[rmgb]

I remember WorldNetDaily as being fiercely in favour of the war against Iraq?

It is a strange world: European and US leftists start endorsing the CIA and Tenet (may I say so much without my thread being pulled?), US conservatives start endorsing Ritter.

Against whom are they uniting? Anybody's guess.

[EggsAckley]

It is VERY weird.

[MamaLucci]

The only thing that explains Ritters 180 degree turn on the state of Iraq's weapons program is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

[VRWCmember]

Calling Major Ritter

We're sorry, the person you are calling is not available right now. (He's busy tending to his defense against charges of soliciting an underage girl for sexual favors at a Burger King.) Please leave a message and he'll return your call in 5 to 10 years.

[demlosers]

Like it or not, Maj. Scott Ritter had it right all along.

Yeah suuuure...

[Homer1]

Scott Ritter was on the take from Saddam

[anniegetyourgun]

I've come to trust Col. Hackworth as much as I do Maj. Ritter.

[fishtank]

What the hay, Hack???

You mean to tell me that if the local crack house was given a 24 hour heads-up to flush the drugs down the toilet, you don't think they were selling narcotics there???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Of course we can't find the WMDs

---

Saddam had about ten years to hide them.

DORKS in the media.
DORKS in politics.

I guess the metrosexual-fashionable thing to do now is take down George W. Bush with your poison pen.

[Bikers4Bush]

Ritter is a pedophile. Nothing a pedophile ever says should be believed.

[martin_fierro]

Yawn. More Hackworth self-promotion.

In other words, "Those flat-Earth believers were actually correct, because from where they stood the Earth really was flat."

[CROSSHIGHWAYMAN]

Ritter, the United Nations' chief weapons inspector in Iraq until 1998, took us all on – virtually alone, against incredible odds – stating, "Iraq is not a threat to the U.S." and begging the American people to take charge and not "sit back and allow your government to go to war against Iraq ...

Kerry/Ritter

[kellynla]

There is only one question that has to be answered. Is Iraq, the middle east, the United States and the rest of the world better off today with Saddam removed from power or not? Hack and the rest of the naysayers fail to inform everyone that the WMD that we are talking about could be stored in anyone's two-car garage in a country the size of California. And if Saddam did not have the WMD and the means to produce them on very short notice why would he refuse to reveal them or lack of rather than have his country invaded and himself removed. I don't know about "Hack" but I feel a heck of a lot better with Saddam removed than not. Of course for those who don't already know this, "Hack" was against us going to Iraq in the first place. This article, I believe, is nothing more than sour milk. Semper Fi, Kelly

[Always Right]

Ritter, the United Nations' chief weapons inspector in Iraq until 1998, took us all on – virtually alone, against incredible odds – stating, "Iraq is not a threat to the U.S." and begging the American people to take charge and not "sit back and allow your government to go to war against Iraq ...

Bush did not say Iraq was a threat to the US, Bush wanted to act before Iraq became a threat to the US. Bush also wanted to enforce the peace agreement and the UN resolutions. Bush wanted to rid the Iraqi people of a ruthless dictator who killed his people and supported terrorists. The war was not about an imminent threat from WMD. The war was about the larger war on terrorism. Don't let the terrorist-loving american-hating liberals redefine the war.

[TexasCajun]

Johnny Cash Hackworthless & Ritter make a great team!

Maybe Worthless can get Ritter to find him a 13 yr old date off the internet. That is what Ritter does best, huh?

[chichipow]

WND has turned down a strange road. Sperry's 'Bush Lied' article and this one may be two of many.

[elli1]

Col Hackworth ignores discussion of the falling dominoes because Bush & Blair didn't back down over Iraq...Khadafy would still be building his bomb, Khan in Pakistan would still be operating his mail-order bomb business, Assad would be sleeping more easily, the base in Qatar might not be established & the troop withdrawals from Saudi might not be happening (and more barracks there being bombed), al Qaeda might be operating unfettered out of Baghdad, and the Good Guys wouldn't have a landing strip in Iraq to keep the heat turned up on Iran, Libya, Syria.... The entire Mediterranean would have soon been a boiling cauldron; no ships would have been safe and North Korea would still have all those good customers in the ME. Who wants to predict the price of gasoline in ten years under that scenario?

[camas]

WMD; how about the tons of high (and low) explosives that keep blowing up and killing people?? they were not found and i bet there are tons more laying around. i will also bet there are tons of WMDs hiding in Iraq. no, they are not in the places where they should be. suggest looking for them in spider holes made for WMDs.

[piasa]

Things You Have to Believe to Think that Iraq Has No WMD at post #46

And I'm not even getting into the really heavy stuff there. I could go on...

[avg_freeper]

Isn't it amazing how a poor, humble, pedophile can work hard and finally make something out of him self in America?

The news media must be proud.

[Moby Grape]

Calling Major Hackworth.....Scott Ritter was RIGHT? Ritter said there was no way the US could win a war in Iraq.....a slight misjudgment.

[petercooper]

I still think Bush and Rove are setting a trap for all these dumb mother f's who keep crying about the wmd's.

They will be found. It's not time yet.

Patience, politics is chess.