Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Bush vs Kerry is really all about
Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/16/2004 8:16:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last
To: Fred Mertz
Ah, Fred. Are we published yet?
61 posted on 02/16/2004 8:45:36 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
BUSH BUMP! Jim, you have summed up all the reasons we must work as hard as we can to re-elect President Bush!


62 posted on 02/16/2004 8:45:36 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Great Post, Jim.

Not only is Pres. Bush a "sworn tax cutter", he is a "proven tax cutter"!
63 posted on 02/16/2004 8:47:04 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
bttt

Perfect.
64 posted on 02/16/2004 8:47:14 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump
65 posted on 02/16/2004 8:47:47 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Hi FairOpinion.....I am bogged down with the capitalistic endeavors of my life. Next week, I will be unavailable completely. But, I have some thoughts that I hope to share. I sincerely appreciate the pings.

Lando

66 posted on 02/16/2004 8:48:36 PM PST by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
In fact their game plan includes acquiescing to the United Nations, a world court and a world government. There's absolutely no doubt about it. It's in the record.

You're preaching to the choir Jim. ;^)

67 posted on 02/16/2004 8:49:05 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
bump
68 posted on 02/16/2004 8:49:17 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You have inspired me to make another contribution to Pres. Bush. Thank you.
69 posted on 02/16/2004 8:49:32 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
WOOHOO!!! Beautifully stated again, Jim... thank you for laying this out so simply and forcefully.

This election is a critical one in determining the path and preservation of America...


70 posted on 02/16/2004 8:50:59 PM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If I might add one thing on behalf of the opressed people in the world:

If John Kerry wins, you have "zero" chance of any meaningful improvement in your lives. You are destined for an era of meaningless UN resolutions, and continued terror. If you are Jewish, the US president will march lockstep with an organization that despises you.

You'd better hope the American people don't abandon you, because the democrats certainly will.

71 posted on 02/16/2004 8:50:59 PM PST by lawnguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
It's the beauty of our two-party system: each side must form a coalition BEFORE the election. More than anything, fear is what drives many people's decisions. At some point, it's so much how good your guy is, it's how bad the other guy is.

It's weird to be living through these times. Throughout the Cold War, both Dems and Repubs supported the effort against the USSR. How it got to the point where almost 50% of the electorate is seemingly ready to listen to the piper's claim that 9/11 should be treated as a police matter is beyond me.

72 posted on 02/16/2004 8:52:03 PM PST by Snerfling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."
--- Kerry, Inteview with Harvard Crimson, Feb. 18, 1970
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=352185


===


"We need a new approach to national security - a bold, progressive internationalism that stands in stark contrast to the too often belligerent and myopic unilateralism of the Bush Administration."

--- Kerry, Foreign Policy Speech
Georgetown University, Jan. 23, 2003
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/issues/kerr012303spfp.html



=====


"And in the first hundred days in office, I will go to the United Nations -- I will go in the first weeks -- and I will travel to our traditional allies to affirm that the United States of America has rejoined the community of nations. "

I will treat the United Nations as a full partner -- not as an obstruction to get by -- not only in the war on terror, but in combating other common enemies, like AIDS and global poverty. We must seek not only to renew the mandate of the U.N., but to reform its operations and revitalize its capacity. And if I am president, the United Nations will be seen as the asset that it is, not a liability to a safer America. "

--- Kerry, Speech at Center for Foreign Relations, Dec. 3, 2003
http://www.cfr.org/pub6576//making_america_secure_again_setting_the_right_course_for_foreign_policy.php



73 posted on 02/16/2004 8:52:28 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks for the succinct assessment of the situation. I am a Cheney fan but I would love to see the GOP do something to confuse and disarm the Dims... say...

BUSH/RICE 2004

BUSH/WATTS 2004

74 posted on 02/16/2004 8:52:48 PM PST by pistola (the early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim...thanks for your thoughts. I could not be on board more that I am. I am going to write more of my thoughts the first opportunity I have. I hope my thoughts make sense.

Lando

75 posted on 02/16/2004 8:52:52 PM PST by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Well Done, Mr. Robinson!

If Kerry does get elected, bye-bye freedom. Hello United Nations and what they all stand for!

Does the American Public really want that? Does the American People really know who John F. Kerry is and stands for?

We must get the truth out from now until November..we must..or this grand ole U.S. of A won't be around much longer..either literally or as we know it now.

76 posted on 02/16/2004 8:52:53 PM PST by GulfWar1Vet (I am an AMERICAN who is FREE! Are YOU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Of course Kerry isn't necessarily a shoe in.
Look to Edwards to pick up steam.

They are all elitists in sheep's clothes though.
77 posted on 02/16/2004 8:53:01 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
BTW, Jim, you know I think you have a talent for writing, and to me, this paragraph should be highlighted:

Either we re-elect President Bush or we allow President Kerry and the Democrats to surrender our national sovereignty, our national security and our national defense to the United Nations and other so-called world government bodies. The Democrats do not believe that war is sometimes necessary to defend the nation and or our national interests. The Democrats do not believe that the United States has the right to self-defense. The Democrats do not care about our national security or defending our national sovereignty. It's not in their game plan. In fact their game plan includes acquiescing to the United Nations, a world court and a world government. There's absolutely no doubt about it. It's in the record.

But, I would add that what this election may also be about is convincing some swing voters that acquiescing to the United Nations is not a good idea. That may be a harder sell.
78 posted on 02/16/2004 8:53:13 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
William H. Rehnquist, born: October 1, 1924...79 years old.

John Paul Stevens, born: April 20, 1920...83 years old.

Antonin Scalia, born: March 11, 1936...67 years old.

Sandra Day O'Connor, born: March 26, 1930...73 years old.

Anthony M. Kennedy, born: July 23, 1936...67 years old.

David Hackett Souter, born: September 17, 1939...64 years old.

Clarence Thomas, born: June 23, 1948...55 years old.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, born: March 15, 1933...70 years old.

Stephen G. Breyer, born: August 15, 1938...65 years old.

Bush/Cheney 2004!
79 posted on 02/16/2004 8:53:51 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Sure he will. He's had 3+ years and a majority in both houses.

Your agenda is so transparent... you know better than that.

80 posted on 02/16/2004 8:54:11 PM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson