Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/20/2004 6:03:12 AM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: truthandlife; JohnHuang2; toddst; Dataman; sola gracia; George Frm Br00klyn Park; JenB; Jerry_M; ...
'Passion' ping
2 posted on 03/20/2004 6:03:54 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
"We are fairly certain that born-again Christians are bigoted, not very intelligent, and possibly dangerous."

I'm always amazed by this belief. Many of the greatest thinkers and writers in history have been Christian. I cut intellectual teeth on CS Lewis and Chesterton.


3 posted on 03/20/2004 6:09:51 AM PST by OpusatFR (Liberals lie because the truth would kill them all off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
"Something's happening here, and we ought to find out what it is."

Is a faint light beginning to dawn? Is the Holy spirit at work in this life? Let us pray.

4 posted on 03/20/2004 6:10:27 AM PST by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Margaret is one of the few writers I can read at the mop and pail(standard nickname for the Globe and Mail). She occasionally gets it right.
5 posted on 03/20/2004 6:13:40 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Excellent and very honest article from one of the media-elite who seems to be able to "get it."

Though there is still a little trouble when comparing the following statements:

Mr. Gibson belongs to a tiny sect of backward-looking Catholics who reject Vatican II and think that everybody but themselves is going to hell. As Andy Rooney said on 60 Minutes, the guy's a wacko.

Most media folks are proudly secular types who regard openly religious people as distinctly odd. If you're gay, bi, or transgendered, we embrace you. But if your orientation is toward Jesus, you'd better keep it to yourself. We are fairly certain that born-again Christians are bigoted, not very intelligent, and possibly dangerous.

The first statement seems to be a full embracing of the stereotype she castigates her fellows for in the latter. Still, barring Saul on the road to Damascus, it's not expected that one "gets it" all in one shot. I'm happy to take what we can get.

8 posted on 03/20/2004 6:19:28 AM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife; BibChr; Sabertooth; dsc
It's between certain devout Christians and all the rest of us, especially those of little or no faith

I'm more of a Deist than a Christian, but an honest secular view of Christ's sacrifices and the Christian notion of sin and Christ's sacrifice for the sins of others is still a powerful statement to anyone with a sense of humility.

You won't see this view articulated in the mainstream media. Most media folks are proudly secular types who regard openly religious people as distinctly odd. If you're gay, bi, or transgendered, we embrace you. But if your orientation is toward Jesus, you'd better keep it to yourself. We are fairly certain that born-again Christians are bigoted, not very intelligent, and possibly dangerous. This stereotype is easy to sustain because we've never actually met one.

The honesty is deeply appreciated, Ms. Wente. Most liberal media types aren't nearly so circumspect regarding their own biases towards Christianity. And honesty towards one's own biases is the first step towards bridging differences.

After I talked with Ken Godon, I finally went off to see The Passion. To me, the movie was alternately riveting and revolting, moving and unwatchable. Once or twice it almost touched a chord of rapture in me, the sort of rapture that I vaguely remember feeling as a girl.

I now see where the circumspection comes from, Ms. Wente - you still have a few threads of faith and humanity running through your psyche.

The Passion is on its way to being the biggest hit in movie history. Something's happening here, and we ought to find out what it is.

A smart liberal. I thought they were just about extinct.

11 posted on 03/20/2004 6:23:01 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
It's between certain devout Christians and all the rest of us, especially those of little or no faith. Virtually everyone who mongers opinions in the mainstream media, including me, belongs to the latter category.

Refreshing honesty.

To me, the movie was alternately riveting and revolting, moving and unwatchable. Once or twice it almost touched a chord of rapture in me, the sort of rapture that I vaguely remember feeling as a girl.

Sad and wonderful. God help her.

15 posted on 03/20/2004 6:32:58 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
The churches of the Protestant upper classes have neutered Jesus of his terrifying power. They got rid of all the militancy and gore, which were seen as hopelessly primitive. The suffering of Jesus is Christianity's greatest calling card, and they threw it away.

What a testimony from an outsider (who may be on her way in!).

As my favorite marxist jesuit, Ivan Illich, said, "The gospel is like a joke told to a circle of men. And one man smiles."

20 posted on 03/20/2004 7:04:07 AM PST by TomSmedley ((technical writer looking for work!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; narses; ...

"I'm not a Mel Gibson expert," says Rev. Godon. "But I feel reverence oozing out of the film."

Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list


21 posted on 03/20/2004 7:08:23 AM PST by NYer (Ad Jesum per Mariam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Yep. It spawned hate in me. It made me want to smack every atheist in the head and say "Get it now???????"
25 posted on 03/20/2004 7:15:17 AM PST by My Favorite Headache (Rush 30th Anniversary Tour Tickets On Sale Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Something's happening here, and we ought to find out what it is.

I agree, and pray that you do.
28 posted on 03/20/2004 7:25:37 AM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
The Globe and Mail gets it right from time to time (unlike the sleazy and oh-so-politically-correct NY Times, LA Times, Seattle Times...). Thanks!
35 posted on 03/20/2004 8:04:38 AM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Mr. Gibson belongs to a tiny sect of backward-looking Catholics who reject Vatican II and think that everybody but themselves is going to hell. As Andy Rooney said on 60 Minutes, the guy's a wacko. So isn't it odd that a movie with such wide appeal to Protestants came from him?

I always get a kick out of remarks like this.

The media/critics of the film actually think that Mel Gibson came up with the story of the Passion.

Sure I'm a Protestant and I realize there are some scenes that are Catholic tradition versus actual story from the Gospels.

But that doesn't detract from the fact that most of the movie is straight from the Bible.

I was moved by the imagery, even though I know it didn't actually happen.

For instance, when Christ crushed the head of the serpent that Satan had let loose in the Garden, what a powerful symbolic portrayal of the prophetic pronouncement in Gen. 3:15.

At least this writer is intellectually honest in admitting that she knows there must be more to it, since it is appreciated by so many people.

36 posted on 03/20/2004 8:47:04 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Interesting, if rambling and interspersed with damning with faint praise:

The movie has been condemned by most reviewers.

Flat out not true -- at best the reviews are 50/50 and the more influential ones (including Ebert and Ropert) have approved of it.

Commentators of every faith have deplored it as a religious travesty.

Again, flat out not true -- why is she setting her article up with Jason-Blaire type facts? To make her "big-mindedness" some value?

The real rift over The Passion is not between the Christians and the Jews. It's between certain devout Christians and all the rest of us, especially those of little or no faith. Virtually everyone who mongers opinions in the mainstream media, including me, belongs to the latter

Ahh, the crux of the matter (no pun intended). This is what many of us reading this picked up on -- so we have to ask the question if most of the US is Christian to some degree or other and beter than 80% are religious, then why do we allow the media to not reflect our values?

category.

Mr. Gibson belongs to a tiny sect of backward-looking Catholics who reject Vatican II and think that everybody but themselves is going to hell. As Andy Rooney said on 60 Minutes, the guy's a wacko.

Huh? And double-Huh? Gibson is esssentially the Catholic equivilant of Hassidic (sp?) Jews -- a bit backward looking but no Catholic of any stripe thinks everyone is going to hell but them. Again, why these meaningless and mean assertions?

So isn't it odd that a movie with such wide appeal to Protestants came from him?

No, this is from the same New Testament that all Christians read. The artistic embelishments don't change the basic story, which is agreed upon.

The churches of the Protestant upper classes have neutered Jesus of his terrifying power. They got rid of all the militancy and gore, which were seen as hopelessly primitive. The suffering of Jesus is Christianity's greatest calling card, and they threw it away.

Demeaning and wrong. The reason for the draw is that people see the Liberal Mainstream as devoid of any morals, ethics, or scruples. Christianty and Christ's message of love and sacrifice is a refreshing alternative (although really it is the mainstream and these "do anything I want" types are the alternative).

The Jesus I grew up with was a California hippie with a peace symbol.

Then you never read the bible. This is the 60's JC Super Star Jesus that no Christina recognizies except as a shadow of Him.

He was gentle, meek, and it never occurred to me that he was Jewish. The revolutionary Jesus condemning sinners to hellfire was nowhere to be seen. Even as I marched up the aisle on the day I was confirmed, it had begun to dawn on me that Jesus was just a metaphor. You weren't expected to take any of this hocus-pocus literally. In which case, why bother?

In other words, "you Christians are fools and idiots for really believing a human being could be the embodiment of God."

We are fairly certain that born-again Christians are bigoted, not very intelligent, and possibly dangerous. This stereotype is easy to sustain because we've never actually met one.

No, you know that Christians live based on a Moral Code, there is a Right and a Wrong, and they insist that everyone be held accountable for their actions. This is terrifying to the Liberal Left. How is it possible to have not met one? They represent the bulk of the population of the US?

The Passion is on its way to being the biggest hit in movie history. Something's happening here, and we ought to find out what it is.

ya think? In other words, if this wasn't a success, we could contine to treat the Christians with the distain they so richly deserve. Now, the hands over our eyes and the "nya nya nya" on our lips don't work.

Folks, this is NOT an objective report with refreshing honesty. It is an attempt to innoculate the writer from being like the rest of the idiots in the press and Hollywood in completely missing the fact that they are completely and totally out of touch. The little embellishments I addressed are there so her Liberal friends can nod their head and say "yes yes it doesn't make any sense!"

42 posted on 03/20/2004 10:22:24 AM PST by freedumb2003 (If your cat has babies in the oven you don't call them biscuits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
The Jesus I grew up with was a California hippie with a peace symbol. He was gentle,
meek, and it never occurred to me that he was Jewish.


Even in a conservative Church of Christ environment as a teenager at the end
of the Vietnam War, I had this sort of feeling.
In retrospect, it is shocking that I didn't get more flack for gently expositing
view because:

1.Gentle with the woman at the well doesn't mean there wasn't a justified
@$$-whooping of the exploitative vendors at the temple!

2. "Meek" doesn't really mean being a pacifist wimp...in the Greek sense,
it means "trainable"...as in accepting discipline in the Marine Corps.
(I heard one pastor say that a famous letter from a Greek soldier said that
the strong horse he'd captured from the enemy was "meek"...meaning that this
strong brute of an animal was well-trained and almost instinctively obedient
to the direction of his master.)

3. And suprisingly, my fellow Sunday School class-mates didn't point out
that Jesus or Peter weren't recorded as reading the riot act to the
honorable Roman soldiers that they had encounters with...and no
"give peace a chance, you baby-killer" speeches...

4. As for Jewishness...that was always known...but I'm afraid that a lot
of mainstream Christians don't get a good, detailed view of the Jesus' life
and time in his Jewish world.
49 posted on 03/20/2004 11:31:16 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
The classical Deist position is that God created the universe but then He sat back and let it run its own way. This is sometimes known as the "clockmaker" theory. God made the universe and wound it up, then he let it run on its own.

This position was espoused by the influential circle of Deists who gathered at Great Tew in the 1640s and 1650s. It appeals to some with a "scientific" (I would say pseudo-scientific) bent, who don't like to think of God interfering with natural laws or performing miracles.

The Jews don't believe in the divinity of Christ, but their God is very far from a deist God, because He constantly intervenes in history and rules over it with His providence.

And, yes, Gibson's passion begins with a passage from Isaiah prophesying the Messiah as Suffering Servant.
58 posted on 03/20/2004 12:15:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
The Passion is on its way to being the biggest hit in movie history. Something's happening here, and we ought to find out what it is.

Probably the same thing that made the music of Bach and Beethoven the most universally respected in history,true inspiration.Their art was inspired by the exact same thing that inspires Mel Gibson.

Anti-Christian critics in their day probably mocked them the same way todays critics mock Mel.

64 posted on 03/20/2004 1:16:30 PM PST by armed_in_sydney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
"Christian evangelism -- which accepts the literal truth of the Bible -- is the fastest-growing brand of religion in North America today. "

I think she means 'evangelicalism'. Evangelism is the act of obeying the commission of Jesus to "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations".


This movie sure has many people thinking about Jesus, Who He is, and why He did what He did.

And for His followers ,from what I have seen and heard, it sure has produced remembrance, reflection, repentance, gratitude, worship and more love for Him.
70 posted on 03/20/2004 4:44:09 PM PST by Gal.5:1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Margaret Wente's telling of her introduction to the Passion of The Christ is the most sensitive expression of honesty I've read to date.

Thank you for posting her article.

83 posted on 03/21/2004 11:58:12 AM PST by Robert Drobot (God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson