Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Reportedly Building 3 Aircraft Carriers (Rumor yet to be confirmed)
http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/howtomakewar/default.asp?target=htnavai.htm&base=htnavai&Prev=0&BeginCnt=31 ^

Posted on 02/18/2004 1:29:59 PM PST by Filibuster_60

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2004 1:30:00 PM PST by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
That's the bad news. The good news is, the carriers are based on the French design.
2 posted on 02/18/2004 1:30:46 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60

Buncha junk.

3 posted on 02/18/2004 1:32:27 PM PST by martin_fierro (I miss the Media Schadenfreude Ping)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
The design that scuttles itself at the first sign of enemy ships or the other one that just capsizes and has a big white flag painted on the bottom?
4 posted on 02/18/2004 1:33:34 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Would not surprise me, they are hot to trot in space, stands to reason they aren't going to ignore the sea.
5 posted on 02/18/2004 1:36:47 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I can't wait for them to try real naval aviation. Boy are they in for a few surprises.

But I expect they have copies of all of our NATOPS manuals...

6 posted on 02/18/2004 1:37:33 PM PST by Taylor42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Taylor42
I can't wait for them to try real naval aviation. Boy are they in for a few surprises.

Yeah considered the late aviator Wong Wei was one of their aces.

7 posted on 02/18/2004 1:39:52 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Heads up, Jeff Head!
8 posted on 02/18/2004 1:41:03 PM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Nice of them to build the first significant targets our navy has had since WWII.....
9 posted on 02/18/2004 1:42:12 PM PST by dixierat (Just a white boy lookin' for a place to do my thing....(Merle Haggard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
The Chinese bought the USSR's last and only jet aircraft carrier. It stands to reason they would build more.
10 posted on 02/18/2004 1:42:22 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
If these rumors prove to be true, the most disturbing thing is how it challenges the conventional wisdom that China's given up on aircraft carriers for the time being. I remember a while back People's Daily English version actually ran an article explaining why the PLAN won't acquire carriers in the near future. More recently the Taiwanese press has reported China's seeking small helicopter carriers as a stopgap measure. We'll see soon enough what's really been going on.
11 posted on 02/18/2004 1:44:35 PM PST by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
The local fish population will be very happy to hear that they have a couple of new artificial reefs coming their way.
12 posted on 02/18/2004 1:45:33 PM PST by AngryJawa (It Is Not One World...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
The Three A/C names:

1. Mai Ding Dong

2. One Hung Low

3. Yu Fat Too

13 posted on 02/18/2004 1:50:06 PM PST by Enterprise ("Do you know who I am?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
That thing is two Harpoon Missles away from being an artificial reef for divers to swim though.
14 posted on 02/18/2004 1:50:25 PM PST by Armedanddangerous (The first rule of gunfighting is to have a gun...more than one, if possible..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BroncosFan
Chicom Aircraft Carrier Ping.

Do you think they'll be able to make this work? Carrier aviation is tougher than it looks.

15 posted on 02/18/2004 1:50:45 PM PST by Modernman ("When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." -Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taylor42
NATOPS manuals are only a part of the equation.

The real strength of U.S. carrier aviation is the living history and experience in countless areas that is handed down, squid to squid, officer to officer, pilot to pilot in an unbroken chain going back to the old USS Langley.

No other nation even comes close.

Still, it will be interesting to see what the Chinese do with these things. Not that I expect them to be very effective, at least, not for many years.
16 posted on 02/18/2004 1:56:27 PM PST by Ronin (When the fox gnaws -- Smile!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Wow, a carrier without assigned air assets.

So I guess any carrier-capable fighter or attack jet stick in the PLAN will be expected to just show up full qualified to trap and launch from any of the three carriers. Mix and match. With and without ordnance, day, night, NVG, in all weather conditions (above flight minimums). And they will gain and maintain their at-sea flight quals by ???

This is an extremely dangerous business even with dedicated carrier air groups. Unfortunately, the Chinese may be in for some unpleasant surprises. Wonder how many pilots they will kill, aircraft they will destroy and how much damage they will do to the ships before they realize buying a dedicated air group is actually cheaper. (Nice power protection bonus when they do that too.)

But who knows. With their reliance on the extensive carrier operation experience of the Russians and their own potent submarine operational experience, they could be a serious menace in the western Pacific region. ;-)
17 posted on 02/18/2004 1:56:50 PM PST by Captain Rhino (If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
These aren't carriers like we're used to. Seems to me they won't be of much use more than 500 miles off the Chinese coast. Area and sea denial, not power projection, would appear to be their mission. On the other hand, if the steam catapult feature is indeed being added, it would indicate they do intend to operate at least a few heavy strike planes.
18 posted on 02/18/2004 1:56:51 PM PST by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
This may be what is driving steel prices sky high lately. China is buying up ALL of the us scrap steel available.
19 posted on 02/18/2004 1:57:41 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise; Poohbah
"I have always been here."
20 posted on 02/18/2004 1:57:45 PM PST by hchutch ("I never get involved with my own life. It's too much trouble." - Michael Garibaldi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson