Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

90-Day Media Strategy by Bush's Aides to Define Kerry
The New York Times ^ | 03/20/04 | JIM RUTENBERG

Posted on 03/19/2004 8:46:41 PM PST by Pokey78

WASHINGTON, March 19 — President Bush's campaign is following an aggressive and precise 90-day media strategy to define Senator John Kerry as indecisive and lacking conviction, with a coordinated blitz of advertisements, speeches and sound bites, senior campaign advisers said this week.

The goal, several campaign aides said, is to first strip Mr. Kerry of the positive image that he carried away from the Democratic primary contests and then to define him issue by issue in their own terms before the summer vacation season. The central thrusts will be national security and taxes, they said.

The aides said the strategy was planned weeks ago in coordination with Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's chief political aide, while Mr. Kerry was battling for his party's nomination.

The aides are following a tight timetable, they said, and they want to have defined Mr. Kerry on their terms between now and early June, when they expect voters to stop paying close attention to politics, at least for a time. In addition, Mr. Kerry will very likely have a much larger war chest with which to fight by then, reducing the effect of the Republican media blitz.

"We just see this as the greatest window of opportunity, not that there won't be others," said Mark McKinnon, Mr. Bush's head media strategist. "It's easiest to define somebody when they're ill-defined, and John Kerry's ill-defined."

The Bush aides pronounce their efforts a success so far, and point to polls showing that Mr. Kerry's ratings are dropping while Mr. Bush's are rising, a huge relief to a campaign that just a couple of weeks ago was criticized even by some Republicans as appearing flat-footed.

"If you look at the average balance of the public polls now, the president's either even, or up one or two points," said Matthew Dowd, the president's chief campaign strategist. "And two weeks ago he was down three or four."

This early drive by the Bush campaign is in marked contrast to the approach of the Kerry organization, whose strategists say they believe the period before June is important but not as crucial as Mr. Bush's team asserts. Calling the Bush campaign's depictions of their candidate "distortions," Mr. Kerry's strategists said the labels would not stick. Mr. Kerry is on vacation in Idaho this week.

"The notion that you have a one-sided definition that takes hold five months before an election is ridiculous," said Bob Shrum, a senior advisor to Mr. Kerry. "I don't think the Bush campaign's caricatures are going to stand up to the reality. Voters are smarter than that."

Mr. Shrum added that the campaign had months in which to define Mr. Kerry and critique Mr. Bush.

The Republicans' move comes unusually early in the campaign season. That helps explain the intensive volley of accusations and counteraccusations between the campaigns that is more common in October than March, and which some members of both parties worry will turn off voters.

But Mr. Bush's aides and strategists said that they had a unique opportunity to strike now, when polls show that most prospective voters do not have a good idea about who Mr. Kerry is — and when Mr. Kerry is neither financially nor strategically equipped to respond in kind.

So far, Mr. Bush's campaign has spent nearly $20 million in advertisements while Mr. Kerry has spent nearly $2 million on commercials since effectively clinching the nomination on March 2. Mr. Bush's advisers emphasized that they will by no means let up after June and still expect an extremely close fight in November. "My guess is this race is going to be roughly tied for a while," Mr. Dowd said.

The Bush campaign's strategy began in earnest last week, with its first confrontational advertisement, asserting that Mr. Kerry would raise taxes significantly and weaken the Patriot Act, "used to arrest terrorists and protect America." It intensified this week with a new, multipronged effort to define Mr. Kerry as "weak on defense" and too unsteady to lead the nation in the war on terror. The campaign did that most precisely with a new advertisement broadcast in West Virginia on Tuesday highlighting Mr. Kerry's vote against the $87 billion package to support military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Vice President Dick Cheney reinforced it at a speech at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library on Wednesday at which he said Mr. Kerry's record was not impressive "for someone who aspires to become commander in chief in this time of testing for our country." Campaign aides and surrogates reinforced the message further in cable news interviews and in conference calls with reporters throughout the week.

The Republican National Committee, which works closely with the campaign on its message, fanned the flames with e-mail messages to reporters and supporters with the heading "John Kerry International Man of Mystery," making fun of his statement that "I've met more leaders" who wanted him to win, and followed with an Internet advertisement on the same theme.

White House and campaign officials were reluctant to disclose details of their plans for the weeks ahead. But several hinted that they would soon attack Mr. Kerry more forcefully on his tax policy, in part by discussing votes in his Senate career supporting taxes that had an effect on the middle class, not just the wealthy.

Bush campaign officials said they were almost certain which themes they would be striking and what sorts of advertisements they would be showing at just about any given moment between now and June, even while acknowledging their plans could change on a dime.

"The goal is right now," said a Bush adviser, "while he's weak, while they're financially struggling, to strip him of all the good that somehow in my opinion erroneously got attached to him."

The advisers contended that that would be relatively easy to do because impressions of him are so ill-formed with many voters. "He peels like an onion," said an associate of Mr. Bush. "People aren't like, `I really believe in this guy and I'm not willing to accept that information.' They accept it very easily. With some candidates there's a hard shell. With him there's a soft skin."

Polls show that many voters say they do not know enough about Mr. Kerry to form very strong opinions. In a New York Times/CBS poll taken March 10 to 14, more than 40 percent of Americans surveyed said they were either undecided or did not know enough about him when asked if they had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mr. Kerry. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Mr. Kerry's campaign acknowledges that he is nowhere near as well-known as is Mr. Bush. But it contended that was more of a problem for Mr. Bush, who they said was trying to turn the election into a referendum on Mr. Kerry rather than one about the president.

"The important thing to remember is that the American people see George Bush as the steward of a bad economy, the leader who led them to war under false pretenses," said Stephanie Cutter, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kerry, striking two themes the campaign believes will be a strong suit against the president.

Kerry campaign officials said they would not be pulled into competing at Mr. Bush's pace, though they would fight back hard, as they have done with surrogates on cable news, e-mail messages to supporters and reporters, Web videos and, to a lesser extent for now, television commercials.

"We're going to fight back when we need to fight back," Mr. Shrum said, adding he did not believe the Bush campaign was as planned out as the Republicans claimed.

Some Republicans said for the last couple of weeks at least, Mr. Kerry's campaign had seemed to be playing more defense than offense.

"The Bush people have stabilized the ballot," said Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster whose firm, Public Opinion Strategies, is releasing a new survey of likely voters showing negative shifts in Mr. Kerry's favorability rating.

But other Republican and campaign officials said they expected Mr. Kerry to come back strongly after his vacation ends next week. And Mr. Dowd said these have been only two good weeks in a long campaign — helped along by missteps from Mr. Kerry that the campaign cannot count on week to week. "Most campaigns start with a plan," he said, "very few end with a plan."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gwb2004; massachusettsliberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2004 8:46:42 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I think Kerry has had 30 years to define himself, Bush et al. are merely highlighting his career.

And I wonder what the big deal is? Lee Atwater had a 150 day game plan for Dukakis. I'm kind of bummed that they only have a 3 monther ready.
BTW, Lee was really surprised that the Willie Horton ads took off. They were scheduled to run one day, on an afternoon, and got wicked traction.
2 posted on 03/19/2004 8:49:14 PM PST by dyed_in_the_wool ("Like a patient etherised upon a table" -- TSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Three months? It should only take slightly less than two to have the Dems running into the hills away from this guy. He's everything he accuses Bush of being-a liar, arrogant, and a big f**k up.
3 posted on 03/19/2004 8:52:48 PM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Peach
Now this irritates me because where the admin is going to spend untold $s doing this, we freepers could have done it for free.
4 posted on 03/19/2004 8:57:07 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

5 posted on 03/19/2004 9:04:59 PM PST by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I think Dick Morris made an excellent point that the first thing they need to do is paint Kerry now as a lying weasel (OK, he said a flip-flopper). Then later on when they expose him as an extreme liberal, any attempt to counter it will just be seen as more lies, er, I mean flip-flops. Kerry saying things like "I voted for it before I voted against it" is incredibly helpful to the Bush strategery.
6 posted on 03/19/2004 9:09:45 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Bumper sticker: "Hey buddy! You like waffles? Vote for
Kerry!
7 posted on 03/19/2004 9:21:08 PM PST by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I've handled political campaigns for years and cannot believe the stories coming out of this campaign. This is an extremely foolish action on the part of "senior Bush aides" to discuss strategy of any kind with the press. It drips insincerity and manipulation. Shut up and let the press be surprised!!!!! Can anyone get this message to someone who matters!
8 posted on 03/19/2004 9:25:23 PM PST by dunblak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wonder if this is disinformation. This administration has been pretty leakproof for the most part. Either that or this is intentional leaking. A "whites of the eyes" thing.
9 posted on 03/19/2004 9:29:54 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I usually ignore Morris, but that was a good column. First, there are going to force Kerry to fix himself in place by arguing that Kerry is a flip-flopper, then once Kerry has fixed himself in place they are going to bomb the hell out of him.
10 posted on 03/19/2004 9:30:55 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Mr. Kerry's campaign acknowledges that he is nowhere near as well-known as is Mr. Bush. But it contended that was more of a problem for Mr. Bush, who they said was trying to turn the election into a referendum on Mr. Kerry rather than one about the president.

Why can't it be both -- because Democrats decided otherwise?

11 posted on 03/19/2004 9:37:59 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I mean flip-flops. Kerry saying things like "I voted for it before I voted against it" is incredibly helpful to the Bush strategery.
Yes, GOP ad on Fox tonight already using this clip as the "punchline" in a new ad. Very effective (well, I'm a bit biased).
12 posted on 03/19/2004 9:43:46 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
And I wonder what the big deal is? Lee Atwater had a 150 day game plan for Dukakis. I'm kind of bummed that they only have a 3 monther ready.

They said this phase was 90 days long. They never said there weren't other phases waiting to follow. Why tip your whole hand?

So9

13 posted on 03/19/2004 9:44:53 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
"I don't think the Bush campaign's caricatures are going to stand up to the reality. Voters are smarter than that."

We're lucky that they dug Shrum back up again for another go-round ... he doesn't realize that it's not the Bush campaign caricatures he has to worry about - it's KERRY's that begun perpetually imploding a little more every day now.

14 posted on 03/19/2004 9:45:37 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dunblak
...an extremely foolish action on the part of "senior Bush aides" to discuss strategy of any kind with the press. It drips insincerity and manipulation

I think it drips of goading the opponent into revealing his hand sooner than he would like to.

Allegedly, Kerry does not have the money to counter this. But if he doesn't counter it, he's hosed... all the bluffing in the article from the D's to the contrary. This is the monent when 40% of the voters say they don't know who this Kerry really is. Well, if Kerry won't tell them, Bush will.

So what's going to happen instead? Does Teresa open the checkbook? George Soros? How about pressure on Hillary to spend some of that HillPac money "for the children cause"?

If they allow the R's to do this, and Kerry dives in the polls, that will greatly impact their ability to raise money for the general election. It could all end right here if Kerry can't or won't act in time. Telegraphing the punch is actually a good way to test what the opponent really has in his arsenal, and to smoke out any "friends" he has hiding in the weeds.


15 posted on 03/19/2004 9:49:01 PM PST by Nick Danger (Give me immortality... or give me death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I notice the Times hasn't done a followup story on Kerry saying "I don't fall down" Thursday, and falling on the ski slopes at least six times Friday. Shocker!
16 posted on 03/19/2004 9:50:12 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
a lot of this article reads like it comes from the lips of Terry McAuliffe as his rendition of how the republicans are doing things.
17 posted on 03/19/2004 9:51:10 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This sounds like a great strategy, I see the Bush Campaign has started to pay attention to our FR posts, :)
P.S. Why are Bush staffers talking about their strategy to the NYtimes?
18 posted on 03/19/2004 10:03:35 PM PST by Betaille ("I voted for the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it." -John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Two words define hanoi john...FLIP FLOPER

Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty at the federal level.

hanoi john soft on crime, soft on terrorist.

19 posted on 03/19/2004 10:08:23 PM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
His anti-death penalty stance should play into this quite well. 70% of Americans support the death penalty.
20 posted on 03/19/2004 10:10:24 PM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson