Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imus vs. Stahl - Inside Politics (Calls her "gutless, lying weasel")
Washington Times ^ | 3/25/04 | Greg Pierce

Posted on 03/25/2004 4:46:18 AM PST by Elkiejg

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Radio personality Don Imus called CBS' Lesley Stahl a "gutless, lying weasel" yesterday for abruptly canceling an interview during which Mr. Imus planned to hammer her about a conflict of interest, the New York Post reports.

"I realize it's a little late in your life, honey, to start gettin' honest, but just say, 'I don't want to appear on the program ... because I heard what he said earlier this morning,' " Mr. Imus railed on his nationally syndicated radio program, which is also broadcast on cable-TV network MSNBC.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bookdeals; cbs; conflictofinterest; foxnews; imus; lesleystahl; mediabias; richardclarke; simonschuster; viacom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Imus can be tiresome ---- but love it when he blasts the LIEberal media.
1 posted on 03/25/2004 4:46:19 AM PST by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Mrs. Stahl had to bow out of the Imus program to shoot extra footage at Grand Central Terminal for upcoming segments of her prime-time magazine "48 Hours Investigates."


So this means she'll be available for a future interview?
2 posted on 03/25/2004 4:55:03 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Ms. Stahl just couldn't find her wig that morning, after an all-night sex romp with Mr Clarke.
3 posted on 03/25/2004 4:56:31 AM PST by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Lesley Stahl: "I'm endlessly fascinated by her (Mizz Rodham) . . . She's so smart. Virtually every time I've seen her perform, she has knocked my socks off."

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

4 posted on 03/25/2004 4:57:34 AM PST by Mike Bates (Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
"60 Minutes" executive producer Don Hewitt said the program should have disclosed the corporate connection, but that leaving it out was merely an "oversight."

This is nothing but BOVINE EXCREMENT!

5 posted on 03/25/2004 4:59:48 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Most democRATs live in a world of fiction and fantasy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
I didn't hear this yesterday but obviously Imus is exactly spot on with his analysis of Mz. Stall's situation. What a scumbag organization CBS is.

Today, Chris Dodd is on, and he thinks Clarke is a "credible" witness. How can anyone have any respect for the dems, they are without a doubt a herd of bogusly credulous, deceptive bunch of power hungry selfish prix. However, what is worse is the media sycophants that just give them a pass on their ridiculous comments and never challenge what they say, it's sickning.

6 posted on 03/25/2004 5:01:21 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Imus is all over the board. Just now he was sucking up to Chris Dodd. Imus is intellectually vapid and, as far as I can see, has never had an origional thought in his career.
7 posted on 03/25/2004 5:03:17 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Everytime Simon & Schuster/Viacom are in the news it sends up Red Flags - Mrs. Clinton is their boughten senator. S&S seem to publish a lot of fairy tales.........
8 posted on 03/25/2004 5:04:42 AM PST by yoe (The worse it is – the better it is!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
IMUS should ask how come no publicity to Gary Aldrich's book or Paterson's "Deleiction of Duty" or Schippers "Sell Out"
9 posted on 03/25/2004 5:18:47 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Imus hosts a three hour leftfest each and every morning which is OK, it's a free country but I would think his pal McCain, the CIC of Abridging Speech, would have by this time filed a complaint with the FCC about it.
10 posted on 03/25/2004 5:21:06 AM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Imus is intellectually vapid and, as far as I can see, has never had an origional thought in his career.

Vapid seems a bit weak, IMHO. Perhaps vacuous?
11 posted on 03/25/2004 5:32:22 AM PST by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Russ
He's sort of a nasty Larry King. Does that make sense?
12 posted on 03/25/2004 5:39:30 AM PST by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Heard Imus this morning saying he was voting for Kerry.
13 posted on 03/25/2004 5:48:42 AM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Imus let Dodd say all the lies and insinuations he wished to. Imus pretends he doesn't know what is going on (he is not "sophisticated" about politics so he says), but he does. Imus is the libs enabler, like so many other personalities on the tv.

After both Alter's and Dodd's shameless performances on Imus this week, I will not ever watch the show ever again -- even during FoxNews commercials. Imus show grow some gonads. He claims he would go after Stahl, but he certainly did not go after Alter or Dodd. Unsurprising, though.

14 posted on 03/25/2004 5:56:55 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
Prior post should read: Imus should grow some gonads.
15 posted on 03/25/2004 5:58:31 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
I can't stand him, but it looks like he got off a good rant before slipping back into leftist mode.
16 posted on 03/25/2004 6:16:20 AM PST by StriperSniper (Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
The networks have always promoted their own tie-in programs and films without ever explaining to the viewers. Leno always invites stars that appear on NBC, Letterman does the same. Clarke needs to be understood for what he is, an anti Islamic terrorism zealot. His vast experience leads him to want government action against the Moslem jihadists, but the politicians/bureaucrats, like Clinton, and Bush are too timid to do anything against the Moslems for the fear of Arab countries labeling us as anti-Moslems. 9/11 outraged all people in the whole world, and enabled Bush to extract revenge without worrying about Arab labels. Clarke wanted Clinton, and Bush to have the same anger and determination before 9/11. If you remember we had the millennia plot, the 93 WTC plot, the embassies plot, the USS Cole plot,... HOW MANY DAMN PLOTS DOES IT TAKE TO GET OUR “see no evil do no evil” POLITICIANS ANGRY!

Richard Clarke is a patriot, and a public servant. Yes, he could have been upset for not getting the lead in the newly formed Home Land Security Department, but I would be upset too. If I was the top terrorist expert for 30 years, and my country gets an urgent need for my experience, and they handed to an ex-governor, and an ex-congressman who have zero experience in terrorism. When experienced people get the top jobs, they create successes, when people with connection get the top jobs, they create impediment to the experts.

17 posted on 03/25/2004 6:27:56 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
"Hey, if it saves one American child's life after I cash in on the maximum exposure window for my book, it was worth it" - Dick "Less" Clarke
18 posted on 03/25/2004 8:41:15 AM PST by an amused spectator (if we had wrapped our tin foil tighter, we could have prevented 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Clarke was given quite a 'blow' by this news.

Stahl ended up with sticky blow-back all over her face.

Man, this sucks.
19 posted on 03/25/2004 11:21:59 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (Guess How We Ended Japanese Kamikaze Attacks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
"60 Minutes" executive producer Don Hewitt said the program should have disclosed the corporate connection, but that leaving it out was merely an "oversight."

That's an obvious lie. The New York Times, which is these libs' favorite newspaper, pointed out that connection a few days before. 60 Minutes had to know that this would be an issue, particularly since CBS has been accused of conflict of interest and checkbook journalism several times over the past year: Paul O'Neill's book, the Michael Jackson interview, their wooing of Jessica Lynch, etc.

20 posted on 03/25/2004 11:33:10 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson