Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electoral College Breakdown, Installment One
Various

Posted on 02/19/2004 8:45:25 AM PST by Dales

Edited on 02/19/2004 10:36:05 AM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]

Due to popular demand, I am going to revive my poll tracking and analysis that I did during the 2000 election season. I will be starting things a bit differently this year. Instead of starting off with a comprehensive overview of the entire nation, I am going to start by looking at five states at a time. For the first installment, the random state generator presented me with North Dakota, Maine, Alabama, New Mexico, and Vermont.

North Dakota
Electoral Votes: 3
2000 Result
Bush 61%
Gore 33%

Background: North Dakota is always a problematic state for my poll tracking, in that it is so rarely, if ever, polled. There are good reasons for this. It is a very small state, with only three electoral votes. It also is rarely competitive. The last time the Democrats won in North Dakota was when Lyndon Johnson trounced Barry Goldwater in 1964. Since then, Republican candidates have carried North Dakota by margins from a low of 7 points (Bob Dole against Bill Clinton) to a high of 38 points (Reagan against Carter). Obviously, George W. Bush had little problem with Al Gore last election cycle.

Polling Data: None available.

Punditry: There is zero chance that North Dakota will be a factor in this election. If the election is close nationwide, North Dakota will not be, and if North Dakota is then the nationwide election won't be. Safe Bush


Maine
Electoral Votes: 4
2000 Result
Gore 49%
Bush 44%

Background: Despite having only a single more electoral vote than tiny North Dakota, Maine gets a bit more attention due to its proximity to the media hotbeds in New England. However, it is rarely listed as a swing state for the coming election, which is a mistake. Bush lost to Gore by only 5 points last time, and over the past 10 elections it has split evenly between the parties. The best way to describe Maine is streaky, as those elections have been Democrats for two straight, Republicans for five straight, and now Democrats for the last three. Perhaps it is because Nader picked up 5% that people assume that Maine will be less competitive this time.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat
3/03 Critical Insights Link 600 RV 4.0 Bush 47% Unnamed Democrat 36%
9/12-26/03 Critical Insights Link 600 RV 4.0 Bush 36% Unnamed Democrat 45%

Punditry: Maine has been tracking the nationwide polls regarding Bush for quite some time now, generally with him lagging by a point or two here. If the election is close nationwide, expect this state to stay close, particularly if Kerry is the nominee. Despite being a New England state, Maine tends to vote for Democrats who are centrist and reject those who are perceived to be liberal. Slight Advantage Democrat.


Alabama
Electoral Votes: 9
2000 Result
Bush 56%
Gore 42%

Background: Alabama has been a reliable GOP state, only straying twice since 1960; both times it went for a southerner. Jimmy Carter carried the state, as did George Wallace.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat
4/27/03 USA Polling Group Link RV 5% Bush 60% Unnamed Democrat 30

Punditry: This is another state, like North Dakota, which falls into the category of "if this one is close, the election is not". Bush will carry Alabama comfortably. Safe Bush.


New Mexico
Electoral Votes: 5
2000 Result
Gore 48%
Bush 48%

Background: No state, not even Florida, was closer in the last election than New Mexico. Prior to Clinton breaking through, the Republicans had carried the state for 6 consecutive elections, often by significant margins. Both times that Clinton carried New Mexico, the Perot vote played a significant factor. The strong showing Perot made here suggests that this is a state concerned with Mexico, both from an immigration perspective and from a jobs perspective.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat
9/12/03 Research and Polling Inc. of Albuquerque Link 400 RV Bush 40% Unnamed Democrat 43%

Punditry: Simply on the basis of the close election results in 2000, New Mexico is going to be a state to keep an eye on, and the poll from last September indicates that it will still be a battle. I sense, however, that this state will be less friendly to the President this time around due to NAFTA, his immigration proposal, and the popularity of Democrat governor Bill Richardson. Slight Advantage Democrat.


Vermont
Electoral Votes: 3
2000 Result
Gore 51%
Bush 41%

Background: Vermont went for Lyndon Johnson, then not for another Democrat until Bill Clinton. It has gone Democrat the last three elections (by 16, 22, and 10 points). Third party candidates are a factor in Vermont, even if they do not generally swing the state.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat
10/02 Research 2000 Link 400 LV 5% Bush 38% Dean 50%
10/28/03 Research 2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 46% Dean 34%

Punditry: Vermont has changed dramatically since the days when Ronald Reagan had been carrying the state. The Republican voters there are loyal, but they are simply outnumbered. Safe Democrat.


Summary Table
  Bush Democrat
  Safe Strong Lean Slight Tossup Slight Lean Strong Safe
  ND (3) - - - - NM (5) - - VT (3)
  AL (9) - - - - ME (4) - - -
Designation
Total:
12 - - - - 9 - - 3
Candidate
Total:
12 - 12
Undesignated electoral votes: 514

Next installment: Colorado, Georgia, North Carolina, Montana, Massachusetts

Historical election data and graphics are located at Dave Leip's invaluable website.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Maine; US: New Mexico; US: North Dakota; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: dales; ecb; electionpresident; electoralcollege; gwb2004; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Neets
Add me. Please.
41 posted on 02/19/2004 9:41:19 AM PST by Krodg ("My faith frees me"...G.W. Bush........'A Charge To Keep')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Put me on ping list also!

Thanks

42 posted on 02/19/2004 9:43:35 AM PST by beaureguard (Herman Cain for Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Maine assigns their 4 electoral votes by giving 2 to the winner of the statewide popular vote, 1 to the winner of the vote in Congressional District 1, and 1 to the winner of Congressional District 2. IIRC, Bush was VERY close to Gore in District 2 in 2000.

It is a distinct possibility that Maine's electoral votes will be split this time: 3 to the Dems, 1 to Bush.
43 posted on 02/19/2004 9:44:57 AM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Thanks for the hard work. Very informative.
44 posted on 02/19/2004 9:48:10 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I remember your work from 2000. You ought to consider selling your services, they are pretty darned good.
45 posted on 02/19/2004 9:51:38 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Please add me to the ping list.
46 posted on 02/19/2004 9:55:29 AM PST by CIApilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Neets; Dales
This is great stuff, Dales!

Put me on the ping list please, Neets.
47 posted on 02/19/2004 9:56:30 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Please add me to the Dales ping list.

Does anyone have a chart that shows migration of electoral votes from 2000 to 2004? That would be helpful in tracking the EV contest since the last one was so close and I'm not expecting too many states to change.
48 posted on 02/19/2004 9:57:53 AM PST by Tall_Texan ((Tagline withheld pending notification of next of kin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Dales, thank you VERY much for your superb work in helping to teach and inform us about polls, election trends, and related material. I look forward to your continued reports throughout this election season.
49 posted on 02/19/2004 10:16:56 AM PST by Wolfstar (A self-confident cowboy nation, or a Kerrified nation. Your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets
I would like to be on the ping list, too. Thanks.
50 posted on 02/19/2004 10:26:33 AM PST by scan58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Funny, I was thinking of you just this morning. Would you like me to make graphs for you like the last election? I have better tools than I did 4 years ago and we can do some neater things, like linking to webpages stored on my ISP's server. We can also do some data mining and analysis that we weren't able to do back in 2000.
51 posted on 02/19/2004 10:26:59 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
It is a distinct possibility that Maine's electoral votes will be split this time: 3 to the Dems, 1 to Bush.

Or vice versa.

52 posted on 02/19/2004 10:28:55 AM PST by JohnnyZ (People don't just bump into each other and have sex. This isn't Cinemax! -- Jerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Neets; Dales
Welcome back Dales, your work is much appreciated.

Neets, please add me to the ping list.

53 posted on 02/19/2004 10:30:53 AM PST by nevergiveup (I AM that guy from Pawtucket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
If you would like. I am actually in the middle of some development work on my own which should allow a lot more of the in-depth toying with data that we all enjoy so much. So in other words, I am pretty tied up with my own efforts, but anything you want to do that will bring more insight to folks I am all for!
54 posted on 02/19/2004 10:32:16 AM PST by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LS
Suggestion here: Make the Republicans Red and the Democrats Blue. That is what the news services have been doing. It also is what was done in the last presidential election on a map that people stared at for long periods of time.
55 posted on 02/19/2004 10:36:58 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
I was just going to reply that I was glad to see the Republicans *back* to the blue that I remember them being for so many years. RED is definitely more fitting of the dems.
My thoughts are the media stole blue from us in 2000.
56 posted on 02/19/2004 10:55:55 AM PST by scan58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Please add me to your ping list. Thank you.
57 posted on 02/19/2004 10:57:55 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I may (MAY) be going to college in Maine, so hopefully the GOP organizations up there aren't so anemic that they aren't willing to do some grassroots campaigning. Even if we push the 2nd district over the top, that's 1 electoral vote. Every little bit helps.
58 posted on 02/19/2004 11:00:33 AM PST by GiveEmDubya (The Democrats: Working Hard to Create a Perpetual Leftopia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Neets
ping me, please!
59 posted on 02/19/2004 11:14:33 AM PST by Galatians513
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I think it's too early to say Maine and New Mexico lean slightly to the Democrat candidate. I would put them both as toss-ups, although if I was forced to choose which way they leaned, I would say NM is a slight lean for Bush and Maine a slight lean to Kerry. At the end of the day, I don't think Kerry (who supported NAFTA, BTW) will be able to carry NM unless he picks Richardson as his running mate (and Richardson publicly has said no on several occasions), since Bush will increase his share of the Hispanic vote there and since this time there shouldn't be a snowstorm in the southern (and Republican) part of the state.
60 posted on 02/19/2004 11:15:16 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson