Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Cross visits Saddam Hussein
BBC News ^ | 2/21/04

Posted on 02/21/2004 5:26:19 AM PST by areafiftyone

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has visited imprisoned former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein for the first time.

Spokesman Nada Dumani said two ICRC officials, including a doctor, visited him on Saturday and hope to conduct further visits.

They carried out a physical and mental evaluation of the former president, who is in US custody in Iraq.

They also took a letter from Saddam Hussein for his family.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: icrc; prisonersaddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: OXENinFLA
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Relax. It's SOP with prisoner's of war. He does have a couple of daughters and some grandkids if I recall correctly.

41 posted on 02/21/2004 12:13:41 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Don't try to tug at my heart strings. I have no heart and it will make me suspicious of your motives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Yes, I agree.
42 posted on 02/21/2004 12:16:24 PM PST by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Pharmboy
Stop with the ignorant Whats!!! Saddam is officially a POW (designated so by our gvt). Under the Geneva convention POWS can send and get mail to family members and his status as a POW must be checked by members of the RedCross.
43 posted on 02/21/2004 12:19:56 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
He does have a couple of daughters and some grandkids if I recall correctly.

Who are widows and fatherless thanks to Saddam.

45 posted on 02/21/2004 1:26:01 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe (The brighter you are, the more you have to learn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"Where was the Red Cross when all the Iraqi's were being murdered by Saddam?"

==

EXACTLY!!!

Where was the Red Cross, when the Taliban were murdering their people in Afghanistan?

And is the Red Cross visiting the jailed prisoners in Iran, which the Mullah's arrest and probably murder?

Is the Red Cross visiting the political prisoners of Castro?

Is the Red Cross paying attention to the concentration camps in N. Korea?"

How the hell can a civilian organisation operate in countries that do not allow them to have access or full access to all regions of their countries? For example the Taliban banned the Red Cross from operating freely within Afghanistan. You might as well be saying why is the US not liberating by force the opressed of those nations that you list (less Afghanistan).

46 posted on 02/21/2004 1:31:41 PM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Stop accusing me of saying the RC shouldn't have visited Saddam! I don't like the RC AT ALL. They love dictators and lefties. They can kiss Saddam's wounds and give him a haircut. I don't care.
47 posted on 02/21/2004 1:33:47 PM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I hate the Red Cross ever since that bitch Elizabeth Dole refused to send aid to Serbia to support the terrorist Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army to whom her husband Bob had whored himself out to.
48 posted on 02/21/2004 2:11:18 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I hate the Red Cross ever since that bitch Elizabeth Dole refused to send aid to Serbia (to punish the Serbs) because of her support the terrorist Albanian Kosovo Liberation Army to whom her husband Bob had whored himself out to.
49 posted on 02/21/2004 2:12:02 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
What is the real problem is that the Red Cros,leftists, and gullible people, keep trying to get moral equivalence between terrorists and murdering dictators with genuine POW-s.
50 posted on 02/21/2004 2:12:50 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Never give to Red Cross. They made our soldier pay for coffee when they came home from fighting. My family will never give to Red Cross.
51 posted on 02/21/2004 3:12:34 PM PST by ducks1944
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Destro
We agree!
52 posted on 02/21/2004 3:42:57 PM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
--OFF TOPIC--

FairOpinion, I clicked on the link you provided about the NK gas chamber. After reading that horrifying story I checked out some other links at the bottom of that page from The Guardian (UK):

In Pictures/Korean War

Pic #1 text:
South Korean napalm victim
The caption on this US army photo identified this man as a South Korean victim of a napalm bombing raid near Suwon, South Korea, on January 29 1951. Gasoline-gel napalm bombs were used extensively by US forces during the Korean war.

Pic #3 text:
Planes used during the war
An F-80 jet fighter-bomber and a T-6 Texan (foreground). Declassified air force reports of debriefings of F-80 pilots in 1950 indicate they sometimes strafed South Korean refugee groups, as alleged by Korean survivors of such attacks.

Pic #6 text:
Fleeing Yongdong
One Korean family in a long line of refugees fleeing Yongdong tries to save some furniture in this July 26 1950 photo. When communist North Korea invaded South Korea, tens of thousands of South Korean civilians fled south with retreating troops. On this day, eight miles down the road from Yongdong, hundreds of refugees came under fire from US troops, according to witnesses.

This is outrageous. Looks like we have "news agencies" like Guardian Unlimited to thank for the increasing anti-Americanism in Britain.

53 posted on 02/21/2004 4:23:39 PM PST by Mackey (Like it or not, we *are* in a religious war with islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mackey
First of all what we may or may have done, I hope you caught the "it's alleged" part, was in time of war.

What the N. Koreans have been doing is in time of peace, murdering their own people.
54 posted on 02/21/2004 4:58:37 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I am soooo proud to be a member of the last remaining country that actually abides by the Geneva Conventions!
The Red Cross has been an illegitimate NGO ignoring its narrow charter for years.
I used to work for them, over a decade ago.They have become "progressively" worse.
Yank their charter and tax-exempt status.
Along with the UNs.
Start over.


55 posted on 02/21/2004 5:30:49 PM PST by sarasmom (Hanoi Jane admires John F*ing Kerry's military service in Vietnam=things that make you go hmmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I hope we moved ex president Sadam after their visit.

They probably had two GPS's with each of the red cross workers.

56 posted on 02/21/2004 5:33:19 PM PST by TYVets ("An armed society is a polite society." - Robert A. Heinlein & me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
Wow...I would probably lose to you in chess. Good thinkin'
57 posted on 02/21/2004 5:59:26 PM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The Red Cross provides cover for terrorists fighting Israel.
58 posted on 02/21/2004 7:13:20 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Considering how the Red Cross cannot be trusted, they may well deliberately or accidentally reveal Saddam's location, and the terrorists and Baathists may try to attack and free him.

I'm not the one guarding him, yet even I think it would be prudent to move him to a temporary holding location for this visit. It's common sense.

59 posted on 02/21/2004 8:45:00 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never let your life be directed by people who could only get government jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
The problem is that moving a dangerous prisoner is dangerous in itself. The Baathists may get wind of it -- it's easier to attack a moving convoy than a fortress.

I think they shouldn't have let the Red Cross see him, let them scream. But if because of them they get attacked and the Baathists are successful in releasing Saddam -- just think of the disaster that will create. Even if the chances are one in a million, and with the Red cross is more like 50-50, we shouldn't be taking chances like that.
60 posted on 02/21/2004 8:57:11 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson