Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arnoldfwilliams
Can't they just redefine poverty to make Bush look bad? How hard is that?
3 posted on 03/27/2004 11:03:04 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
It is easy for them. Look at the graph. If you think like a Dem, you will pick the lowest point on the graph, the early 1970s, and ignore everything beforehand. Then, you scream that poverty is higher than the seventies with the tacit implication that the seventies were bad and that we are doing worse now.
7 posted on 03/27/2004 11:16:20 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

Can't they just redefine poverty to make Bush look bad? How hard is that?

Not very easily, too many competing interests are rooted in how it is calculated. The methodology is pretty much set in rock by court cases fighting over the impacts to government programs, benefits, and economic reports from attempted changes to it.

The federal version of the povertyline/threshold is calculated by the census bureau and published in the Federal Register each year.

Read this for more than you would ever want to know about the poverty measure and its history.

http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/povmeas/papers/orshansky.html

From there they determine howmany folk lay below that threshold for the proverty census.

13 posted on 03/27/2004 12:29:57 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson