...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

13 posted on 02/09/2004 6:00:24 PM PST by BushMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xJones
One account I read was that the Thames valley was one of the last areas of Southeast England to fall to the Anglo-Saxons, and that Arthur's Camelot was the Essex city of Colchester, known to the Romans as "Camelodunum". That would have predated the kingdom of the East Saxons in Essex, however.
14 posted on 02/09/2004 6:17:57 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
After 1,400-plus years, the belt buckle design still hasn't been improved upon.
15 posted on 02/09/2004 6:18:32 PM PST by AngrySpud (Behold, I am The Anti-Crust ... Anti-Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingchick
Cool Saxon Archeological Dig Pics!
16 posted on 02/09/2004 6:21:49 PM PST by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
A simple beauty that is timeless that has.
17 posted on 02/09/2004 6:25:33 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
Very cool!
18 posted on 02/09/2004 6:32:33 PM PST by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
After 1,400-plus years, the belt buckle design still hasn't been improved upon.

Don't say that out loud here in Texas! We have a whole mess of fine looking better-designed belt buckles around the waist of every blue-jean-wearing Texan.


19 posted on 02/09/2004 6:35:31 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BushMeister
Uh, what does the red X mean?

*grin*

20 posted on 02/09/2004 6:37:26 PM PST by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Soþlice! [Truly!] See, all those years of Anglo-Saxon and Old Icelandic paid off...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson