Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue gets sixth-grader suspended
foxsports.com ^ | 02/25/04 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/24/2004 9:59:34 PM PST by Destro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: LowOiL; lewislynn
But, but lewislynn says it's only a sports magazine that just "happens" to have "pictures of swimsuits" in it.
61 posted on 02/25/2004 3:58:39 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
"There are, unfortunately, many who condone and even applaud the "standards" of Bill Clinton and Larry Flynnt. It is because of them that grammar school kids are now giving eachother oral sex on school buses."

I doubt that. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't even get remotely excited about ANY lurid activities on a school bus if I were thinking of Larry Flynt or Bill Clinton.
62 posted on 02/25/2004 4:30:03 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Mostly because we have to, since the other pages kind of stick together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
No court has ever or ever will hold Sports Illustrated to be pornographic. Your dictionary definition is meaningless in this instance. There are photographs in Time, Newsweek, National Geographic, and numerous other magazines that someone will consider sexually arousing. There are stories and novels in every school library in this nation that some will consider to be sexually arousing. They cannot--or ought not--be banned simply because someone finds them arousing or offensive.

If the student is using the magazine to disrupt a class or forcing people to view it who do not wish to, then the school has a right to ask that student to stop. But, in my opinion, and I suspect in the opinion of most Americans, the student *does* have a right to possess a copy of Sports Illustrated that shows women in bathing suits.
63 posted on 02/25/2004 4:31:05 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
Um...er...I could give you any number of euphemisms for what he was harassing, but my favorite is "the one-eyed trouser snake."
64 posted on 02/25/2004 4:34:17 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (What will we do with the drunken sailor? Depends--is the drunken sailor an affirmative action hire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Destro; shaggy eel
I hope that when he was caught with it he wasn't "turning Japanese"!
65 posted on 02/25/2004 4:36:35 PM PST by concordKIWI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
feminazis
66 posted on 02/25/2004 4:39:22 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack
hell, SI swimsuit shows more now than playboy did when i was 12.

You must be old then because I remember Playboy at 12. Your statement is wrong.

67 posted on 02/25/2004 4:40:30 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: zook
Yeah, I posit that the definition ol' Boney's floated there hinges on who decides what constitutes evidence of a 'primary purpose to cause sexual arousal.'

Me, I would prefer to have Larry Flynt decide over Jerry Falwell. Luckily, the choice isn't so stark. I get to decide. Seems to me that's the best way to deal with the issue.

However, in school, the principal does the deciding, and he did so a-okay in my book. The kid didn't bring this book in to read the articles--he was showing it to his buddies and they were drooling, you betcha.
68 posted on 02/25/2004 4:44:28 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (What will we do with the drunken sailor? Depends--is the drunken sailor an affirmative action hire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I am 54...you are probably right...but the photography wasn't as good then as it is now...The swimsuit edition does come very close though doesn't it??

BTW..what the heck were you doing looking at playboy at age 12...weren't you afraid your mother was going to was your eyes out with soap?? lol

you probably wear glasses too don't you?? lol
69 posted on 02/25/2004 4:49:49 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack
Like dirt on white shoes somehow playboys end up in the hands of teen boys.
70 posted on 02/25/2004 4:53:50 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack; concordKIWI
...but the photography wasn't as good then as it is now

,,, too much reading improves your eyesight. Five knuckle shuffle BUMP.

71 posted on 02/25/2004 5:24:25 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
My 'plaint is with the suspension, not with the principal stopping the kid from showing it around. I'm just one of those guys who thinks suspension ought to be used only in real severe cases of "life or limb."
72 posted on 02/25/2004 6:06:20 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: zook
I agree it wouldn't have been my decision--but I wouldn't have sent the kid to in-school either, were it my decision. I'd have given him the option to run it through a shredder or call his mom and tell her what he'd been doing in class with it. Either would have been sufficient punishment in my book.

Of course, the mom would probably have whined to the principal about being called at work or wherever, instead of noticing her kid was at fault for the whole thing. I can hear that conversation now.

"What, you're calling me about the swimsuit issue?"

"No, I'm calling you because your son couldn't keep it in his bookbag and refused to put it away after the teacher asked him nicely more than once."

"So you're calling me about the swimsuit issue? God, I have to go play soccer and vote for Hillary--I don't have time for this!"
73 posted on 02/25/2004 6:32:31 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (What will we do with the drunken sailor? Depends--is the drunken sailor an affirmative action hire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"Last time I checked, we were in charge of running the schools," Swarr said.

"Public" schools?

74 posted on 02/25/2004 6:39:23 PM PST by TankerKC (My life is a Country Song.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
We have this copy in our waiting room. I wondered why I started to see a lot of male patients visiting the bathroom.
75 posted on 02/26/2004 9:18:13 AM PST by concordKIWI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: concordKIWI
,,, no need to follow them in there.
76 posted on 02/26/2004 11:19:56 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
I'm already in there!
77 posted on 02/26/2004 11:32:20 AM PST by concordKIWI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson