Posted on 02/16/2004 8:16:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Forget the current hullabaloo regarding the thirty some odd year old service records of the two candidates and all the other hysterical, hypocritical, hyperbolic horse hockey being raised by the Democrats and their operatives.
Here's the commonsense bottom line of what the coming election is about:
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to surrender our national sovereignty, our national security and our national defense to the United Nations and other so-called world government bodies. The Democrats do not believe that war is sometimes necessary to defend the nation and or our national interests. The Democrats do not believe that the United States has the right to self-defense. The Democrats do not care about our national security or defending our national sovereignty. It's not in their game plan. In fact their game plan includes acquiescing to the United Nations, a world court and a world government. There's absolutely no doubt about it. It's in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to increase our taxes and continue increasing our taxes until they totally destroy our economy and our ability to compete in world markets. Bush is a sworn tax cutter. Kerry is a sworn tax raiser. No doubt about it. It's in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to kiss off our traditional man/woman marriage and from this point on it'll be anything goes. Bush defends traditional family values and a moral society. Kerry promotes the feminist/abortionist/homosexualist agenda, no matter how absurd, perverse, abhorrent or evil. No doubt about it. It's in the record.
Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to appoint and confirm nothing but NOW/NAMBLA/Globalist approved feminist/abortionist/homosexualist liberal activist judges. Bush will appoint judges who will abide by the Constitution. Kerry and the Democrats will appoint and confirm only liberal activist judges. Allow this and we can kiss our Constitution and what's left of our national sovereignty and freedom goodbye. No doubt about it. It's in the record. Period. End of story.
Perhaps I am confused,but I damn sure know that using DNC rhetoric is a major red flag for me.
Cordially,
We either all work, tirelessly, to get President Bush reelected, or we'll get stuck with Kerry/a Dem.
Holy cow. Don't you think you're over-reacting just a little? I don't wet my pants when RATS engage in scare tactics and I sure as hell won't when a Republican does.
I do not want a future where we have to worry about terrorists bombers in any setting that has a group of people together whether they be old, young, rich, poor, straight, homosexual, black, brown, white, or with polka dots. We have an enemy that wants us destroyed and until they are no longer a threat, everything else is second place.
Well, even President Bush acknowledges that this threat will be with us for a long time.
Cordially,
As a homeowner, I've taken steps toward keeping my house secure: the dog, good lighting, and guns. I could no-more imagine a Kerry-for-president than giving some committee down the street responsibility for securing my home .
We may, in the eyes of some, seem as infidels. But that is our right. Borrow and Spend vs. Tax and Spend means little when compared to removing the camel's nose (terrorism) from under the tent- with a steel-toed boot, preferably.
No can do. Judging by the replies this thread has generated so far you've got enough compadres who are willing allow themselves to be used as political whores. If I have to be the only person who has the guts to hold President Bush's feet to the fire, so be it. I'm up to the task.
"I agree. They shouldn't have to work their fingers to the bone to provide you with "free" Viagra while you spend your money sitting in front of the quarter slots all day drinking bloody marys. When I say "you" I mean it in a figurative sense. I am not referring to you personally, I am referring to your selfish, self-centered, self-absorbed, self-possessed neighbors"
You chose to set one group of people against another by age, just as the RATS set groups of people who are racially different, economically different, even of different genders. I've seen that argument before, and I know from where it comes.
I'm curious who you intend to vote for, whose "feet you can hold to the fire."
I notice you left out the part that you highlighted in your original reply to my post. As I said before, that was the part that was President Bush's exact words. I acknowledged that the other stuff was my own wording. Clearly he would not have the guts to say what I said about people being selfish and self-absorbed.
I may not vote for anybody. I refuse to allow myself to be used as a political whore. What you do is up to you. That's all I'm saying.
Just WHAT have YOU done, besides complain about the president on this site, to " hold his feet to the fire "? I and most of the others you hold in contempt, have actually done things, such as write snail mail, talked to higher ups in the GOP, and such,when we've disagreed with the president. Yet, you called us " POLITICAL WHORES "!
You, OTOH, are a one or two issue political naif.
What? Your fundamental right in a representative republic to vote....and you won't do it? Then you have no right to remark about anything as far as I'm concerned. If you have no intention of entering a voting booth and making a choice, you have no place making any remarks on a public forum about the matter.
Well, thank God it's not an either/or situation. President Bush defends both.
(sniffle, sniffle) You mean I'm not welcome here? You think I'm looking down my nose at you? You have self-esteem issues my friend.
Just WHAT have YOU done, besides complain about the president on this site, to " hold his feet to the fire "? I and most of the others you hold in contempt, have actually done things, such as write snail mail, talked to higher ups in the GOP, and such,when we've disagreed with the president.
Prove it. Let's see some of the letters you and most of the others have written and the responses they've generated.
Yet, you called us " POLITICAL WHORES "!
Wellllllll.....I never said you personally, but hey, if you aren't a political whore then being called one shouldn't bother you.
I've had all kinds of nasty things said to me on this thread and you don't see me throwing a hissy-fit. That's because I am secure in who I am and the beliefs I hold.
You, OTOH, are a one or two issue political naif.
Naif? Gee, isn't that what someone who looks down one's nose at another would say? You're opposed to all that looking down one's nose stuff ain'tcha?
I didn't say I won't, I said I may not. Pay attention and don't engage in hyperbole. Some people are opposed to that sort of thing.
Then you have no right to remark about anything as far as I'm concerned.
No offense but if rights were based on one's concerns than they wouldn't really be rights would they? And besides. Yes I do. The First Amendment doesn't say anything about having to vote in order to exercise Free Speech.
If you have no intention of entering a voting booth and making a choice, you have no place making any remarks on a public forum about the matter.
That's what you just said in the previous sentence but in a slightly different way.
LMAO Yep you have him dancing a jig with your one man political hot foot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.