Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NO MEL GIBSON AT OSCARS
DRUDGE REPORT ^ | Sun Feb 29 2004 13:01:38 ET

Posted on 02/29/2004 10:10:05 AM PST by Brian Mosely

NO MEL GIBSON AT OSCARS

Sun Feb 29 2004 13:01:38 ET

A major no-show at tonight's Academy Awards in Hollywood will be Mel Gibson.

The Executive Producer of the program, Joe Roth asked the filmmaker of PASSION OF THE CHRIST to present an award, knowing it would create unforgettable sparks.

The LA TIMES reports that Gibson let the offer expire because, Roth says, he was afraid of being booed.

His representatives said Gibson was too busy to attend because it was the movie's opening weekend.

Developing...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hollywoodleft; melgibson; oscars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last
To: Kieri
Sean Astin was on "Fox and Friends" this week talking about the Oscars and his family. When the subject of politics came up, he was extremely careful not to say anything that could indicate which way he leans. I had the feeling he was either 1) a liberal, knew conservatives watch the show and didn't want to get blasted, or 2) he was sensitive about the subject for some reason. If Sean got misquoted and hammered for it, that would explain why he appeared to be walking on eggshells.

Thanks for that info. Sean Astin was appointed by President Bush to a commsission on public service, so if he hated Bush, he wouldn't be picked for the commission, or serve on it. And Astin's been quoted in the past as calling himself a Republican. I think you're right, though, that he was walking on eggshells. I can't blame anybody in Hollywood to the right of Susan Sarandon for trying to keep their politics quiet -- as we've seen with Mel Gibson, Hollywood is perfectly willing to have their own little blacklists for people who don't think like them.

181 posted on 02/29/2004 1:20:31 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
By now, anyone with half a brain knows where Mels heart is at.

To present an award at the "Oscars" would be a tacit admission of support for the demented Hollyweird self congradulatory
soiree.
182 posted on 02/29/2004 1:24:42 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
The Oscars won't be on my television because they are afraid of being booed.
183 posted on 02/29/2004 1:34:37 PM PST by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
The LA TIMES reports that Gibson let the offer expire because, Roth says, he was afraid of being booed.

Does anyone else have an issue with how this sentence is constructed? Did the LA Times say that Mel was afraid of being booed or did Roth? Or was Roth quoting the Times?

Also, does anyone reeeeaallly think that Roth and the Awards staff wouldn't do anything they could to ask Mel again at least for the ratings they know they would get and even though the "deadline has expired?

184 posted on 02/29/2004 2:26:16 PM PST by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
My guess:

USA 350 million

International 500,000,000

Primary, secondary and tertiary markets....total

$1,150,000,000
185 posted on 02/29/2004 2:30:39 PM PST by international american (Kerry has hired a full time clerk to keep track of his lies..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: philetus
To present an award at the "Oscars" would be a tacit admission of support for the demented Hollyweird self congradulatory soiree.

Really. Mel Gibson is much bigger than Hollywood, it would be ridiculous for him to be there handing out awards to silly celebrities. Sort of like showing up on some celebrity game show.

186 posted on 02/29/2004 2:50:44 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Mel's sending that message, isn't he? But it could be interpreted as cowardice.

It could be interpreted as a snub ---- but Gibson is too high up for them to think he's wasting his time snubbing them. No one in all of Hollywood comes close to Mel Gibson anymore.

187 posted on 02/29/2004 2:53:10 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Gibson has better things to do than to watch a bunch of self-centered, egotistical, godless people engage in a 4 hour orgy among themselves.

I have better things to do too. (But then, I've never watched the Oscars...)

188 posted on 02/29/2004 3:32:18 PM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago; Guenevere; Samwise
"...He was misquoted..."

Then I stand corrected. I thought that he was one of those in the ensemble that had a few choice words to say about the Bush Administration's foreign policy.

189 posted on 02/29/2004 6:08:33 PM PST by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I suspect that Mel smelled a setup, and didn't oblige.

It wouldn't have been just booing. I'm sure some people would have made plans to walk out en masse as soon as he took the stage (as happened with Elia Kazan). The cameras would have been told to follow the walkout. The implict message that would have gone out to the world is, "the people who know Gibson best don't want to have anything to do with him." He was smart to stay home (and as one poster earlier put it, "count his money.")

190 posted on 02/29/2004 6:43:06 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Mel Gibson does not need hissywood, but based on the success of his movie, hissywood may need Mel Gibson.
191 posted on 02/29/2004 6:59:46 PM PST by Vision Thing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
If anything, there would be a standing ovation for Mel lasting a full three minutes.

I wish I thought you were right. People may support Mel in their hearts but they aren't about to do it in public for the quite justified fear they'd never work again. Look how few actors spoke up on Mel's behalf--Chuck Norris, Robert Downey Jr. and there was one more whose name I forget. That's how scared people are. Mel is a well loved actor but nobody is going to support him on this, especially at the Oscars.

Because there is so much support for Gibson at Free Republic we like to think we're winning the culture war over "The Passion of the Christ." We're not. The people who rely on the mainstream media, which is to say most of the country, are relentelessly pushing the notion that Mel collaborated with Goebbels to make a Nazi splatter flic.

192 posted on 02/29/2004 7:04:02 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Stewart_B
This is a certain gentleman named Eastwood who wanted Mr Gibson to attend. I believe he might just say something kinda unexpected tonight.

It would really be classy if Eastwood spoke up for Mel. But pessimist that I am I'm not holding my breath. My guess is that no one will have the courage to speak up on Me's behalf.

193 posted on 02/29/2004 7:10:23 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DentsRun
Is it so that they wanted him as a presenter?

If so maybe it would have been a set up. Can you see it..

Mel getting up to present the best picture to: "Lord" of Rings... That would have been an insult considering Mel's conviction as to who the "Lord" is..
194 posted on 02/29/2004 7:11:59 PM PST by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
Already many people, including those who are no big fans of Gibson, are outraged at the false attacks on him.

I wish that were true but so far to my knowledge only three Hollywood stars (Robert Doney Jr., Chuck Norris and forget the third) have spoken up on Gibson's behalf. If he appeared at the Oscars and people started booing, no one would defend Gibson. They'd be too afraid they'd never work again.

195 posted on 02/29/2004 7:14:46 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Total brain fart! I was even picturing Streep as I typed it.

Most of the comments during the telecast were pretty tame. I was surprised at the way Billy Crystal went after Mel Gibson right off the bat. Judging by the audience's lukewarm reception to his "jokes," I'm not at all surprised he stopped making them after just a few barbs.

I was not at all surprised by Sean Penn's comment about WMDs. Nor was I surprised that the orchestra cut off the creator of the documentary "Two Soldiers" when he started making his very pro-military comments.

196 posted on 03/01/2004 5:33:07 AM PST by grellis (Che cosa ha mangiato?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
He may say he is a Republican, but Sean Astin has an McAwfull lot of Democrat friends.
197 posted on 03/01/2004 11:46:20 AM PST by Paradox (Cogito ergo Womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
When was the last time Mel Gibson was at the Academy Awards anyway?
198 posted on 03/01/2004 11:52:47 AM PST by CalKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Yikes! I wasn't aware of that.
199 posted on 03/01/2004 12:12:22 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Joe Roth Named Telecast Producer for 76th Academy Awards

200 posted on 03/01/2004 12:32:33 PM PST by handk (The moon belongs to America, and anxiously awaits our Astro-Men. Will you be among them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson