Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Passion' shakes North Jersey clergy to the core
The Record of Hackensack ^ | 02.29.04

Posted on 02/29/2004 5:59:33 PM PST by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last
http://www.stjoesmendham.org
 
klasch@stjoesmendham.org

1 posted on 02/29/2004 5:59:33 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
`
2 posted on 02/29/2004 6:00:00 PM PST by Coleus (Help Tyler Schicke http://tylerfund.org/ Burkitt's leukemia, http://www.birthhaven.org/needs.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
that it was the Jews

It wasn't THE Jews, it was SOME Jews.

3 posted on 02/29/2004 6:02:31 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
I guess this priest believes the crucifixion was really just primarily comprised of harsh words.
4 posted on 02/29/2004 6:06:21 PM PST by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
It was US!!!!

God/Jesus is TIMELESS!!!

What happened 2,000 years ago is the same that is happening today. It was me who persecuted Christ.
5 posted on 02/29/2004 6:07:32 PM PST by baltodog (So, can we assume that a job that an illegal alien won't do must be REALLY bad?....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
I guess this priest believes the crucifixion was really just primarily comprised of harsh words.

Much worse than that - the Romans gave Jesus a "time-out."

6 posted on 02/29/2004 6:09:14 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"I saw it as religious barbarism ... in my opinion, God did not send his son to die,'' said Lasch, of St. Joseph's Church of Mendham. "God sent his son to live, to be faithful. And in being faithful, it cost him his life.''

Lasch, who saw the movie Thursday, also said the film's uncompromising, in-your-face approach reflects a growing divisiveness and belligerence within the major religions.

I say bully for the in-your-face approach. I'm so sick of listening to priests like Lasch that I have really have no words. As far as I'm concerned, they can GET OUT.

7 posted on 02/29/2004 6:09:44 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Coleus
The Rev. Kenneth Lasch, a veteran Catholic priest, said he was repelled...."God sent his son to live, to be faithful. And in being faithful, it cost him his life.''

The good Father better put down John Paul Sartre's books and read his catechism a bit more closely...Jesus willingly died to redeem the sins of humanity...not just because he was fated to do it. Sounds like the padre has been reading too must existentialism.

9 posted on 02/29/2004 6:10:47 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
NJ Catholic priest appalled by "The Passion'' he described the film as "religious barbarism."

One must wonder what this Catholic priest thought of the abuse that was visited upon Jesus Christ. Was it not "barbarism?"

10 posted on 02/29/2004 6:10:59 PM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures.

1 Corinthians 15:3
11 posted on 02/29/2004 6:11:08 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"I saw it as religious barbarism ... in my opinion, God did not send his son to die,'' said Lasch, of St. Joseph's Church of Mendham. "God sent his son to live, to be faithful. And in being faithful, it cost him his life.'

God didn't send his son to die? This Catholic priest doesn't believe in the Bible. Odd no?
12 posted on 02/29/2004 6:11:51 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
6 out of a possible 10. 'Glad I got to see it.
13 posted on 02/29/2004 6:12:16 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Something tells me that this priest would be offended by Christ Himself.
14 posted on 02/29/2004 6:13:18 PM PST by William Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"As I was sitting at the end of movie I thought, 'This is not bringing us together,''' he said. "This is increasing the separation.''

Just like the good sheep and the bad sheep will be separated at the end of the world, eh Rev?

15 posted on 02/29/2004 6:14:59 PM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
"in my opinion, God did not send his son to die"

I think the problem with this statement starts in the first three words.

16 posted on 02/29/2004 6:18:41 PM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flying Circus
ping
17 posted on 02/29/2004 6:19:48 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.yadvashem.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; LibreOuMort
Meanwhile, a rabbi from River Edge said the movie could bring Jews and Christians closer, despite the film's insistence that it was the Jews who pushed for the execution of Jesus.

I will somewhat echo the poster who said it is not THE Jews, it was at best SOME Jews! (There are plenty of other readings, including that Jesus' actions leading to the execution call us all to account -- if he died for our sins, are we not at fault? If he died because the Jews pushed for execution, then where in that is the salvation for the Gentiles?)

And look further at the movie itself: It was a Jew who protested the council's actions, it was a Jew who asserted Jesus' innocence before the council, they were Jews who called upon the soldiers to stop, it was a Jew(ish woman) who tried to bring Jesus the cup, it was a Jew who carried Jesus' cross and eventually, lovingly, Jesus himself as he "walked a mile in His shoes."

18 posted on 02/29/2004 6:20:12 PM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Not really that odd. Just because one stands in a garage doesn't mean one is a car.
19 posted on 02/29/2004 6:20:28 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Yea, they ignore that some of the jews were disgusted by the railroading and refused to take part.
20 posted on 02/29/2004 6:21:04 PM PST by Bogey78O (The Democrats promised jobs but all they gave you was gay marriage- AppyPappy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson