Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another MoveOn Attack ? Featuring Richard Clarke
NRO ^ | March 31, 2004 | Byron York

Posted on 03/31/2004 10:44:32 AM PST by neverdem

E-mail Author

Author Archive

Send to a Friend

<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version


Another MoveOn Attack — Featuring Richard Clarke
The &#8220;nonpartisan&#8221; Clarke finds his voice in the campaign.

CBS News officials say they are "exploring our options" after the apparent use of audio from the 60 Minutes interview with former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke in a new political commercial by the anti-Bush group MoveOn.org.

"CBS was unaware that MoveOn.org was using CBS News copyrighted material without permission and to advocate a point of view," the company said in a statement. "We are exploring our options."

The MoveOn commercial began playing yesterday on CNN and other news outlets. This is the text of the ad, in its entirety:

NARRATOR: George Bush shamelessly exploited 9/11 in his campaign commercials. Now, Richard Clarke, his former counterterrorism chief, said,

CLARKE: I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He ignored terrorism for months when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11.

NARRATOR: George Bush. A failure of leadership. MoveOn PAC is responsible for the content of this advertisement.

Clarke, reached by telephone Wednesday morning, said he did know about the MoveOn ads. He said he did not have time to discuss the matter.

Whether or not the ad was done with Clarke's consent, MoveOn's action raises new issues about Clarke and partisan politics. Since the launch of his anti-Bush book, Against All Enemies, Clarke has maintained that he has no partisan agenda.

When he was asked about partisanship by the 9/11 Commission, he said, "I've been accused of being a member of John Kerry's campaign team several times this week, including by the White House. So let's just lay that one to bed. I'm not working for the Kerry campaign."

Clarke also said that, "Last time I had to declare my party loyalty, it was to vote in the Virginia primary for president of the United States in the year 2000. And I asked for a Republican ballot."

Clarke voted for John McCain in the Virginia Republican primary.

Sunday, on NBC's Meet the Press, Clarke revealed that he voted for Al Gore in the 2000 general election — and he vowed not to get caught up in this year's presidential race.

"I'm not going to endorse John Kerry," he said. "That's what the White House wants me to do. And they want to say I'm part of the Kerry campaign."

The MoveOn ad is technically not part of the Kerry campaign. MoveOn is one of a number of groups — The Media Fund, America Coming Together, America Votes — that have been formed recently to promote the defeat of President Bush.

The groups have collected millions in contributions from anti-Bush financiers like George Soros and Peter Lewis.

While the groups' leaders claim that they operate independently of and without any coordination with the Kerry campaign, they have run ads that sometimes closely track the arguments made against the president by Kerry and other Democratic leaders.


 

     


 

 
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200403311251.asp
     



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: act; americavotes; byronyork; cfr; georgesoros; iraq; johnkerry; moveon; peterlewis; richardclarke; terrorism; themediafund

1 posted on 03/31/2004 10:44:35 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
CBS and Viacom probably love it. It's a plug for Clarkes book.
2 posted on 03/31/2004 10:46:46 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I would love very much to see McAuliffe get caught with his pants down, having hired Clarke with DNC petty cash.

But, of course, even if that IS what happened, there's no way anyone would ever find out about it.
3 posted on 03/31/2004 10:47:49 AM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The subtitle should be:

The “nonpartisan” Clarke finds his voice in the campaign.

The HTML for quotations marks doesn't compute.
4 posted on 03/31/2004 10:49:18 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I love this!

The more partisan Clarke looks, the less credible he is!

The dims as usual is too stupid to play this game.

I want the Bush team to keep the Clarke issue around, keep throwing bombs between the team and Clarke, make the media totally focus on this issue. Suck up all the media oxygen away from kerry. Meanwhile, Bush team must double their aggressive negative ads on kerry, drive Kerry's negatives up skyhigh in the next two weeks.

The Clarke is not going to hurt Bush one bit, but sucking the media oxygen away from Kerry is exactly what the Republicans must do now. Clarke is not on the ballot, Kerry is!
5 posted on 03/31/2004 10:58:27 AM PST by FRgal4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
>>"CBS was unaware that MoveOn.org was using CBS News copyrighted material without permission and to advocate a point of view,"

plausible deniability. CBS and Clarke's bookpublisher
are owned by the same company. CBS would never take any
serious action on this.
6 posted on 03/31/2004 10:58:57 AM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I just saw it; it was the biggest hit piece ever. Clarke looks, fairly or not, extremely partisan now. Moveon may have done Bush a favor.
7 posted on 03/31/2004 11:00:00 AM PST by job (Dinsdale?Dinsdale?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; okie01; Jeff Gannon; mrustow
Hmmm...will Clarke appear in MoveOn agitprop like Joe Wilson? I wonder if they get any remuneration for there time...
8 posted on 03/31/2004 11:07:25 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Thank you MOVEON.ORG, you grow dumber everyday.
9 posted on 03/31/2004 11:07:38 AM PST by Az Joe (Veteran against Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
New title:
CBS considers funneling money into moveon.org to promote Clarke.
10 posted on 03/31/2004 11:15:57 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Remember when NBC wouldn't let Bush use a snippet of his Meet the Press interview in *his* campaign ad?
11 posted on 03/31/2004 11:44:19 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
The left are crucifying Clarke. This is killing Kerry.

I know the Dims are dumber than a post but something is up here. I think they are eating their own so they can bring in the next liberal contestant for the Socialist party nomination.

Hillary to the green room please.
12 posted on 03/31/2004 11:46:11 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Hillary to the green room please.

That's what I'm thinking. But they're not supposed to co-ordinate, just ask McCain

13 posted on 03/31/2004 12:08:46 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem
Hey Moveon, here's some tidbits from Rich Lowry's NRO on your hero Clarke and the Grifting Sink Emperor. Maybe another ad is in order:

RWANDA--CLARKE OBSTRUCTED ACTION [Rich Lowry] The Clinton administration's conduct during the Rwandan genocide was one of the more shameful episodes in recent American history, and Dick Clarke was in the middle of it--playing politics, at least according to this passage from Samantha Power's excellent book A Problem from Hell: “At the NSC the person who managed Rwanda policy was not [Tony] Lake but Richard Clarke, who oversaw peacekeeping policy and for whom the news from Rwanda only confirmed a deep skepticism about the viability of UN deployments. Clarke believed that another UN failure could doom relations between Congress and the United Nations. He also sought to shield the president from congressional and public criticism. Donald Steinberg managed the Africa portfolio at the NSC and tried to look out for the dying Rwandans, but he was not an experienced in-fighter, and, colleagues say, he ‘never won a single argument’ with Clarke.” Posted at 04:51 PM CLINTON KNEW... [Rich Lowry] ... about the Rwandan genocide, at least according to this story in the Guardian: Papers prove US knew of genocide in Rwanda By Rory Carroll April 1, 2004 US president Bill Clinton's administration knew Rwanda was being engulfed by genocide in April 1994 but buried the information to justify its inaction, classified documents made available for the first time reveal. Senior officials privately used the word genocide within 16 days of the start of the killings, but chose not to do so publicly because the president had already decided not to intervene. Intelligence reports obtained using the US Freedom of Information Act show the cabinet and almost certainly the president knew of a planned "final solution to eliminate all Tutsis" before the slaughter reached its peak. It took Hutu death squads three months from April 6 to murder about 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus and at each stage accurate, detailed reports were reaching Washington policymakers. The documents undermine claims by Mr Clinton and his officials that they did not fully appreciate the scale and speed of the killings. "It's powerful proof that they knew," said Alison des Forges, a Human Rights Watch researcher and authority on the genocide. Posted at 04:22 PM

Oh, not on the agenda? Sorry. *spit*

15 posted on 03/31/2004 2:50:52 PM PST by eureka! (The shrillness of the left is a good sign.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson