The media lies.
1 posted on
02/11/2004 10:22:35 AM PST by
Hon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: All
Tom Lipscomb is slated to be on Fox News with John Gibson today to talk about this article and the way the media has misrepresented the story in general.
2 posted on
02/11/2004 10:26:17 AM PST by
Hon
To: Hon
Media failed to find facts behind Bush's service record As if they bothered to look.
3 posted on
02/11/2004 10:28:19 AM PST by
Doomonyou
To: Hon
bump
To: Hon
Liberofascist lies. Journalists suck.
6 posted on
02/11/2004 10:29:13 AM PST by
TheGeezer
To: Hon
The liberals and the liberal media have overplayed their hand on this badly. Pure and simple, there is no legitimate issue here. Now President Bush actually gets a sympathy wave from being attacked so viciously over a non-issue.
Just more poor judgment from the liberals - do we really want them deciding issues of war and peace? I sure don't.
To: Hon
Still, the media did a much better job this time than it ever did on examining Willie's 63 days of indoctrination training in Moscow, how much he received of Saddam's oil voucher money, or the real amount he received for Rich's pardon. After so many years of the media accepting as absolute fact what they were told by the White House, it is good to see that they are finally asking questions. Maybe, they will one day get it right.
8 posted on
02/11/2004 10:29:50 AM PST by
Tacis
To: Hon
Well, yeah, but let's keep digging until we uncover the facts, okay? [/sarcasm]
9 posted on
02/11/2004 10:31:18 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(The only reason I don't question Kerry's patriotism is because I know it doesn't exist.)
To: Hon
The media lies. "No s**t, Sherlock!"
- Capt. Bart Mancuso, USS Dallas
10 posted on
02/11/2004 10:31:32 AM PST by
RebelBanker
(Negotiate? [BANG] Anybody else want to negotiate?)
To: Hon
There was already an exhaustive look at Bush's National Guard records published and available on the Internet to any reporter who has written on this in the last week. None of whom bothered to look it up. It's title? "The Real Military Record of George W. Bush: Not Heroic, But Not AWOL, Either." It was "the first full chronology" and concludes "he did accumulate the days of service required of him for his ultimate honorable discharge." And BTW, the source of that article was none of the JFK Jr's George Magazine.
To: Hon
It has never been about what the media can find, or prove.
The goal has always been to talk, and talk, and talk so much that it begins to sway public opinion. Remember the Clintons and the mantra his cronies had in the days of the Cigargate scandal?
The media is no different. Very little of the major news media is about reporting news anymore, but it is primarily concerned with editorializing to the point that people will believe whatever they tell them.
To: Hon
There may be nothing to this but a friend of mine knows a guy who served with Kerry in Viet Nam. The guy my friend knows, says that Kerry frequently shot farm animals belonging to innocent villagers. He also said that Kerry ran away like a scalded dog any time enemy fire was encountered.
This story is more believable than the "Bush was AWOL" story. I wonder if the media will research this or tout it as fact.
CG
19 posted on
02/11/2004 10:39:23 AM PST by
Conspiracy Guy
(It's a little cool in the house. Do you turn up the heat, or put on more clothing?)
To: Hon
INTREP - VNVAJK
To: Hon
What is the old saying? "A lie gets two laps around the field before truth can get out of the gate."
To: Hon
23 posted on
02/11/2004 10:40:46 AM PST by
1066AD
To: Hon
Whatever Bush's history, there is one presidential candidate who the communist North Vietnamese credited with helping them to defeat the United States. And it wasn't Bush.
Don't you think that if we had a patriotic press that this would be pointed out?
24 posted on
02/11/2004 10:41:09 AM PST by
axel f
To: Hon
No AWOL in Alabama. Yet another intelligence failure from the Liberals. And they want to be in charge of national security?
27 posted on
02/11/2004 10:46:23 AM PST by
kevao
To: Hon
It is more than a lie, it is the deliberate effort to assassinate the character of the president.
30 posted on
02/11/2004 10:49:11 AM PST by
Kirkwood
To: Hon
And Kerry doesn't have "the answer" because he is taking advantage of a partisan political fantasy that has stayed aloft this long because of the lousy job done by the press in reporting on it.The press isn't doing a lousy job. It's doing exactly what it's supposed to do, slam President Bush.
To: Hon
And Kerry doesn't have "the answer" because he is taking advantage of a partisan political fantasy that has stayed aloft this long because of the lousy job done by the press in reporting on it. The media isn't interested in the truth. Just the dogfight. Witness yesterdays pack of jackals in the WH press corp. What are they going to talk about? Kerry's long list of non-exsistant legislative achievements?
To: Hon
Media failed to find facts behind Bush's service record...
THEY DIDN'T FAIL THEY DIDN'T WANT TO FIND THE FACTS
...stayed aloft this long because of the lousy job done by the press in reporting on it...
Not a lousy job at all for a deliberate political smear begun by the DNC and carried "aloft" by their shills in the so-called mainstream media.
37 posted on
02/11/2004 10:54:36 AM PST by
Wolfstar
(A cowboy nation or a Kerrified nation. Your choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson