Posted on 03/31/2004 10:44:32 AM PST by neverdem
![]() |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
March 31, 2004, 12:51 p.m. Another MoveOn Attack Featuring Richard Clarke
CBS News officials say they are "exploring our options" after the apparent use of audio from the 60 Minutes interview with former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke in a new political commercial by the anti-Bush group MoveOn.org.
"CBS was unaware that MoveOn.org was using CBS News copyrighted material without permission and to advocate a point of view," the company said in a statement. "We are exploring our options."
The MoveOn commercial began playing yesterday on CNN and other news outlets. This is the text of the ad, in its entirety:
NARRATOR: George Bush shamelessly exploited 9/11 in his campaign commercials. Now, Richard Clarke, his former counterterrorism chief, said,
Clarke, reached by telephone Wednesday morning, said he did know about the MoveOn ads. He said he did not have time to discuss the matter.
Whether or not the ad was done with Clarke's consent, MoveOn's action raises new issues about Clarke and partisan politics. Since the launch of his anti-Bush book, Against All Enemies, Clarke has maintained that he has no partisan agenda.
When he was asked about partisanship by the 9/11 Commission, he said, "I've been accused of being a member of John Kerry's campaign team several times this week, including by the White House. So let's just lay that one to bed. I'm not working for the Kerry campaign."
Clarke also said that, "Last time I had to declare my party loyalty, it was to vote in the Virginia primary for president of the United States in the year 2000. And I asked for a Republican ballot."
Clarke voted for John McCain in the Virginia Republican primary.
Sunday, on NBC's Meet the Press, Clarke revealed that he voted for Al Gore in the 2000 general election and he vowed not to get caught up in this year's presidential race.
"I'm not going to endorse John Kerry," he said. "That's what the White House wants me to do. And they want to say I'm part of the Kerry campaign."
The MoveOn ad is technically not part of the Kerry campaign. MoveOn is one of a number of groups The Media Fund, America Coming Together, America Votes that have been formed recently to promote the defeat of President Bush.
The groups have collected millions in contributions from anti-Bush financiers like George Soros and Peter Lewis.
While the groups' leaders claim that they operate independently of and without any coordination with the Kerry campaign, they have run ads that sometimes closely track the arguments made against the president by Kerry and other Democratic leaders.
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||
|
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200403311251.asp
|
That's what I'm thinking. But they're not supposed to co-ordinate, just ask McCain
RWANDA--CLARKE OBSTRUCTED ACTION [Rich Lowry] The Clinton administration's conduct during the Rwandan genocide was one of the more shameful episodes in recent American history, and Dick Clarke was in the middle of it--playing politics, at least according to this passage from Samantha Power's excellent book A Problem from Hell: At the NSC the person who managed Rwanda policy was not [Tony] Lake but Richard Clarke, who oversaw peacekeeping policy and for whom the news from Rwanda only confirmed a deep skepticism about the viability of UN deployments. Clarke believed that another UN failure could doom relations between Congress and the United Nations. He also sought to shield the president from congressional and public criticism. Donald Steinberg managed the Africa portfolio at the NSC and tried to look out for the dying Rwandans, but he was not an experienced in-fighter, and, colleagues say, he never won a single argument with Clarke. Posted at 04:51 PM CLINTON KNEW... [Rich Lowry] ... about the Rwandan genocide, at least according to this story in the Guardian: Papers prove US knew of genocide in Rwanda By Rory Carroll April 1, 2004 US president Bill Clinton's administration knew Rwanda was being engulfed by genocide in April 1994 but buried the information to justify its inaction, classified documents made available for the first time reveal. Senior officials privately used the word genocide within 16 days of the start of the killings, but chose not to do so publicly because the president had already decided not to intervene. Intelligence reports obtained using the US Freedom of Information Act show the cabinet and almost certainly the president knew of a planned "final solution to eliminate all Tutsis" before the slaughter reached its peak. It took Hutu death squads three months from April 6 to murder about 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus and at each stage accurate, detailed reports were reaching Washington policymakers. The documents undermine claims by Mr Clinton and his officials that they did not fully appreciate the scale and speed of the killings. "It's powerful proof that they knew," said Alison des Forges, a Human Rights Watch researcher and authority on the genocide. Posted at 04:22 PM
Oh, not on the agenda? Sorry. *spit*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.