Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Colossus of Sacramento
The Weekly Standard ^ | March 22, 2004 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 03/13/2004 1:18:14 PM PST by RWR8189

Schwarzenegger takes care of business.

Sacramento CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR Arnold Schwarzenegger's political clout continues to grow. Having won landslide victories this month on two referendums, he is now whipsawing Democrats on his latest agenda item, reforming the state's out-of-control worker's compensation system. Allies of the Republican governor were on the steps of the California capitol last week, signing petitions to get a referendum to overhaul worker's comp on the ballot in November. Inside the capitol, Schwarzenegger was negotiating with Democrats to get a tough reform measure through the legislature.

With his dual strategy, the new governor has given Democrats an unenviable choice: Either retreat on worker's comp, now widely viewed as a job-killer in California, and agree to a compromise acceptable to the governor and most Republicans in the legislature, or face Schwarzenegger in a referendum this fall that could approve even more sweeping reform. Not surprisingly, Democrats are inclined to seek a compromise and avoid another referendum battle with the governor.

Just four months in office, Schwarzenegger is on offense. Republican legislators are in awe of him. When he drops by their meetings, they stand up as if royalty has entered the room. A Republican legislator running in the primary for a U.S. House seat aired a TV ad that showed a picture on his desk--not of his wife and kids, but of his friend Arnold.

Democrats fear dealing with him, but they fear even more what might happen if they don't deal with him. California voters have responded enthusiastically to Schwarzenegger's call for bipartisan solutions to their state's fiscal and economic problems. Given Schwarzenegger's popularity, Democrats don't feel safe obstructing his agenda. But they know if they cooperate, the bipartisan agreements will be mostly on his terms. Democrats are on defense.

When Schwarzenegger came to office last November after winning an impressive victory in the special recall election, it was assumed that governing with an overwhelmingly Democratic legislature would be difficult. It's been easy. And now, after the success of Schwarzenegger's two propositions on the March 2 ballot, his position is stronger than ever. One proposition--to sell $15 billion in bonds to avert a tax hike--attracted less than 40 percent support in polls several weeks before the vote. But Schwarzenegger campaigned hard for it, with a whirlwind of personal appearances and TV ads. The proposition won with 63 percent. The second proposition (mandating a balanced budget) got 71 percent.

More victories seem likely. His negotiations with Indian casinos should produce more revenue soon. When Schwarzenegger picked Donna Arduin as his finance director, Republicans worried she might not be confirmed by the legislature. After all, she is known, from her work with other Republican governors, for being exceptionally skilled at slashing spending. In fact, the new budget Schwarzenegger unveiled in January proposed $11.5 billion in cuts and no tax increase. Nonetheless, Arduin's nomination was approved 5-0 by a Senate committee last week. And she was praised by the legislature's leading Democrat and foremost liberal, John Burton.

Democrats, Burton especially, would love to force Schwarzenegger to swallow a tax increase to get a budget passed. The governor has said, "A tax increase would be the final nail in California's financial coffin." If he yields, Republicans believe he would be seen by voters as no better than the pols here. "He'd become one of us," says Senate Republican leader Jim Brulte. He probably won't have to buckle. The new Democratic assembly leader, Fabian Núñez, is already talking about a budget with no new taxes. And since no Republican legislator would dare back a tax boost Schwarzenegger opposes, Democrats wouldn't get the two-thirds majority required to raise taxes anyway.

Before the budget is resolved, Schwarzenegger may reach a deal with Democrats on worker's comp. In recent years with Democrats in total control in Sacramento, premiums paid by businesses have tripled, further adding to the state's reputation as hostile to business. Schwarzenegger wants to slash premiums--California's are the highest in the nation--as part of his "Sell California" strategy to attract jobs and businesses to the state.

It's on worker's comp that Schwarzenegger's political prowess comes heavily into play. Democrats are bound to dislike any reform package the governor favors. But the alternative is a Republican-written proposition that would be all the more devastating to the current system. Absent agreement on worker's comp legislation, "there's a point in time when we decide we've got to go to the ballot," says Arduin. And Schwarzenegger has demonstrated he knows how to win a referendum.

Democrats will have enough trouble combating a separate proposition that's already made it onto the November ballot. It would repeal the law passed last year that requires businesses with 50 employees or more to provide health insurance to employees. So far, Schwarzenegger hasn't taken a position, and Democrats don't want to goad him into one. They're fearful that if he endorses the proposition, the health insurance mandate is doomed. They have every reason to feel that way.

Fred Barnes is executive editor of The Weekly Standard.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab2600; arnold; fredbarnes; schwarzenegger; weeklystandard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: SierraWasp
Mr. Laird helped to drop kick Santa Cruz county into its current communist state.

Now he's gone after you all. This bill is pure Agenda 21.

BILL NUMBER: AB 2600
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Laird


This bill would establish the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, to
undertake various activities related to the Sierra Nevada Region, as defined, and would prescribe the management, powers, and duties of the conservancy. The bill would create the Sierra Nevada Conservancy Fund in the State Treasury. Moneys in the fund would be available, upon appropriation, for the purposes of the conservancy.

There is in the Resources Agency the Sierra Nevada
Conservancy, which is created as a state agency for all of the
following purposes:
(a) To protect and enhance natural diversity; natural resources; open space; working landscapes, including forests, woodlands, and agricultural and range lands; riparian areas; watersheds; wildlifehabitat; recreational opportunities; interpretive facilities; public
access; and the unique cultural, artistic, and historic resources, within the Sierra Nevada Region.
(b) To assist local economies by increasing tourism and
recreation, and by preserving resource economies.
(c) To protect and improve water quality.
(d) To support development and implementation of collaborative and cooperative resource conservation planning efforts.
(e) To support the development and dissemination of educational information on the region's resources.
(f) To support the development and dissemination of technical
information and expertise.
(g) To assist in program development and implementation.
(h) To facilitate collaboration between the state and other public agencies, local residents and groups, and organizations throughout the state, that are dependent on the resources of the region, in seeking and developing solutions to the resource conservation challenges facing the region.
(i) To work in cooperation with federal, state, and local
governments, and nonprofit organizations, as well as to cooperate in regional efforts with local and state organizations in Nevada, in designing and implementing projects to carry out the purposes of this division.
21 posted on 03/13/2004 10:02:42 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
The stupid CA Farm Bureau Federation is supportin Arnold while he's stabbin 'em in the back with this CONSERVANCY CRAPPOLA!!!

Yep, Go Grange.

22 posted on 03/13/2004 10:06:13 PM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
When the statists, like Laird say they are out to preserve farmland, then katie bar the door.

Mr. Laird helped put Coast Dairies out of business. The brought the fish and game department in who tagged the farm for not fencing off its streams from the cattle. The farmer couldn't afford to build all the new fencing, so sold his beautiful coastal farm to the county of santa cruz for a song.

The county gave it to the state to manage, its greenbelted out of the tax base, but the state wants to give it back.

So a beautiful productive tax roll contributing long time family farm is a wasteland of weeds.
23 posted on 03/13/2004 10:07:34 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; tubebender; wirestripper; forester
Thank you! Currently I feel just like John the Baptist (A voice crying in the wilderness)!!!

Go ahead hedgetrimmer... Post the rest of the UGLY SUCKER, including the Prop 50 bond money that will be used to muscle property owners into submission and take untold amounts of properties off the local government property tax rolls for some imagined worthless purpose as a playground for metro-sexual pissants!!!

I'm sorry, I'm just NOT gonna sit still for this even if it means I bore everyone to death and git shunned or pitched offa FR... I'm just NOT, because it's DEAD WRONG!!!

How do you like my pings to all you "er" dudes??? See? I love productive people... Not the insatiable activists!!!

24 posted on 03/13/2004 10:14:32 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm in contempt of contemptuous liberal courts! We cannot have a Stable Society with their Rule!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
You might want to contact the folks at http://www.freedom21santacruz.net. If you haven't seen their website before, it was created as a place for people to learn about agenda 21 and its application in Santa Cruz county and issues pertaining to the Consitution and individual liberty. They host a radio show wednesday nights this might be a good topic for them.

Email is madison@freedom21santacruz.net



25 posted on 03/13/2004 10:21:53 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The public leans right on major issues in California. Its better for the Democrats to compromise than lose at the ballot box.
26 posted on 03/13/2004 10:24:49 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
PING away...
27 posted on 03/13/2004 10:25:34 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; Carry_Okie
Is Carry Okie aware of this site? His exposure to Agenda 21 in Santa Crux County started him on a whole new life experience. You probably knew that, however.
28 posted on 03/13/2004 10:41:29 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm in contempt of contemptuous liberal courts! We cannot have a Stable Society with their Rule!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
Right you are.
29 posted on 03/13/2004 10:44:43 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson