Posted on 03/06/2004 5:14:35 PM PST by DugwayDuke
If he has disclosed the conflict to both the Trust and to the County, and they have granted waivers, he is probably in the clear on the ethics issues.
I saw on a response to someone else you indicated that the names matched. If you haven't done so, you can check here
http://www.alabar.org/directory/dirSearch.cfm
to see if there are other lawyers by that name in the state.
One final point - have they tried to get a Tennessee address? I know of one case of a man living near a state line who had his address in one state, but actually resided in an adjacent state. It caused minor legal complications, but nothing that couldn't be dealt with.
That's one reason why the relationship of the county attorneys and the land trust of north alabama is so suspicious.
Some back room land dealing going on? I sincerely wish you luck, Dugway. I have recently begun a job working with local government and have moments of both being pleased and appalled.
It's been a long time since I first started this thread and it's time for an update.
Essentially, the letter from the county commission stated that they couldn't locate the right of way connecting the property to the private road. We initiated a survey and had deeds recorded that incorporated the right of way. We then reapplied for the house numbers in August. After receiving no response, we reappeared before the county commission (twice). Some one on the county commission (I don't know exactly which commissioner intervened with the county attorney but the attorney's comments indicated that at least one had.) We now have our house numbers.
The county commission has decried that a committee of 'interested' parties will meet in January to address the policy for granting house numbers.
There were two issues from the commissions perspective. First, they want the authority to zone the county, something that has been refused by the state legislature and which lost soundly in a referendum. Second, the county wants to limit growth where that growth would be inconvienient for the county to provide services. We had to agree that the county would not be obligated to provide basic services such as trash pickup and 9/11 services.
Thanks for the update. Glad they got what they needed. Interesting legal question as to whether the county can contract away its obligations to provide emergency services. (And one that I don't know the answer to.)
In many districts, they will force you to tear it down if there is no recorded permit.
Sounds like a case of illegal subdivision. Do it right.
It sounds sort of resolved, but unfortunately simply issuing house numbers is a pragmatic act for safety reasons not associated with legally subdividing the land. The county officials do not understand their position function.
In a perfect world, one would simply walk in to the proper office and say, "No house number? No property tax."
Glad to hear your family(s) got their house numbers and can get on with their plans. I don't see any problem with the above as long as they don't restrict your ability to burn your garbage or keep and bear firearms. The latter part regarding 911 services - are those services reporting services (answering a 911 call), or response services - as in they won't be able to send an officer to the reporting location? I doubt you'd get very far with this bunch of bureacrats by asking for an appropriate reduction in property taxes because of the reduced level of services they are providing.
A ninety eight year old man from Maine (aka a Maineiac) was sitting on his front porch early one spring morning when a man walked up to him and asked, Are you Mr. Lawrence Pinkum?
Aayah, Im him, came back a rather slow reply.
Im afraid I have some very bad news for you, Mr. Pinkum. I have just surveyed your property and you dont live in the state of Maine. In fact, you live in New Hampshire.
The surveyor was sure this would upset the old gent and was quite surprised when the senior Maineiac replied, Thank God for that. I dont think I could stand another Maine winter.
No, they cannot "contract away" their obligations. For example, the provision of 911 services is a federal mandate.
The real issue is that the county didn't want us to build there but had no legal basis to deny the house numbers. If the local voters had not had the foresight to deny the county commission zoning authority, they would simply had zoned this land as non-residential and we not be allowed to build on our property.
What's an illegal subdivision?
"The county officials do not understand their position function."
It's all about zoning. This states constitution does not give power to zone to the county commission. The county commission wants that power and were using the issuance of house numbers as a means of defacto zoning. If they didn't want you to build in an area, then they would simply refuse the house number. An ammendment to the constitution to give zoning power to this county's commission was soundly defeated a couple of years ago.
"In a perfect world, one would simply walk in to the proper office and say, "No house number? No property tax.""
When they said 'they couldn't locate the property" we asked if that meant they wouldn't know were to send the tax notice. They admitted that they would figure that out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.