[VadeRetro]

You introduced ICR's accelerated-decay-rate theory to explain the lack of C14 in coal. That is falsified by evidence of which ICR is aware, and no, dendrochronology is no more a house of cards than common descent, or non-flood geology, or old-universe astronomy.

I'm going out to eat. Just leave your next bit of lawyering obfuscatory blather here and I'll rebut when I get to it.

[DannyTN]

"You introduced ICR's accelerated-decay-rate theory to explain the lack of C14 in coal."

Wrong again! At least not in this thread. I reviewed every post I made in this thread, I've kept the discussion to fossils and stayed away from rate decay arguments.

You can't refute that ICR is right that there is too much unaccounted for C-14 in those fossils. So instead, you pick out some of ICR's work that at present they call nothing more than an investigation and ongoing work, and try to present it as a false and unproven claim to discredit ICR. Now that's intellectual dishonesty.