Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
That's decided, then.

Not so fast!

There is the consideration that you might end up 'blocking' other users in the satellite belt with the size antenna that is required -

- and the 'space drag' (from solar particles) on a large antenna may also prevent you from staying on-station in your orbital slot ...

The real answer, I think, to 500 mile 'detection' of aircraft with today's processing/computer power is the use of OTH HF RADAR as I mentioned previously ... then there is the possibility of 'stealth' being used ... RADAR absorbing materials/LO (Low Observables) designs aren't near as likely to work with HF (2 - 30 MHz) RF energy as with RF in the microwave spectrum ...

45 posted on 03/05/2004 6:19:08 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: _Jim
'blocking' other users in the satellite belt

The price of security. But by the time such a huge antenna were built 1000 miles across, the terrorists would be dead of old age or work-related accidents, and their children would view their parents as hopeless and it might all be over anyway.

46 posted on 03/05/2004 6:28:46 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson