Skip to comments.
Hillary: Iraqi Women Better Off Under Saddam
NewsMax ^
| 2/27/04
| Limbacher
Posted on 02/27/2004 8:32:32 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-165 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Maybe Saddam and his sons and all his henchmen were really women! Then she speaketh the truth!
To: Calpernia
Hillary is a very dumb broad!
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists and the democrats are sad ~ very sad!
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~
102
posted on
02/27/2004 10:32:27 AM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Calpernia; Tumbleweed_Connection; Canticle_of_Deborah; JohnHuang2; Mr. Silverback; Coleus; ...
No, no. You left out part of the headline. It's supposed to be:
Hillary: Iraqi Women Better Off Under Saddam Then They Would Be Under Me
See, now it's accurate.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"were at least assured the right to participate in Iraq's public life."
Like execution in the public arena.
To: cyncooper
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like she's back to blaming President Bush for 9/11. Yep.
105
posted on
02/27/2004 10:34:02 AM PST
by
hattend
To: nickcarraway
Only if then = than.
106
posted on
02/27/2004 10:39:20 AM PST
by
txhurl
To: hattend
Appreciate your dedication. You must have a strong stomach to read 38 pages of Hillary's rantings.
To: arasina
bump!!!!
108
posted on
02/27/2004 10:47:16 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
To: dirtboy
Saddam sons raped a few, but the majority of women had equality.
To: FR_addict
She singled out Laurence Silberman on the 9/11 commission as putting the whole commission's independence and *integrity* into question.
110
posted on
02/27/2004 10:52:00 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: FR_addict
I can read her rants much more easily than listening or looking at her. :-)
111
posted on
02/27/2004 10:57:06 AM PST
by
hattend
To: hattend
I can read her rants much more easily than listening or looking at her.That's exactly how it is for me with her. It printed out to 38 pages here at work and I will count the "you knows" when I read it tonight. Someone has to keep an eye on what she's saying.
112
posted on
02/27/2004 11:04:14 AM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug and Holier- than- Thou Socialist)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hillary actually thinks the public is stupid.
113
posted on
02/27/2004 11:07:35 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: Calpernia
114
posted on
02/27/2004 11:07:55 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: autoresponder; PhilDragoo; onyx; yall
115
posted on
02/27/2004 11:08:30 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why don't we send Hillary over to where Sadam is staying, put her in his cell for a couple of days and see who rapes who.
116
posted on
02/27/2004 11:09:24 AM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
To: FR_addict; hattend
Here are her remarks on page 19:
We also have to do more on women's rights and roles. And I have been deeply troubled by what I hear coming out of Iraq. When I was there and met with women members of the governing councils and local-of the national governing councils and local governing councils in Baghdad and Kirkuk, they were starting to express concerns about some of the pullbacks in the rights that they were given under Saddam Hussein. He was an equal opportunity oppressor, but on paper, women had rights; they went to school; they participated in the professions; they participated in the government; and business and, as long as they stayed out of his way, they had considerable freedom of movement.
Now what we see in Iraq is the governing council attempting to shift large parts of civil law into religious jurisdiction. This would be a horrific mistake and especially for it to happen on our watch. And I have spoken to the White House about this on several occasions. I appreciated Ambassador Bremer speaking out on the need to involve women. But we must go much further. I would like to see a statement from the President. I would like to see a much greater emphasis that we will not have become the vehicle by which women's rights in Iraq are turned back.
~SNIP~
She is misrepresenting the Bush administration and Bremer's oft spoken committment to the new Iraqi government being democratically elected and secular.
117
posted on
02/27/2004 11:10:41 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
To: MeekOneGOP; Mia T
Still loving your photo shop Meek!
Keep up the good work, you may be giving Mia a run for her money soon!
Bump!
118
posted on
02/27/2004 11:11:16 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
To: JohnBerger
See the transcript NewsMax used for this post. Unbelievable.
119
posted on
02/27/2004 11:12:24 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
120
posted on
02/27/2004 11:13:21 AM PST
by
swarthyguy
(You have to remember that if you grow thorns, you will not harvest roses - Ayman Al-Zawahiri)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
