Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Friedman: Kerry, not Bush, can deliver the most crucial comments on Iraq (Kerry undermines US)
The Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 02/17/2004 | Thomas Friedman

Posted on 02/17/2004 3:40:20 PM PST by e_castillo

The situation in Iraq is fast approaching the tipping point. The terrorists know that if they can wreak enough havoc, kill enough Iraqis waiting in line to join their own police force, they can prevent the United Nations from coming up with a plan for elections and a stable transfer of U.S. authority to an Iraqi government. Once authority is in Iraqi hands, the Baathists and Islamists have a real problem: They can't even pretend to be fighting the United States anymore. It will be clear to all Arabs and Muslims that they are fighting against the freedom and independence of Iraq and for their own lunatic ideologies. Which is why they are desperate to prevent us from reaching that tipping point. Their strategy is to sow chaos, defeat President Bush and hope that his Democratic successor will pull out. Which is also why at this moment the most important statement on Iraq that can be made -- one that could even save lives -- is nothing Bush could say. No, the most important statement on Iraq right now could only come from the likely Democratic presidential nominee, John Kerry.

Imagine that Tim Russert followed his excellent interview with Bush with an interview Sunday with Kerry. Here's what I hope it would sound like. Russert: "Sen. Kerry, you essentially voted in favor of the war, but argued that the way the Bush team carried it out was deeply flawed. Well, now we're there. Tell the American people how you would deal with Iraq going forward."

Kerry: "Tim, before I answer that question, I first want to direct a message to the die-hard Baathists and Islamo-fascists who've been slaughtering Iraqis struggling to build their first democratic government. And my message to these terrorists is this: 'READ MY LIPS -- if I am president, I will not cut and run. I will not pull our troops out in the face of your intimidation the way Ronald Reagan fled from Lebanon.' Because that panicky retreat from Beirut in 1984 started us down this whole path, where terrorists believed if they hit us hard enough, we would run and they would get away with it. I hate how George Bush has prosecuted this war. I know I could do better. But I want every suicide bomber -- from Bali to Baghdad -- to understand one thing about a Kerry administration: 'You can blow yourselves up from now until next Ramadan, but we'll still be in Iraq. You'll be dead, but we'll still be there. Which part of that sentence don't you understand?'

"I don't say this to be macho-man, Tim. I'm not George Bush. I say this because it's the best way to save American and Iraqi lives. You see, Tim, I identify so strongly with my band of brothers and sisters wearing the American uniform in Iraq. The best way to endanger them is to suggest to the terrorists that there is daylight between me and President Bush -- that if he won't run, I will. Well, there is no daylight on ends. A Kerry administration will see that Iraqis get every chance to produce their own representative government.

"But there is daylight on means. You see, Tim, if I were president, I would insist that we have a real policy of energy conservation to enlist every American in this war, by asking each of us to choke off some of the funds going to the Islamist totalitarians. I would immediately invite the leaders of the U.N., Germany, France and NATO to Camp David to rebuild the alliance that won the Cold War, so we have the staying power to win this war of ideas in the Muslim world. And I would have my secretary of state out in the Middle East regularly, arguing our case, bolstering our allies and trying to bring about a secure peace for Israelis and Palestinians.

"Oh yes, Tim, my means would be very different. Unlike the Bush team, I understand that just because you have a hammer, not every problem is a nail. It takes more than force to win a war of ideas. But on ends, Tim, let no one have any illusions: a Kerry presidency will pay any price and bear any burden to try to build a decent Iraqi regime in the heart of the Arab world. My making that commitment now is the best way to prove to the terrorists that their actions are futile, and in that way save American and Iraqi lives. Failure to make that commitment would have horrific consequences for U.S. foreign policy.

"Tim, I am no dreamer. I've seen a quagmire close up. We can't want a unified, decent Iraq more than the Iraqis themselves. Ultimately, they will have to step up and come together around a plan and a leader. But the terrorists should have no illusions, and the Iraqi people should have no fears: America under John Kerry will give them every chance to succeed. We will not run."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iraq; kerry; thomaslfriedman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: GulliverSwift
Kerry would have gone, hat in hand, to France and the rest of that spineless crowd at the UN, offered endless compromises and bags of money if Muslims would just be nice. For years, France has paid Arab govt's extortion money so they wouldn't blow up Paris. Kerry would have done the same, and we'd have gasoline at $3.50 per gallon in no time. Plus, he's already saying we'd be conserving energy so we wouldn't have to send troops overseas to make the Arabs behave. Does this sound familiar? Can we all spell....C...A...R...T...E...R?
21 posted on 02/17/2004 4:50:57 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
"I applaud Friedman for trying to kick his fellow Dims in the rear and wake them up to reality. It's a rarity these days coming from a committed Democrat."

Unfortunately, by cueing Kerry to be forcefully bipartisan and pro-American, Friedman is merely peeing in the wind...

22 posted on 02/17/2004 4:53:48 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
And, even if Kerry said what Friedman wants, who would believe him?
23 posted on 02/17/2004 4:55:05 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okie01
You've got a point there.
24 posted on 02/17/2004 4:57:24 PM PST by GulliverSwift (Keep the <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/">gigolo</a> out of the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo
you're right of course, Kerry couldn't hope to get many democratic votes by doing that, and most of the republican votes already belong to W.

my general point is that Kerry should (and i stress should) do what is right. and I realize that not everyone on this forum is religous at all, so they might disagree somewhere. So someone believes we cannot gauge what is right and no one can proove otherwise... this is a fallacy called argumentum ad Ignorantium (I know this b/c I'm on my highschool debate team) rather my point would be, not that we *cannot gauge* what is right, but that we should gauge what is right for ourselves given what we know and have been taught. Yeah I can understand your point is well, Kerry wouldn't have a snowball's chance in Hades of getting nominated if he makes a statement like this. but you know it would get him lined up for a victory from right-wing swing voters (if there is such a thing).

the point of the article is that a statement like this from Kerry would result in a reduction of terrorist attacks (or so I gather)
25 posted on 02/17/2004 4:59:06 PM PST by conservative_crusader (Annuit Coeptis (He has smiled on our undertaking))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Repeat after me:
"Liberals cannot be trusted with executive power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with executive power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with executive power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with executive power"
Et cetera...

Repeat after me:
"Liberals cannot be trusted with legislative power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with legislative power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with legislative power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with legislative power"
Et cetera...

Repeat after me:
"Liberals cannot be trusted with judicial power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with judicial power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with judicial power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with judicial power"
Et cetera...

Repeat after me:
"Liberals cannot be trusted with power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with power"
"Liberals cannot be trusted with power"
Et cetera...

26 posted on 02/17/2004 5:13:12 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
Friedman is desperate.

period.

27 posted on 02/17/2004 5:16:15 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Just reading Kerry's rant makes my hair stand on end.

I've already started yelling at the TV when he comes on. Thank heaven for the mute button!

28 posted on 02/17/2004 5:20:31 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I just wish one reporter would have the 'nads to ask Kerry one thing...Senator, you say you can build coalitions that would help us in places like Iraq, tell me what happens if they tell you no like they did Bush? Would you do what you had determined what was right for us or would you stand down?
29 posted on 02/17/2004 5:22:21 PM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Yes. Friedman still thinks that peace in the Middle East can come via negotiations that rely on logic or common sense thinking from Arabs raised from infancy to hate.
30 posted on 02/17/2004 5:27:11 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo
The flaw in Friedman's reasoning is that he assumes that Kerry will put the national interest ahead of his own political advantage. No chance of that. From now until election day, it's in Kerry's interest to have the Islamofascists make the situation in Iraq as messy as possible for the U.S., and the terrorists have a vested interest in a Democratic victory. If the Democrats win, they win.
31 posted on 02/17/2004 5:39:50 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
it's in Kerry's interest to have the Islamofascists make the situation in Iraq as messy as possible for the U.S

That pretty much sums it up.
32 posted on 02/17/2004 6:09:55 PM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo
Their strategy is to sow chaos, defeat President Bush and hope that his Democratic successor will pull out.

Terrorist are rooting for a Dem President

And worse .. the Dems are embracing it

33 posted on 02/17/2004 6:12:36 PM PST by Mo1 (" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo
ROTFLMCO!!!! Can any of you even imagine how stupid Kerry would sound coming out with something like this? Besides, even if Friedman is too dumb to know Kerry's history, I guarantee you the terrorists aren't.

How old is Friedman, 12?

34 posted on 02/17/2004 6:16:50 PM PST by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson