Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disenchanted Bush Voters Consider Crossing Over (Independent joins GOP in just two weeks time!)
NY Times ^ | 2.22.04

Posted on 02/21/2004 5:07:32 PM PST by ambrose

Disenchanted Bush Voters Consider Crossing Over By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL

Published: February 22, 2004

BEACHWOOD, Ohio - In the 2000 presidential election, Bill Flanagan a semiretired newspaper worker, happily voted for George W. Bush. But now, shaking his head, he vows, "Never again."

"The combination of lies and boys coming home in body bags is just too awful," Mr. Flanagan said, drinking coffee and reading newspapers at the local mall. "I could vote for Kerry. I could vote for any Democrat unless he's a real dummy."

Mr. Flanagan is hardly alone, even though polls show that the overwhelming majority of Republicans who supported Mr. Bush in 2000 will do so again in November. In dozens of random interviews around the country, independents and Republicans who said they voted for Mr. Bush in 2000 say they intend to vote for the Democratic presidential candidate this year. Some polls are beginning to bolster the idea of those kind of stirrings among Republicans and independents.

That could change, of course, once the Bush campaign begins pumping millions of dollars into advertising and making the case for his re-election.

But even as Democratic and Republican strategists and pollsters warned that a shift could be transitory, they also said it could prove to be extraordinarily consequential in a year when each side is focused on turning out its most loyal voters.

"The strong Republicans are with him," a senior aide to Senator John Kerry said of Mr. Bush. "But there are independent-minded Republicans among whom he is having serious problems."

"With the nation so polarized," he added, "the defections of a few can make a big difference."

In the interviews, many of those potential "crossover" voters said they supported the invasion of Iraq but had come to see the continuing involvement there as too costly and without clear objectives.

Many also said they believed that the Bush administration had not been honest about its reasons for invading Iraq and were concerned about the failure to find unconventional weapons. Some of these people described themselves as fiscal conservatives who were alarmed by deficit spending, combined with job losses at home. Many are shocked to find themselves switching sides.

While sharing a sandwich at the stylish Beachwood Mall in this Cleveland suburb, one older couple ? a judge and a teacher ? reluctantly divulged their secret: though they are stalwarts in the local Republican Party, they are planning to vote Democratic this year.

"I feel like a complete traitor, and if you'd asked me four months ago, the answer would have been different," said the judge, after assurances of anonymity. "But we are really disgusted. It's the lies, the war, the economy. We have very good friends who are staunch Republicans, who don't even want to hear the name George Bush anymore."

In 2000, Mr. Bush won here in Ohio with 50 percent of the popular vote, as against 46.5 percent for Al Gore.

George Meagher, a Republican who founded and now runs the American Military Museum in Charleston, S.C., said he threw his "heart and soul" into the Bush campaign four years ago. He organized veterans to attend campaign events, including the campaign's kickoff speech at the Citadel. He even has photographs of himself and his wife with Mr. Bush.

"Given the outcome and how dissatisfied I am with the administration, it's hard to think about now," he said. "People like me, we're all choking a bit at not supporting the president. But when I think about 500 people killed and what we've done to Iraq. And what we've done to our country. I mean, we're already $2 trillion in debt again."

A nationwide CBS News poll released Feb. 16 found that 11 percent of people who voted for Mr. Bush in 2000 now say they will vote for the Democratic candidate this fall. But there was some falloff among those who voted against him as well. Five percent of people who said they voted for Mr. Gore in 2000 say this time they will back Mr. Bush.

On individual issues, the poll found some discontent among Republicans but substantial discontent among independents. For instance, on handling the nation's economy, 19 percent of Republicans and 56 percent of independents said they disapproved of the job Mr. Bush was doing.

"As the president's job rating has fallen, his Democratic supporters have pulled away first, then the independents and now we're starting to see a bit of erosion among the Republicans, who used to support him pretty unanimously," said Evans Witt, the chief executive of Princeton Survey Research Associates. "If 10 to 15 percent of Republicans do not support him anymore, that is not trivial for Bush's re-election."

But Matthew Dowd, the Bush campaign's chief strategist, suggested that no one in the White House was worried about Mr. Bush's losing much of his base. He said polls continued to show that the president was enjoying the support of 90 percent of Republicans.

Many of those interviewed said that they had experienced a growing disenchantment with the conflict in Iraq over many months, but that only recently had they decided to change their votes.

A number said they had been deeply disturbed by recent statements of David A. Kay, the former United Nations weapons inspector, who said he was skeptical about administration claims that Iraq possessed unconventional weapons.

"The lack of evidence on Iraq has really hurt him, and the economy here is bad ? there's a lot of unemployment in the mills," said Phyllis Pierce, who is in the steel business in Cleveland and recently decided not to vote for Mr. Bush again.

John Scarnado, a sales manager from Austin, Tex., who voted for Mr. Bush in 2000, said he would vote for Mr. Kerry if the senator won the Democratic nomination.

"I'm upset about Iraq and the vice president and his affiliation with Halliburton," said Mr. Scarnado, a registered Republican who said that he had not always voted along party lines. "I think the Bush administration is coming out to look like old boy politics, and I don't have a good feel about that."

Many of those wavering in their loyalty to Mr. Bush were middle-class voters who said that his tax relief programs had disproportionately helped the wealthy.

"I voted for him, but it seems like he's just taking care of his rich buddies now," said Mike Cross, a farmer from Londonderry, N.H., adding, "I'm not a great fan of John Kerry, but I've had enough of President Bush."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: billflanagan; bogus; deceit; fabrications; flanagan; georgemeagher; georgemeahger; gregpacker; gwb2004; kerry; kerrycampaign; meager; meagher; mediabias; myths; nyt; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-257 last
To: ambrose
You made Instapundit
241 posted on 02/23/2004 5:03:10 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
unfortunately im hearing from some of my friends this exact statement...but its a long way till election day...but as far as the senate in control of republicans..since when?
242 posted on 02/23/2004 5:08:11 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: diotima
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!
This guy sure gets around.

Around here, in the Sacramento California area, there are a group of these "progressive, kool aid type" clowns calling the talk shows going through the comedy routine, I am a lifelong Republican, but..."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

They really think it's working!

243 posted on 02/23/2004 5:16:51 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neets
"...he started by mocking The President and calling him names and then railing on about how all the President cares about is his tax breaks ..."

Isn't it remarkable that this mass hysteria affects professors exactly the same way it affects our resident village idiot at work?

Namecalling... the first tipoff.

244 posted on 02/23/2004 5:25:56 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I can't believe anybody who would make the inane statements we see above, could EVER have been a Republican or Bush supporter to begin with.

Whenever I run across a wingnut trying this loser technique, I immediately agree with him:

Yeah! The U.S. is too influential, too successful, too innovative, too rich and too helpful to other loser countries.
It pisses me off!

... so I'm setting the barn on fire to get rid of the rats!

245 posted on 02/23/2004 5:36:42 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Action-America; Texasforever
Quoting Warren Buffet who fought the President over tax cuts and almost every positive economic proposal? There's someone I just know care about me and all of us who show up and do our jobs.

Your cowl is on too tight.

246 posted on 02/23/2004 6:04:09 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
Ping
247 posted on 02/23/2004 10:23:27 AM PST by axel f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Your rantings are completely illogical. The wealthy are leaving. Why? Because Bush cut income, capital gains and dividends taxes? It is just such a bunch of garbage. Here I am use to hearing that Bush panders to the wealthy and we have a right-wing extremeist telling me he is driving them away. Since the USA has among the lowest taxes in the world, I am ppretty safe is saying that this guy is printing is absolute 100% trash.

I wont write a long rant like you did. Unlike you I dont thank you are woth the time or effort.

You rant about the Patriot Act killing wealth and forcing people to move I guess to high tax countries in Europe. But yet you dont offer any concrete examples only rantings.

It is completely dellusional to believe that Americans are leaving this country because their wealth is being destroyed the the President and are relocating to countries with significantly higer confiscatory tax rates....

Ans I stand by my position that 350,000 Americans are not leaving the country each year permanently due to their wealth being destroyed.



248 posted on 02/23/2004 11:54:14 AM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
problem with you guys on the extreme right or left, is you refeuse to acknowledge the threat posed to this country by terrorism and islamic-fascism. People like you offer no solution to the threat, blame the US as Pat Buchanan and our FR friend Richard W do or blame Israel.

In so far as the Patriot Act prevents terrorism, it is enhancing freedom. Nothing will destroy freedom faster than rampant terrorism.
249 posted on 02/23/2004 12:02:20 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Mark Strassmann: “Democrats want to exploit a contrast with Lieutenant George Bush. They charge the future Commander-in-Chief was AWOL. Call it a clear warning shot on the debate to come about national security.... Bush’s service record cuts deep for this group: veterans campaigning for John Kerry, state by state.” David Mitchell, identified as a “Republican” veteran: “He wasn’t there when we needed him.”

– CBS Evening News, February 4.

COLUMBIA, S.C., One veteran, David Mitchell, said he had to wait 17 months to see a doctor after returning home from combat. Mitchell served in the armed forces up through the first Gulf War, ( interesting phrase ) and walks with a cane.

COLUMBIA, S.C., Feb. 2 ? David Mitchell, a disabled Persian Gulf war veteran from Boston, came here to volunteer for John Kerry's South Carolina primary campaign, as he had done in Iowa and New Hampshire. He is a registered independent who voted for George W. Bush in 2000 and had never been politically active.

Me thinks that the man talks out of both sides of his face.

250 posted on 02/23/2004 1:14:50 PM PST by Little Bill (I can't take another rat in the White House at my age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: diotima
That was Greg Packer.
251 posted on 02/23/2004 9:07:48 PM PST by StriperSniper (Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
You're kidding right? YOu're telling me that as I sit here, a soldier in Baghdad Iraq that what President Bush is doing is worthless? That his efforts...MY efforts at making our country safer are all for nothing?

Be careful Action...the black helicopters are circling your hosue as we speak...make sure your tinfoil hat is in place.


Liberaltarian votes are wasted votes just as a vote was for Perot and vote for Nader will be.

People like you who help support the rats through non-action and stupid votes for people who don't have a snowballs chance of geting elected gave us Bill Clinton and threaten to give us John F'n Kerry or worse Hitlary herself.
252 posted on 02/26/2004 12:43:00 AM PST by txradioguy (HOOAH!! Not Just A Word...A Way OF Life!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
Game. set, match. God speed.
253 posted on 02/26/2004 12:44:27 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
"Compassionate Conservatism" is just a code phrase for "LIBERAL".


And Action-America is a code phrase for BLITHERING IDIOT!

Go back to the DUmmies website where you belong and stop trying to pull a fake "republican" act on us like the NY Times did with the quotes from alleged Republicans in their stories.
254 posted on 02/26/2004 12:46:40 AM PST by txradioguy (HOOAH!! Not Just A Word...A Way OF Life!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
YAWN!

Typical crap.

First, Bush's immigration ideas when it comes to our southern border IS NOT POLICY! It's a PROPOSAL. Learn to speak English before you engage your brain.

Second, point out anything in the Patriot Act as unconstitutional. You can't. It's that simple. Facts don't lie.

Third, what citizens are being denied their Constitutional rights? Name one besides Padilla! NAME ONE! I dare you. Oh, you can't. Padilla was declared an enemy combatant and will be getting a hearing in the Supreme Court...sounds like his rights are being protected to me when it comes to due process. I couldn't get the Supreme Court to hear my case if I was arrested for less given our laws.

Four, wouldn't beefing up our security forces to stop terrorism thus lead to more police and surveillance? Are you saying you want to deny the government the same resources they are given to fight organized crime and drug cartels in their fight against terrorism that has cells within our own country? Boy, that's short sighted and a jerk of the knee.

Five, any real conservative knows and understands that the deficit means nothing. It's meaningless when we are in such a change. And measuring it totally by the whole number is ludicrous if you don't take into account the percentage of GDP or the percentage of the federal budget.

As you grow older and make more income you move up from a Chevy to a Cadillac. Thus, your deficit of owing more on a car is a new record for you but ignores the fact you are capable of running a debt to obtain it.

So please, vote for someone that will never win and will never do anything and will never grow their voting base near as fast as would be required to make a real difference. But if you like slow progress, then by all means knock yourself out. At the rate it's going, the next Libertarian or Green or Conservative or any other third party will win the White House sometime in, say, 4052.
255 posted on 02/26/2004 1:00:15 AM PST by Fledermaus (This Tagline For Rent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Southack
to a point so low that a family of four earning $40,000 per year only pays $45 in annual federal income tax

I think I'm going to cry- apparently I need a spouse and two kids really bad. Even with the tax cuts I'm being reamed.

256 posted on 04/15/2004 10:29:56 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"The combination of lies and boys coming home in body bags is just too awful," Mr. Flanagan said, drinking coffee and reading newspapers at the local mall. "I could vote for Kerry. I could vote for any Democrat unless he's a real dummy."

The lies are not coming from the President dear Mr. Flanagan. And it appears you are the dummy for falling for the lies of the leftists.

257 posted on 04/15/2004 10:36:08 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-257 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson