I doubt you're going to see this on the Mainstream media so I wrote my own.
1 posted on
02/29/2004 7:08:15 AM PST by
tbeatty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: tbeatty
But of course, that's not news...
To: tbeatty
This wasn't a banner headline in the NYT's?.
Or is the Master's protest coming up again?
To: tbeatty
I'm sure TDIDS
To: tbeatty
Thank you for the facts. I was just thinking this the other day, but I wasn't sure whether I was just succumbing to wishful thinking or if there really had been fewer attacks.
As you say, the mainstream media certainly couldn't be bothered to tell us this.
5 posted on
02/29/2004 7:12:12 AM PST by
livius
To: tbeatty
I know that keeping casualty statistics is necessary, but to flaunt anything about them is, to me, not good karma.
6 posted on
02/29/2004 7:15:15 AM PST by
leadpenny
To: tbeatty
this it had something to do with capturing Sadaam??
naaaaa
7 posted on
02/29/2004 7:15:55 AM PST by
raloxk
To: tbeatty
Good news.
I figured this was the case since it's been a couple weeks since I've heard the 'death a day' mantra spewing from the leftists.
9 posted on
02/29/2004 7:28:28 AM PST by
StriperSniper
(Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
To: tbeatty
On US KIA:
10 posted on
02/29/2004 7:34:33 AM PST by
optimistically_conservative
(If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous. T.B.)
To: tbeatty
Someone must be draining the quagmire.
11 posted on
02/29/2004 7:35:48 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Not Fonda Kerry")
To: tbeatty
The reality that they lost the war (again) is begining to sink in.
12 posted on
02/29/2004 7:36:22 AM PST by
ChadGore
("Maybe they thought Saddam would lose the next Iraqi election")
To: tbeatty
Thanks for posting this. The Lunaville site does appear to have comprehensive statistics. The number of wounded is way down too.
If trends continue, Iraq will not be the issue the Dems are hoping for.
14 posted on
02/29/2004 7:37:19 AM PST by
Plutarch
To: tbeatty
In the last year, the city of baltimore had about 300 murders
15 posted on
02/29/2004 7:51:01 AM PST by
staytrue
To: tbeatty
This is really going to disappoint the hard left in the Democrat party, like the DUmmies, for instance.
20 posted on
02/29/2004 8:31:33 AM PST by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
To: tbeatty
Really good news. Still not perfect. Of course, zero deaths is best.
Wonder how the losses in Iraq compare to the number of violent deaths in the U.S. per day. Probably not an apple-apples comparison but a way to show that the situation in Iraq isn't that bad.
21 posted on
02/29/2004 8:40:19 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: tbeatty
Good news bump!
23 posted on
02/29/2004 8:49:01 AM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: tbeatty
The report is in ERROR. There have been 380 lost due to HOSTILE fire. 549 total and 380 by HOSTILE FIRE. This is up through FEB 28.
Look here24 posted on
02/29/2004 8:55:41 AM PST by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: tbeatty
We must be doing something right.
To: tbeatty
It certainly appears that things are really quieting down in Iraq -- I mentioned to my wife yesterday that it's been quite awhile since we've heard of any large-scale attacks in Iraq. The left won't cover this at all, prefering to raise the S.F. mayor up as some kind of saint and disparage Mel Gibson as some kind of Hitler. Thankfully, they mostly just talk to themselves.
To: tbeatty
To: tbeatty
"B-b-but......." "Yeah!!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
