Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed Says Economy Continuing to Expand - "OUR COUNTRY HAS NO ECONOMIC STRATEGY" - HILLARY
Springfield News Sun ^ | 3/3/04 | Jeannine Aversa

Posted on 03/03/2004 2:20:59 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Factories hummed and consumers kept cash registers busy in the first two months of this year, fresh evidence the economic recovery is moving ahead, according to a Federal Reserve report Wednesday.

``Economic activity continued to expand in January and February,'' the Fed said in its latest survey of business conditions around the country. On the jobs front, however, the report found employment ``growing slowly'' in most central bank districts.

A separate survey of chief executives of the nation's biggest companies suggested hiring could start to pick up. One-third of the executives said they expected to increase hiring in the next six months, while 22 expected to cut payrolls and 45 percent expected no change, according to a Business Roundtable survey.

The association said that is the first time since the fall of 2002 that a larger share of executives planned to add to payrolls rather than cut them.

``America's CEOs believe that the U.S. economy is on course for continued steady improvement over the next six months,'' said Hank McKinnell, chairman of the Business Roundtable and Pfizer Inc.'s chairman and chief executive.

In the Fed report, factory activity rose in 11 of the 12 regional Fed districts, good news for America's manufacturers, who were hardest hit by the 2001 recession and have struggled mightily to get back on firm footing. In the Fed's Cleveland region factory activity didn't go up, but rather held steady, the Fed survey said.

Even with the pickup in factory activity, manufacturers have lost 3 million jobs since July 2000. That's the month factory employment peaked as the economy was enjoying a record-long expansion.

The lackluster jobs climate is a sore spot for President Bush, and the Democrats are trying to use it as an election-year issue.

``I don't think our country has an economic strategy,'' said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who urged the administration to take steps reverse the loss of manufacturing jobs.

The Fed report also said that consumer spending on general merchandise rose in most of the Fed's regions except for St. Louis, which reported a slight decline.

Strong or strengthening sales were reported for the New York, Richmond and the Dallas regions. Sales growth was moderate in the Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Minneapolis, Kansas City and San Francisco districts. Retailers in Cleveland said sales met or exceeded expectations. In the Atlanta region, sales moderated a bit in February but were up from the same month a year ago, the Fed said.

However, it said that nearly all regions reported slower auto sales in January and February compared to a year ago.

Activity in the service sector also expanded in January and February. Boston and St. Louis, for instance, saw stronger demand for information technology services.

The report, dubbed the Beige Book for the color of its cover, will be used as a basis for discussion when central bank policy-makers meet on March 16.

Overall, ``it's a good report card for the economy,'' said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

Most economists, including Hoffman, expect the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee to hold rates steady at a 45-year low of 1 percent at the March meeting.

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan on Tuesday said that extra-low short-term interest rates eventually will have to go up. He gave no clue when.

Since last June, the Fed's main lever to influence economic activity, called the federal funds rate, has been at 1 percent. Near rock-bottom short-term interest rates have helped motivate consumers and businesses to spend and invest, an important factor to lift economic growth.

Some economists believe the Fed will start to push up rates this year. Others don't believe higher rates will come until 2005.

On the employment front, the Fed's Boston region indicated that temporary-help agencies were placing more workers in manufacturing, software development and government. Employment agencies in New York indicated that they have been experiencing gradual increases in demand.

Agriculture conditions, meanwhile, were mixed in the first two months of the year, the Fed said. Demand for beef appeared to be recovering from the effects of the nation's first case of mad cow disease. But U.S. exports of poultry have been hurt by the outbreak of avian influenza, the Fed said.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushrecovery; economy; hillary; hillaryclinton; upstateny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2004 2:20:59 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lord...no economic strategy...tax cuts, spending increases, the fed peddle to the metal on money supply...there has never been such a concerted effort to get the economy roaring in my memory.
2 posted on 03/03/2004 2:23:09 PM PST by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Meanwhile Hillary think cutting taxes on buisnesses would help in upstate NY. (of course she would creata another wasteful task study to research ways to create jobs..paid for by raising federal taxes).


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089975/posts

The senator argued for the creation of an across-the-board 10-percent cut in corporate taxes for American factories in order to retain and attract jobs that might otherwise go overseas.

Randall Wolken, president of the Manufacturers Association of Central New York, disagreed with Clinton's assessment the current administration has been fatalistic.

"I do believe we have a major challenge that we need to address," Wolken said. "We need to be much more proactive and much less reactive."

Wolken said a tax cut for U.S.-based production would encourage and protect domestic manufacturing, but he was more skeptical of the creation of a new federal agency, arguing it is more important to get the government to aggressively retain and attract jobs.

Clinton said the proposed expanded research effort could be funded by postponing tax cuts supported by the Bush administration.

3 posted on 03/03/2004 2:25:02 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
To be honest I don't want the government to have an "economic strategy" per se.
4 posted on 03/03/2004 2:26:39 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
``I don't think our country has an economic strategy,'' said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who urged the administration to take steps reverse the loss of manufacturing jobs. "

How odd that she didn't provide any suggestions on how to do that. Why, she must not have any....or she does and she's not about to share them for the good of the nation, because she only cares about partisan politics.....or she's full of cowchips.

Correct answer? All of the above.

5 posted on 03/03/2004 2:26:50 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
Why doesn't Hillary release her 5 year plan?
6 posted on 03/03/2004 2:28:06 PM PST by MCRD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spyone
An economic strategy....that's what they have in the Euro-zone, and see what a success that's been! </sarcasm off>
7 posted on 03/03/2004 2:29:41 PM PST by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MCRD
Why doesn't Hillary release her 5 year plan?

Indeed. Let's hear how many tractors she wants to build!

8 posted on 03/03/2004 2:30:18 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
That's because economic strategies are for directed economies, "directed economy" being a nice way of saying communism.
9 posted on 03/03/2004 2:31:34 PM PST by discostu (but this one has 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
[...reverse the loss of manufacturing jobs.] How odd that she didn't provide any suggestions on how to do that. Why, she must not have any....or she does and she's not about to share them for the good of the nation, because she only cares about partisan politics.....or she's full of cowchips.

But isn't it obvious? The way to reverse the loss of manufacturing jobs, indeed to solve any problem, is to "focus like a laser on" that problem. Problem solved. That's how her husband did such a great job with The Economy. Right?

10 posted on 03/03/2004 2:31:41 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
"Why doesn't Hillary release her 5 year plan?"

Just get any book at a library labled "Communism 101" and there you have it.
11 posted on 03/03/2004 2:34:54 PM PST by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
P.S. I've observed recently that a particular type of job, the "manufacturing job", has been singled out for special mention as a Type of job which is particularly important and crucial to worry about. Is it just because (D)s looked at the data and saw that job-loss for this particular Type of job was larger than for others? Or is there some intrinsic reason why we should necessarily care more about this Type of job than all other jobs put together, that I'm unaware of?

Hell with all the focus on "manufacturing jobs" as being the Most Important jobs in the world, I'm almost tempted to quit my current job and try to get one of 'em. They must be GREAT jobs to have if they're that important!!

12 posted on 03/03/2004 2:35:03 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
Sure thing. Heck, she'll be on to a fundraising dinner tonight, then healthcare tomorrow, and Head Start funding by evening. Real laser-like on the issues, she is.....
13 posted on 03/03/2004 2:38:08 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
SHUT UP HITLERY. Go take a trip around the block on your broom.
14 posted on 03/03/2004 2:38:44 PM PST by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
>>manufacturers have lost 3 million jobs since July 2000

Nice to see how the Dims arrive at that number! It means they are crediting BUSH with those crashing numbers from SIX MONTHS BEFORE GW TOOK OFFICE. (The downturn occurred in the Clinton administration).

And I'll bet that 3 million figure ALSO does not represent TODAY's economy, but keeps repeating whatever were the worst-case numbers when it bottomed out early last year.

15 posted on 03/03/2004 2:39:53 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCRD
Why doesn't Hillary release her 5 year plan?

That is easy to answer. She doesn't have one

16 posted on 03/03/2004 2:42:21 PM PST by Kaslin (It is now more important then ever that we re-elect President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
The connotation of "manufacturing job" is "union dues". Some people are still living in the past, when union support meant good things for a politician. Apparently, all these people were asleep when Dick Gephardt was endorsed by the largest and most powerful of the mid-20th century powerhouse unions - and promptly got blown out in the Iowa caucus. Kind of like fighting the last war.
17 posted on 03/03/2004 2:42:22 PM PST by White Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"The senator argued for the creation of an across-the-board 10-percent cut in corporate taxes for American factories in order to retain and attract jobs that might otherwise go overseas. "

Let me get this straight. It's ok to use tax cuts to stimulate the economy when manufacturing is involved but it's bad to give ME a tax cut so I can go out in the marketplace and buy stuff.
All tax cuts are stimulative to the economy. Why pick and choose?

18 posted on 03/03/2004 2:45:16 PM PST by iceskater (No nation or state ever taxed itself into prosperity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
To be honest I don't want the government to have an "economic strategy" per se.

You and I both. Private industries should have their economic strategies and if they are allowed to do what they do best, the governments economic "strategy" will be handed to them.

I have serious concerns about a government that thinks it can pick and chose which industry to favor - only the market can do that and the feds should stay out of its way.

19 posted on 03/03/2004 2:45:48 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Why doesn't Hillary release her 5 year plan?

That is easy to answer. She doesn't have one

Sure she has a plan. All the money you earn belongs to the government she wants to run.

20 posted on 03/03/2004 2:47:20 PM PST by iceskater (No nation or state ever taxed itself into prosperity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson