Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists counter Bush view: Families varied, say anthropologists
SFGate ^ | Feb. 27, 2004 | Charles Burress

Posted on 02/29/2004 6:41:00 PM PST by DemWatch

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The primary organization representing American anthropologists criticized President Bush's proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage Thursday and gave a failing grade to the president's understanding of human cultures.

"The results of more than a century of anthropological research on households, kinship relationships and families, across cultures and through time, provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution," said the executive board of the 11,000-member American Anthropological Association.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: academia; civilunion; delusional; homosexualagenda; marriage; subversives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 02/29/2004 6:41:01 PM PST by DemWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Headline: "Liberal F-ggot snobs Bash Bush"
2 posted on 02/29/2004 6:44:18 PM PST by Betaille (Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
This is a bogus propaganda piece from the "Queer Mafia" (their term, not mine). It is a complete lie.
3 posted on 02/29/2004 6:44:35 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Lots of these anthropologists come up with these stories to justify themselves to the young women they are hitting on every time they get out in the bush working on a grant!

Guess that makes them experts on what the President ought to say. Seems like we just got rid of a President who spent all his time thinkin like an anthropoligist on a field trip.

4 posted on 02/29/2004 6:45:05 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Exactly. They just make this stuff up. There has never been such a thing as recognized Christian same-sex marriages. This is complete garbage.
5 posted on 02/29/2004 6:47:35 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Segal pointed to "sanctified same-sex unions in the fourth century in Christianity" and to the Greeks and Romans applying the concept of marriage to same-sex couples, not to mention the Native American berdache tradition in which males married males.

Christianity NEVER sanctified homosexual unions. To imply that "blood-brother" relationships were sexual in nature is dishonest. The Greeks and the Romans were accepting of homosexuality, but NEVER considered marriage as other than heterosexual. The Native Americans were not part of Western Civilization.

So much for these "scientists".

6 posted on 02/29/2004 6:47:48 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Maybe one of these pink doctors should run for office.
7 posted on 02/29/2004 6:47:48 PM PST by reed_inthe_wind (Vienna said the middlemen come from Ger, Nether,Belg, S Af, Jap,Dub, Mal,USA,Rus,Chin,and Pak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
oh rats rear .............
8 posted on 02/29/2004 6:48:33 PM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Nader, who is an association member, said Bush's proposal "serves the views of the religious right, and that has to do with getting votes."

As opposed to appeasing members of the secular and immoral Left who won't vote for him regardless?

9 posted on 02/29/2004 6:49:00 PM PST by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Oh yeah, If someone from Berkeley says it's so, then it must be true.
10 posted on 02/29/2004 6:49:12 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
LOL! Tell the anthropologist that they wouldn't be anthropologist if the species couldn't procreate.

LOL.

5.56mm

11 posted on 02/29/2004 6:49:21 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Anthropology is not a science, it is documented gossip! The most wonderful thing was learning that Margaret Meads' book "Coming of Age in Samoa (I think)" was based on tall tales the natives told her because they were embarrased by her questions!
12 posted on 02/29/2004 6:49:27 PM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
"Fabrication" is just not laudry detergent cleansing process.
13 posted on 02/29/2004 6:51:44 PM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
And as everyone knows, scientists are never wrong.
RIGHT!!(sarcasm)
14 posted on 02/29/2004 6:52:15 PM PST by airborne (lead by example)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
gal pointed to "sanctified same-sex unions in the fourth century in Christianity" and to the Greeks and Romans applying the concept of marriage to same-sex couples, not to mention the Native American berdache tradition in which males married males.
Neither the Greeks nor the Romans applied the "concept of marriage to same-sex couples." And what heterodox proto-Christian, most likely grrr-nostic sect "sanctified same-sex unions?" And who ever heard of the Native American "berdache tradition?" Were these unions the norm? Or simply normal? Or what?

This academic rube is reaching, and his or her reach exceeds his or her grasp.
15 posted on 02/29/2004 6:53:10 PM PST by Asclepius (karma vigilante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy
Yes, homosexual marraige has been the bedrock of civilization throughout all of history. The Berkeley Queer Mafia has spoken the complete scientific truth. </bullfeces>
16 posted on 02/29/2004 6:53:29 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
If any of this daydream were true, it would have been blasted on headlines thirty years ago. Nice try, you fagging twits, but no sale here.

17 posted on 02/29/2004 6:55:08 PM PST by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
Right! There's evidence in literature for marrying you mother and in history for marrying your sister, but it's still not a good idea to model your life after Oedipus or Caligula.
18 posted on 02/29/2004 6:56:06 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Funny how he did not name any of these famous same-sex couples. As the old saying goes, "Behind every great man is -- uh, er -- another man."
19 posted on 02/29/2004 6:56:45 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DemWatch
What a bunch of goof-balls!
20 posted on 02/29/2004 6:57:21 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson