Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An NRA UPDATED on the Fight to Protect Firearms Manufactures
National Rifle Association ^ | February 27, 2004 | National Rifle Association

Posted on 02/27/2004 6:59:39 PM PST by kimber

Recent internet alerts from some "pro-Second Amendment" groups have suggested that the National Rifle Association has either accepted a compromise that would include reenactment of the 1994 Clinton Gun ban and/or the McCain-Reed gun show restrictions, or will not actively fight against their passage in the Senate. Not only are these claims completely false and ridiculous but they are also extremely counterproductive to our legislative strategy and agenda. Gun control groups are spreading the same rumors in hopes of confusing pro-gun senators as to our position in hopes of gaining their support.

The National Rifle Association led the fight in opposition to this ill-conceived ban in 1994, led the efforts to repeal the ban two years later, and is leading the fight to ensure the Clinton gun ban expires on time on September 13. From public speeches, articles in NRA publications, communications to lawmakers and the development of a website (www.ClintonGunBan.com), the National Rifle Association has been vocal and unambiguous about our position on this issue.

It is our hope that supposed "friends of the Second Amendment" will cease to provide ammunition to the enemy by disseminating this false information. Unfortunately, some of these groups seem intent on finding or creating any excuse to defeat S. 1805, perhaps because its passage has been a priority of the NRA for four years. The anti- gunners are seeking to undermine the Second Amendment and the legislative process by seeking to bankrupt firearms and ammunition manufacturers or get gun control restrictions through the courts through dozens of pending municipal lawsuits -- blaming the gun industry for the acts of criminals -- initiated by anti-gun big city mayors and greedy trial lawyers. A single judgment by a rogue judge or jury could wipe out the entire firearms industry making our gun rights worthless. Passage of S. 1805 is critical -- but not worth allowing legislation going to the President including either an extension of the Clinton gun ban or restrictions at gun shows. There will be no compromise. The only choice is a "clean" bill or no bill.

The legislative process in Congress is complex and far from perfect. Fortunately, Congress is a bicameral (two house) legislative body and both the House and Senate must agree on the same bill before enactment. While we are uncertain of the outcome of several pending anti-gun amendments in the Senate, the House is strongly pro-gun and it (or a conference committee) will not accept any anti-gun Senate- passed amendment as part of the final product to be sent to the President.

Pro-gun grassroots activists who want to advance our cause should not be distracted by misinformation and disinformation by our "friends." Instead, gun owners and sportsmen must keep our focus on the real action and contact -- by calls, e-mails, and faxes -- their two U.S. Senators urging them to vote for S. 1805 and against any and all anti- gun "poison pill" killer amendments including, but not limited to, the Clinton gun ban and gun shows. Use the "Write Your Representatives" (www.capwiz.com/nra/home) tool at www.NRAILA.org to contact your Senators and call them at 202-224-3121. We appreciate your active support in our cause to defend the Second Amendment and freedom itself.


TOPICS: Announcements
KEYWORDS: bang; firearms
FYI
1 posted on 02/27/2004 6:59:39 PM PST by kimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kimber
I am the NRA, and our leadership position on this is a sell out, I have seen the enemy, and it is I.
2 posted on 02/27/2004 7:16:40 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Today, I spoke with Jill in Senator Craig's Washington office. I asked her, "if the Senator was sponsoring a bill that regulated armor piecing ammunition?" Jill told me that "Senator Craig is sponsoring a, (paused while she looked for the paper) a Bill with Senator Frisk that would "regulate the sale and possesion of armor piercing ammunition", she also said that, "I should be aware the Senator is very pro gun and a supporter of the NRA". I said, "Yes, I am aware of his history with the NRA and his position as a Director." We then exchanged pleasantries and said, goodbye to each other.

NRA Director Sen. Larry Craig's Ammunition Ban Amendment (SA 2625)

Friends are becoming scarce as the election draws near. I expected a lot of backstabbing but nothing like this from the NRA Directors.

3 posted on 02/27/2004 7:16:56 PM PST by B4Ranch (Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.--Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
Call the Director/Senators office and let him know just what you think of the NRA stabbing us in the back with the Senators Ammunition Ban Amendment (SA 2625) for "The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (S1805)"

NRA Director/Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) (202) 224-2752

4 posted on 02/27/2004 7:26:40 PM PST by B4Ranch (Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.--Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Just to clear the crap off the table, I am a pro-Second Amendment individual, not a part of any pro-Second Amendment group that is spreading rumors mentioned in the article above.
5 posted on 02/27/2004 7:31:01 PM PST by B4Ranch (Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.--Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; All
http://www.senate.gov

what he said

6 posted on 02/27/2004 11:06:12 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
You am the NRA? I don't think so.
7 posted on 03/01/2004 10:00:39 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson