Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Wins Telecommunications Case against Mexico in WTO
The Office of the United States Trade Representative ^ | 12. March 2004 | press release

Posted on 03/13/2004 7:26:20 AM PST by 1rudeboy

Decision Hands American Families Real Savings:
Industry Estimates Consumers Overcharged More than $1 Billion since 2000

WASHINGTON - U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick announced today that a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel has agreed with the United States that Mexico’s current regime for international telecommunications violates Mexico’s WTO obligations. Mexico’s international telecommunications rules require U.S. carriers to connect with Mexican telecommunications providers in order to complete calls from the United States to Mexico (known as “interconnection”) and grants Mexico’s dominant carrier, Telmex, the exclusive authority to negotiate the rate for connecting calls into Mexico.

About 80% of all cross-border calls between the United States and Mexico originate in the United States, where price competition between U.S. carriers has led to much lower rates for consumers. Given the high volume of calls from the United States to Mexico (second only to calls to Canada), U.S. carriers have estimated that Mexico’s artificially high interconnection charges have resulted in excess payments by U.S. companies and consumers of well over $1 billion since 2000.

“Mexico has provided a single, dominant company with a government mandate to set excessive rates for international calls to Mexico,” Zoellick said. “Today’s decision is an important victory for American consumers and for the telecommunications industry, and provides an excellent example of how WTO disciplines can provide concrete benefits to American consumers and businesses. The successful implementation of this decision will lead to lower costs for American and Mexican families with family and friends across the border and eliminate unnecessary costs for businesses and telecommunications providers.”

The WTO panel sided with the United States on most of the major claims in this dispute. Specifically, the panel found that:

(1) Mexico breached its commitment to ensure that U.S. carriers can connect their international calls to Mexico’s major supplier, Telmex, at cost-based rates.

(2) Mexico breached its obligation to maintain appropriate measures to prevent its dominant carrier from engaging in anti-competitive practices, by granting Telmex the exclusive authority to negotiate the rate that all Mexican carriers charge U.S. companies to complete calls originating in the United States.

(3) Mexico breached its obligations under the WTO Services Agreement, the GATS, by failing to ensure that U.S. carriers operating within Mexico can lease lines from Mexican carriers (and thereby provide services on a resale basis). The panel concluded, however, that Mexico may prohibit U.S. carriers from using leased lines in Mexico to complete calls originating in the United States.

Background

In order to place a telephone call from the United States into another country, U.S. carriers must generally connect into that country’s telecommunications network. This is commonly done by either interconnecting with a foreign carrier and then paying the carrier for its assistance in completing the call, or by leasing a telephone line in the other country and routing calls over that leased line. Mexico prohibited U.S. carriers from leasing lines to bring calls directly into the domestic network and granted Telmex the exclusive authority to negotiate interconnection rates for cross-border traffic on behalf of all Mexican carriers. The elimination of all competition within Mexico for international interconnection resulted in rates significantly above cost and significantly above the rates charged in countries with a competitive telecommunications market.

The United States has had concerns regarding Mexico’s implementation of its telecommunications commitments for several years. The United States held formal WTO consultations with Mexico in October 2000, and again in January 2001. These consultations were able to achieve significant progress with respect to Mexico’s domestic telecom market including a reduction in domestic interconnection rates and measures to regulate Telmex as a dominant carrier. Mexico, however, failed to address U.S. concerns with Mexico’s anti-competitive International Long Distance Rules. As a result, the United States requested a WTO panel in February 2002 to address the outstanding international long-distance issues, including the above cost interconnection rate that Telmex charges U.S. carriers. The panel was established on April 17, 2002.

Under WTO rules, both Mexico and the United States have the opportunity to appeal today's report. If the decision is not appealed, it will be adopted by the WTO, with the recommendation that Mexico comply with the decision. If Mexico fails to comply with the decision, the United States will be allowed to take retaliatory measures.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nafta; thebusheconomy; trade; wto; zoellick
What gives? We all know that the WTO never rules in favor of the United States. [chortle]
1 posted on 03/13/2004 7:26:20 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
When will the cries of "racism" start?
2 posted on 03/13/2004 7:41:31 AM PST by MonroeDNA (Soros is the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"If Mexico fails to comply with the decision, the United States will be allowed to take retaliatory measures."

Yes, we will retaliate by allowing everyone in Mexico to move to the US therby denying Mexico of the need for international communications.

3 posted on 03/13/2004 7:45:45 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I would estimate that most of the calls to Mexico are placed by illegal aliens and Mexican Americans. Mexico is just following our own practices by screwing their own people with artificially high rates.
4 posted on 03/13/2004 7:48:34 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
ROTFLMAO!!
5 posted on 03/13/2004 7:55:10 AM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I truly don't know. But it only took about 15 minutes for someone to bring-up immigration.
6 posted on 03/13/2004 8:05:58 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Mexico is just following our own practices by screwing their own people with artificially high rates.

...and then, there's the Official Corruption Factor in Mexico...with everyone's hand out for cash/graft.

7 posted on 03/13/2004 8:44:17 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
A QUESTION FOR ALL:
Will we still be the Country of Choice and still be our great America if we continue to make the changes forced on us by the people from other countries that came to live in America because it is the Country of Choice?
8 posted on 03/13/2004 9:04:47 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Good question. Maybe it deserves its own thread?
9 posted on 03/13/2004 9:06:48 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Go for it.
10 posted on 03/13/2004 9:40:20 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
...and then, there's the Official Corruption Factor in Mexico...with everyone's hand out for cash/graft.

The words "Mexico" and "corruption" are synonymous.

11 posted on 03/13/2004 9:49:02 AM PST by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson