[The_Eaglet]

Thanks for posting this. This really isn't a challenge to Roe v. Wade as Roe v. Wade was technically binding only on the parties at suit.

Pray that South Dakota's right to defend the right to life will not be attacked by the Constitution-usurping left.

[sheltonmac]

Thanks for the ping. I was wondering how long it would be before a state dared to question the federal government's immoral and unconstitutional mandate on this issue. Let's hope and pray this is only the beginning.

[Cobra Scott]

Actually, I've always felt that RvW was a good tool to outlaw abortions. It draws the line at the third trimester. Combined with this sort of reasoning, ie: an update of scientific reason within the statute, the two together are constitutional and could prohibit abortion much earlier.

Like in the 2nd trimester. Or in the first 30 days. Or the first 30 minutes. After all, this is an issue of citizenship, something the left whines about ad nauseum. RoevWade is not a good solid position for the abortionists, for so many reasons, and this is one.