Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Very Awkward Facts [Clinton/Clarke turn blind eye to Saddam's terrorism connection]
Wall Street Journal | April 2, 2004 | By LAURIE MYLROIE

Posted on 04/02/2004 2:18:22 AM PST by Jim Robinson

Wall Street Journal

Very Awkward Facts

By LAURIE MYLROIE

April 2, 2004

The credibility of Clinton counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has come under withering fire. He has been caught in error after error, omission after omission. I can attest to one error more: a highly revealing error that tells us a great deal about who Richard Clarke really is.

Mr. Clarke singles me out for special criticism in his book, "Against All Enemies." This is not surprising. He believes that Islamic terrorism is the work of a few individual criminals, many of them relatives. I have for years gathered the evidence that shows that terrorism is something more than a mom-and-pop operation: that it is supported by powerful states, very much including Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Mr. Clarke is a man famously intolerant of those who disagree with him. When he cannot win the argument, he cheats. And that is what he has done again in the pages of his book. In order to explain why he opposed the war with Iraq, Mr. Clarke mischaracterizes the arguments of those of us who favored it. The key mischaracterization turns on an important intelligence debate about the identity of the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. This mastermind goes by the name of "Ramzi Yousef." But who was "Ramzi Yousef"?

The evidence suggests that "Ramzi Yousef" had close connections to the Iraqi security services. This evidence has impressed, among others, former CIA chief James Woolsey, and Richard Perle, former head of the Defense Policy Board. Mr. Clarke calls the Yousef-Saddam connection an "utterly discredited" theory, unworthy of serious debate. He likes the phrase so much, he even uses it on the dust jacket of his book. But let's review the facts: • Fact #1: "Ramzi Yousef" entered the U.S. in September 1992 on an Iraqi passport, with stamps showing a journey beginning in Baghdad. This fact is attested by the inspector who admitted Yousef into the U.S. Yet Mr. Clarke contends that Yousef entered the U.S. without a passport.

• Fact #2: The sole remaining fugitive from the 1993 bombing, Abdul Rahman Yasin, is an Iraqi. After the attack, Yasin fled to Iraq. The Iraqi regime rewarded Yasin with a house and monthly stipend. Yet Mr. Clarke claims, incredibly, that the Iraqis jailed Yasin.

• Fact #3: Seven men were indicted in the 1993 attack. Two of the seven, Yousef and Yasin, have Iraqi connections. Yet Mr. Clarke inflates the number of participants to 12, so as to create the impression that the presence of one or two men with Iraqi connections was no big deal.

• Fact #4: The truth is, we don't really know much about the prisoner bearing the name "Ramzi Yousef." Judge Kevin Duffy, who presided over Yousef's two trials, observed at sentencing: "We don't even know what your real name is." Yet Mr. Clarke claims to know what the judge did not: Yousef, he writes, "was born Abdul Basit in Pakistan and grew up in Kuwait where his father worked."

To reach this conclusion, Mr. Clarke has to ignore a forest of awkward facts. In late 1992, according to court documents, Yousef went to the Pakistani consulate in New York with photocopies of the 1984 and 1988 passports of Abdul Basit Karim (those documents have Karim born in Kuwait). Yousef claimed to be Karim, saying he had lost his passport and needed a new one to return home. He received a temporary passport, in the name of Abdul Basit Karim, which he used to flee New York the night of the Trade Center bombing.

Karim was, indeed, a real person, a Pakistani reared in Kuwait. After completing high school in Kuwait, Karim studied for three years in Britain. He graduated from the Swansea Institute in June 1989 and returned home, where he got a job in Kuwait's Planning Ministry. He was there a year later, when Iraq invaded.

Kuwait maintained an alien resident file on Mr. Karim. That file appears to have been altered to create a false identity or "legend" for the terrorist Yousef. Above all, the file contains a fingerprint card bearing Yousef's prints. But Yousef is not Karim -- as Judge Duffy implied -- for many reasons, including the fact that Yousef is 6 feet tall, while Karim was significantly shorter, according to his teachers at Swansea. They do not believe their student is the terrorist mastermind. Indeed, according to Britain's Guardian newspaper, latent fingerprints lifted from material Mr. Karim left at Swansea bear "no resemblance" to Yousef's prints. They are two different people.

The fingerprint card in Mr. Karim's file had to have been switched. The original card bearing his prints was replaced with one bearing Yousef's. The only party that reasonably could have done so is Iraq, while it occupied Kuwait, for the evident purpose of creating a "legend" for one of its terrorist agents.

The debate over Yousef's identity has enormous implications for the 9/11 strikes. U.S. authorities now understand that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed masterminded those attacks. But Mohammed's identity, too, is based on Kuwaiti documents that pre-date Kuwait's liberation from Iraq. According to these documents, Mohammed is Ramzi Yousef's "uncle," and two other al Qaeda masterminds are Yousef's "brothers."

A former deputy chief of Israeli Military Intelligence, Amos Gilboa, has observed that "it's obvious" that these identities are fabricated. A family is not at the core of the most ambitious, most lethal series of terrorist assaults in U.S. history. These are Iraqi agents, given "legends," on the basis of Kuwait's files, while Iraq occupied the country.

When Mr. Clarke reported, six days after the 9/11 strikes, that no evidence existed linking them to Iraq, or Iraq to al Qaeda, he was reiterating the position he and others had taken throughout the Clinton years. They systematically turned a blind eye to such evidence and failed to pursue leads that might result in a conclusion of Iraqi culpability. These officials were charged with defending us "against all enemies." Their own prejudices blinded them to at least one of our enemies and left the nation vulnerable.

Ms. Mylroie, an advisor on Iraq to the 1992 Clinton campaign, is author of "The War Against America" (HarperCollins, 2001).


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonlegacy; iraq; lauriemylroie; nationalsecurity; richardclarke; terrorism; terrorists; waronterror; wot; wtc1993; wtc2001
Received the above via email
1 posted on 04/02/2004 2:18:22 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Do these guys look happy
at the possibility
SHE might someday be their
Commander in Chief?

Help keep "Wonder Vermin"
and her type
out of the White House!!!

Support Free Republic!
 

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD--
Found in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/02/2004 2:19:23 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The more I hear from and about Richard Clarke, the more I'm convinced that he was one of the major causes of 9/11.
3 posted on 04/02/2004 2:22:35 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Read, appreciated and 'bookmarked' FFR
4 posted on 04/02/2004 2:37:59 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If anyone has a real grasp of the truth concerning Iraq, it is Laurie Mylroie.
5 posted on 04/02/2004 2:47:09 AM PST by Use It Or Lose It ( You've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Southflanknorthpawsis
Good article re more of Clarke's lies. BTTT.
6 posted on 04/02/2004 2:55:48 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Clarke being this all knowing and all seeing great one, surely must have know about that UN "OIL for FOOD" program.

Clintons sure knew about it which is apparently why they became Saddam's protectorate, helping out their "fellow travelers", France, Russia, Germany, Syria, Iran etc......
7 posted on 04/02/2004 3:57:13 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
With an idiot like Clarke giving Iraq a pass, its no wonder we got hit on 9/11.
8 posted on 04/02/2004 3:58:41 AM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Mr. Clarke is a man famously intolerant of those who disagree with him. When he cannot win the argument, he cheats. And that is what he has done again in the pages of his book. In order to explain why he opposed the war with Iraq, Mr. Clarke mischaracterizes the arguments of those of us who favored it....When Mr. Clarke reported, six days after the 9/11 strikes, that no evidence existed linking them to Iraq, or Iraq to al Qaeda, he was reiterating the position he and others had taken throughout the Clinton years. They systematically turned a blind eye to such evidence and failed to pursue leads that might result in a conclusion of Iraqi culpability. These officials were charged with defending us "against all enemies." Their own prejudices blinded them to at least one of our enemies and left the nation vulnerable.

Perhaps Mr. Clarke was an early April Fool's joke.

9 posted on 04/02/2004 6:10:51 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
So, two Iraqis were arrested for the '93 WTC bombing, and not only that, an attempt was made to hide the fact that they were Iraqis, and Richard Clarke has to be TOLD to investigate the POSSIBILITY that Iraq may have been complicit in the 2001 obliteration of the same towers.

The country seems to be looking for someone to blame other than the terrorists, it seems we have found at least one guilty of negligence, and that person is Richard Clarke.

10 posted on 04/02/2004 6:24:41 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Fact #2: The sole remaining fugitive from the 1993 bombing, Abdul Rahman Yasin, is an Iraqi. After the attack, Yasin fled to Iraq. The Iraqi regime rewarded Yasin with a house and monthly stipend. Yet Mr. Clarke claims, incredibly, that the Iraqis jailed Yasin.

Incredibly, indeed. Richard Miniter wrote a column evaluating Clarke's book and he, too, pointed out this lie.

I pointed out that evidently Clarke is seeking to polish up the legacy of both Bill Clinton AND Saddam Hussein.

Absolutely incredible. Incredibly evil, that is.

11 posted on 04/02/2004 6:45:59 AM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Oh how the wicked web spun by richard and his backers is tightening. I am begining to think that our President is not only a brilliant commander in chief, but a sly devil who uses patience as a trap that consistently throws the liberals into hysterics.

He is fully grown-up. Mature, wise and knows how to finese more than one battleground.

In his wisdom-he has chosen a fellow team of grown-ups who keep the liberal 'children' in constant flux. Looking smaller and weaker and willing to do anything to escape accountability, the liberals flail about openly under the pressure of President Bush's MO.

Their exposure is a real pleasure to watch because it means Americans can begin to draw sharp contrasts between the two parties.

Clark failed the American people in his duties during the clinton administration, as did clinton and other members in his tribe of un-American kids. This is becoming blatantly clear to all (we have known it forever, it seems) and I wonder if the 9/11 commission has lost its luster for the kennedys, clarks and daschles of this world. He He! Fun to watch nbc, cbs, abc, msnbc, cnbc and others reaching hysterical lows!

They had no vision-just empty rhetoric aimed at driving up popularity polls and appeasing other nations as the expense of our own security.

And P.S.-I love your essay on our opening page! Kudos!

12 posted on 04/02/2004 7:02:14 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Good article re more of Clarke's lies.

Thanks for the ping. Sheeesh. Every day brings out more powerful discrediting of this creep.

I can't wait for Condi to seal the deal. ; *)

13 posted on 04/02/2004 7:59:00 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Laurie rocks!
14 posted on 04/02/2004 8:01:40 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump for Truth
15 posted on 04/02/2004 8:27:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Become a FR Monthly Donor ... Kerry thread archive @ /~normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All
I call for an Investigation of OKC Bombing cover up!
The Third Terrorist ^ | April 2004 | Jayna Davis


Posted on 04/02/2004 11:33:39 AM CST by OPS4

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1110155/posts

This goes nicely with this thread.
16 posted on 04/02/2004 10:34:39 AM PST by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Richard Clarke's book is one colossal Clinton/Gore/Clarke/Albright/Berger/etc. CYA
17 posted on 04/03/2004 10:36:12 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
bttt
18 posted on 04/03/2004 10:38:58 AM PST by No Fool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump to a great post!

Thanks, Jim. The truth will win.
19 posted on 04/03/2004 11:15:02 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson