Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALLING SEAN PENN & JIM MC'DERMOTT... -- Anti-Imperialist Hypocrisy At Its Finest!
ICONOCLAST.CA ^ | S. Rittenberg

Posted on 02/29/2004 10:06:05 AM PST by BurkesLaw

While the Democrats continue their temper tantrums over our failure to enlist the U.N in our war on Saddam, our success in that war is exposing extraordinary depths of corruption. The high-minded UN diplomats, actors and journalists who prattled on endlessly about the horrors of "Bush's war" turn out to have been in the pocket of Saddam....

(Excerpt) Read more at iconoclast.ca ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofweasels; lyingliars; oilforfood; payola; saddamites; un; unfailure; unitednations
Diplomatic payola among the political left.
1 posted on 02/29/2004 10:06:06 AM PST by BurkesLaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurkesLaw
Anti-American demoCommiecRATS = one truly sad, bad Freak Show!!!!
2 posted on 02/29/2004 10:07:28 AM PST by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurkesLaw
In case people didn't see the report on Fox, there was a British (accent) guy saying that he was shocked to learn that those nations/states which were strongly against the USA going into Iraq, were the same nations/states who were taking the handouts from Saddam.

THIS WAS A STUNNING ADMISSION!! Of course, we already knew - but which the mainstream media has tried to hide this information from the public.

Too late .. now it's out there.
3 posted on 02/29/2004 12:10:13 PM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurkesLaw
While the Democrats continue their temper tantrums over our failure to enlist the U.N in our war on Saddam,

Flashback! Excerpt from Kerry on CrossFire in 1997 (Kerry RIPS into France, et al)

SUNUNU: But isn't what he has seen is a loss of U.S. leadership and an erosion under an administration that has failed to lead?

KERRY: On the contrary. The administration is leading. The administration is making it clear that they don't believe that they even need the U.N. Security Council to sign off on a material breach because the finding of material breach was made by Mr. Butler. So furthermore, I think the United States has always reserved the right and will reserve the right to act in its best interests. And clearly it is not just our best interests, it is in the best interests of the world to make it clear to Saddam Hussein that he's not going to get away with a breach of the '91 agreement that he's got to live up to, which is allowing inspections and dismantling his weapons and allowing us to know that he has dismantled his weapons. That's the price he pays for invading Kuwait and starting a war.


4 posted on 02/29/2004 4:26:48 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurkesLaw
February 28, 2004: While the Democrats continue their temper tantrums over our failure to enlist the U.N in our war on Saddam, our success in that war is exposing extraordinary depths of corruption. The high-minded UN diplomats, actors and journalists who prattled on endlessly about the horrors of "Bush's war" turn out to have been in the pocket of Saddam. Here's how the NY Times describes this egregious syndrome:

"...In the high-flying days after Iraq was allowed to sell its oil after 10 years of United Nations sanctions, the lobby of the Rashid Hotel in Baghdad was the place to be to get a piece of the action.

That was where the oil traders would gather whenever a journalist, actor or political figure would arrive in Iraq and openly praise Mr. Hussein. Experience taught them that the visitor usually returned to the hotel with a gift voucher, courtesy of the Iraqi president or one of his aides, representing the right to buy one million barrels or more of Iraqi crude.

The vouchers had considerable value. With the major oil companies monopolizing most Persian Gulf oil, there was fierce competition among smaller traders for the chance to buy Iraqi oil. And as long as Iraq kept its oil prices low enough, traders could make a tidy profit, even after buying the voucher and paying the surcharge.

"We used to joke that if you get one million barrels, you could make $200,000," Mr. Faraj, of SOMO, added, referring to a period when the vouchers sold for about 20 cents per barrel. "And yet the ones who got it were those people who used to come here and praise Saddam for his stand against imperialism..."

Will the righteous idealists of the anti-war movement ever fail to live down to our low expectations?

Stephen Rittenberg, Co-Publisher, Horsefeathers
5 posted on 02/29/2004 4:31:10 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just a ping!
6 posted on 02/29/2004 6:25:58 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Ted Kennedy -- if he'd been driving a VW, he'd be president today. [old Nat Lamp fake ad])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson