Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

50-state rundown on gay marriage laws
Stateline.org ^ | 2-25-04 | Kavan Peterson

Posted on 02/27/2004 9:55:09 AM PST by Indy Pendance

More than 35 states have introduced legislation this year aimed at preserving the traditional definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Thirty-nine states already prohibit gay and lesbian couples from marrying with laws modeled after the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Passed by Congress in 1996, the federal DOMA bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages and allows states to ignore gay marriages performed elsewhere.

California, Hawaii, New Jersey and Vermont provide certain privileges to same-sex couples, short of marriage. Massachusetts is the only state slated to allow legal marriages between persons of the same sex starting May 17. Proposals have been introduced in at least four other states to expand recognition of gay and lesbian relationships.

Following is a 50-state roundup of current law and proposals to change state marriage laws. The proposals comprise state constitutional amendments, changes to state law and non-binding resolutions.

Based on information compiled from Stateline.org news reports, the Human Rights Campaign and the National Conference of State Legislatures.




TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: civilunion; doma; marriage; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 02/27/2004 9:55:09 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
.
2 posted on 02/27/2004 9:55:40 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
makes me proud to have moved to New Hampshire
3 posted on 02/27/2004 9:56:48 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Why do the states need Congress? According to the Constitution, a resolution of 34 state legislatures is enough to call a Constitutional Convention that could propose Amendments for ratification. Congress need not be involved at all. It may actually be easier to get 34 legislatures to propose the Federal Marriage Amendment than to get it to pass Congress.
4 posted on 02/27/2004 10:14:41 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
using the homo reasoning what is to stop 2 seven year olds from marrying. you know equal protection under the law.
5 posted on 02/27/2004 10:17:06 AM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"The state will extend certain state-level marriage benefits to those on a domestic partners’ registry starting Jan. 1, 2005 2003</b."
6 posted on 02/27/2004 10:19:03 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
Careful, the convention may decide to make room by taking out #2. A convention opens everything up.
7 posted on 02/27/2004 10:21:21 AM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Virginia - Two bills introduced that would reaffirm that Virginia has no constitutional or legal obligation to recognize marriages, civil unions or domestic partnership contracts between same-sex couples

Soon to be vetoed by our Rat Governor Mark "Moron" Warner

8 posted on 02/27/2004 10:22:00 AM PST by BSunday (I'm not the bad guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
CALIFORNIA

Current law: State law, passed by public referendum, bans same-sex marriage. (In defiance of that law, San Francisco has issued more than 3,200 marriage licenses to same-sex couples.) The state will extend certain state-level marriage benefits to those on a domestic partners’ registry starting Jan. 1, 2005.

Only in Kalifornia will the state help you break the law.

9 posted on 02/27/2004 10:25:21 AM PST by BSunday (I'm not the bad guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Good catch. Thanks
10 posted on 02/27/2004 10:34:06 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
(I should have been more specific)

"CALIFORNIA:

The state will extend certain state-level marriage benefits to those on a domestic partners’ registry starting Jan. 1, 2005 2003"

11 posted on 02/27/2004 10:39:55 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson