Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help me rebut my lib uncle's scathing Bush thrashing (how would you respond?)
a flaming neocommunist ^ | 4 11 04 | paulsy

Posted on 04/11/2004 6:26:12 AM PDT by paulsy

My uncle and I have it out regularly and he sent me this note last night. I have ideas on what to say to him but wonder if anyone has ideas on what to write back.

"Paul- The Shrub you so blindly follow is a mean-spirited greedy idiot, and you can't blame mainstream media sources for finally recognizing his lack of clothing. ..."

He was not elected by a majority, he was anointed by a fiercely right wing supreme court majority, most of whom owe their positions to the Shrub man's father and party, undermining the court's legitimacy and that of the Shrub's administration. He has kept the country in fear since 9/11 and sought to campaign as a WAR president, because most war presidents have an easier time passing legislation and getting reelected. He even created a war for that purpose. Remember, it was leaked before the mid-term election, by a White House source, that the sudden irrational run up to the war with Iraq was a matter of "marketing". On the way to Iraq he undid decades' of diplomacy and alienated all of our traditional allies and others whose support we might have expected, except for those he bought or frightened into being "willing". Now, as the biggest gunslinger on the block, we as a country can expect to be the target of every oppressed political animal in the world with weapons and imagination. Oh yeah, we've also lost our position (as if we ever really held or deserved it) as the beacon of hope and freedom for the world. We are undeniably a world bully now, and there is no realistic chance of a meaningful international consensus on any issue while the Shrub Man speaks for us.

You might be thinking of saying "well, Sadam was bad and his demise and capture are good things." (Shrub Man borrows from Martha Stewart, if you didn't notice.) The same thing could have, and I think would have, happened had Shrub Man not announced to the world that he was going to do it with or without international support. Indeed, for many years even Arab countries wanted to get rid of him but we( R's and D's) helped put Sadam in power and protected him.

And just think, so far at least five times as many people have died in the Shrub's dirty little war as died in 9/11. ( Hell, the tobacco industry kills as many people as died in 9/11, EVERY 2 1/2 DAYS). People continue dying every day in the war while Shrub Man hunkers down in the safest and most luxurious places on earth, bellowing "BRING IT ON !".

As for the different views on whether Shrub Man's tax policies add up, I certainly don't know whose math is right. I know the Washington Times is not considered by most people to be objective or main stream; it is decidedly right wing. (Wasn't it started up to punish the Washington Post for exposing Watergate?) I'm no fan of Newsweek either; with very few exceptions it repeats whatever the powers-that-be want it to. However, wasn't Newsweek reporting on the total federal income tax bills while the W. Times only mentions the effect of isolated provisions? If so, both of their math calculations could be correct, but the W Times is comparing apples to oranges. A more meaningful analysis would include the necessary increases in state, local and sales taxes. The fact is Shrub Man has not only made the tax structure more regressive, his wildly irresponsible spending and tax cutting for the rich have greatly increased the tax burden for future generations, and put the economy in peril for the foreseeable future.

Paul, what I think is going on is that the mainstream media and a lot of the country have been giving Shrub Man "WAR president" status since 9/11, along with the benefit of every doubt, since that is what happens when a president is responding to an emergency. Shrub Man, and his shrubbers, took full advantage of this status to advance their political agenda (check out wages, health care, education, the environment, individual rights, or anything else they could sell out) without the normal scrutiny radical changes would normally be subject to, and are running the country into the dirt. Shrub Man killed his golden goose by trying to crassly campaign as a "WAR president", and he's been called on it. He can't fool most of the people all of the time. Now, finally, the normal scrutiny is returning, eyes are opening, the emperor is nekkid, and he is only starting to get the attention he deserves. Open your eyes and get used to it. Julian is right and you seem so be looking for some sand to put your head in.

I think there may be other explanations for your reduced tax bill, if you would be candid about it. I know my tax bill is down, but that's because as a lawyer representing poor and working people who've had their civil rights violated under a regime that favors only rich and corporate interests, my income is down. I give Shrub Man full credit.

I'm yellow dog with a full bladder who's found his Shrub. BRING IT ON!

(Excerpt) Read more at nopage.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 2000election; angryliberals; bushbashers; idiotuncle; iraqwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
fyi I'm not a troll or disrupter, as I've been an active member of Free Republic since January 2001.

-paulsy

"Paul- The Shrub you so blindly follow is a mean-spirited greedy idiot, and you can't blame mainstream media sources for finally recognizing his lack of clothing.

He was not elected by a majority, he was anointed by a fiercely right wing supreme court majority, most of whom owe their positions to the Shrub man's father and party, undermining the court's legitimacy and that of the Shrub's administration. He has kept the country in fear since 9/11 and sought to campaign as a WAR president, because most war presidents have an easier time passing legislation and getting reelected. He even created a war for that purpose. Remember, it was leaked before the mid-term election, by a White House source, that the sudden irrational run up to the war with Iraq was a matter of "marketing". On the way to Iraq he undid decades' of diplomacy and alienated all of our traditional allies and others whose support we might have expected, except for those he bought or frightened into being "willing". Now, as the biggest gunslinger on the block, we as a country can expect to be the target of every oppressed political animal in the world with weapons and imagination. Oh yeah, we've also lost our position (as if we ever really held or deserved it) as the beacon of hope and freedom for the world. We are undeniably a world bully now, and there is no realistic chance of a meaningful international consensus on any issue while the Shrub Man speaks for us.

You might be thinking of saying "well, Sadam was bad and his demise and capture are good things." (Shrub Man borrows from Martha Stewart, if you didn't notice.) The same thing could have, and I think would have, happened had Shrub Man not announced to the world that he was going to do it with or without international support. Indeed, for many years even Arab countries wanted to get rid of him but we( R's and D's) helped put Sadam in power and protected him.

And just think, so far at least five times as many people have died in the Shrub's dirty little war as died in 9/11. ( Hell, the tobacco industry kills as many people as died in 9/11, EVERY 2 1/2 DAYS). People continue dying every day in the war while Shrub Man hunkers down in the safest and most luxurious places on earth, bellowing "BRING IT ON !".

As for the different views on whether Shrub Man's tax policies add up, I certainly don't know whose math is right. I know the Washington Times is not considered by most people to be objective or main stream; it is decidedly right wing. (Wasn't it started up to punish the Washington Post for exposing Watergate?) I'm no fan of Newsweek either; with very few exceptions it repeats whatever the powers-that-be want it to. However, wasn't Newsweek reporting on the total federal income tax bills while the W. Times only mentions the effect of isolated provisions? If so, both of their math calculations could be correct, but the W Times is comparing apples to oranges. A more meaningful analysis would include the necessary increases in state, local and sales taxes. The fact is Shrub Man has not only made the tax structure more regressive, his wildly irresponsible spending and tax cutting for the rich have greatly increased the tax burden for future generations, and put the economy in peril for the foreseeable future.

Paul, what I think is going on is that the mainstream media and a lot of the country have been giving Shrub Man "WAR president" status since 9/11, along with the benefit of every doubt, since that is what happens when a president is responding to an emergency. Shrub Man, and his shrubbers, took full advantage of this status to advance their political agenda (check out wages, health care, education, the environment, individual rights, or anything else they could sell out) without the normal scrutiny radical changes would normally be subject to, and are running the country into the dirt. Shrub Man killed his golden goose by trying to crassly campaign as a "WAR president", and he's been called on it. He can't fool most of the people all of the time. Now, finally, the normal scrutiny is returning, eyes are opening, the emperor is nekkid, and he is only starting to get the attention he deserves. Open your eyes and get used to it. Julian is right and you seem so be looking for some sand to put your head in.

I think there may be other explanations for your reduced tax bill, if you would be candid about it. I know my tax bill is down, but that's because as a lawyer representing poor and working people who've had their civil rights violated under a regime that favors only rich and corporate interests, my income is down. I give Shrub Man full credit.

I'm yellow dog with a full bladder who's found his Shrub. BRING IT ON!"

1 posted on 04/11/2004 6:26:13 AM PDT by paulsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paulsy
You cannot deal with people like this. I ignore them and refuse to engage, simply telling them that they are entitled to their opinion.

I also would request no more e-mail.

2 posted on 04/11/2004 6:28:54 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I tend to agree- someone this belligerent cannot be argued with.

If you so choose to reply anyway, the very best policy is just use the TRUTH. IF he cannot accept truth, you can never win anyway.
3 posted on 04/11/2004 6:30:28 AM PDT by TheBattman (Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
CARVILLE'S YOUR UNCLE????
4 posted on 04/11/2004 6:32:06 AM PDT by cincinnati65 (Rooting for the Panthers since 1995.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
I usually avoid idiots like this; nothing will convince them.
5 posted on 04/11/2004 6:33:31 AM PDT by Rocko (GWB: Release the pdb in pdf, asap and pdq; I am tired of all this bs from the sobs @ the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Have you tried medication? But seriously this is standard with liberals - throw everything including the kitchen sink all at once -- peppered with lots and lots of anger. Any attempt to delve any deeper on any one subject will just be met with a shift in the direction of the argument and more inaccuracies thrown your way. You will end up as the whipping boy for that anger. It is fairly common among Madame DeFarge's who like court tv, "comeuppance" and simple enemies for simple minds.
6 posted on 04/11/2004 6:33:52 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
I would agree with Miss Marple. Some people are better left alone. Just state proudly that you love your President, and that this conversation is over. I would delete his email rantings and forget about them. The Amish use "shunning" quite effectively for years, it works wonders for some. I know when he accuses Bush of having "no clothes" we all want to yell -- "Oh, yeah? Well clintoon's were down around his ankles........." But, it would only serve to make us look bad to do so.
7 posted on 04/11/2004 6:34:22 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
You cannot deal with people like this. I ignore them and refuse to engage, simply telling them that they are entitled to their opinion. I also would request no more e-mail.

Agree. Life is so much better when you rid it of people like this. I do not argue with drunks or Socialists; It wastes your time and annoys the pig..ooops mixed metaphore.

Just use filters to killfile that address. We had a "friend" who put my wife on Moveon's mailing list. That individual is "Unpersoned" and no longer exists.

If an explanation is required, we state that we have the unlimited saturation resources of the Media from which to hear their point of view, and do not need to hear echoes.

8 posted on 04/11/2004 6:34:32 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
I would tell him that your reciept of his e-mail on Easter eve has reminded you of your familial affection for him and that you wish him the Joy of the season in return.

If your religious tradition is other than Christian, a like response is surely available if you reflect upon it.

Debate with people with closed minds -- the true definition of bigot -- is fruitless.

9 posted on 04/11/2004 6:34:49 AM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Personally I think I would just beat the crap out of him at the next family reunion.

Happy Easter.
10 posted on 04/11/2004 6:35:11 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (There is no dignity as impressive, and no independence as important, as living within your means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Hopefully your uncle will not be at Easter dinner this year.

If he IS, try to resist the urge to pelt him with Easter eggs!

Try and take comfort: Everybody's family is screwed up

;-)
11 posted on 04/11/2004 6:35:21 AM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
He was not elected by a majority, he was anointed by a fiercely right wing supreme court majority, most of whom owe their positions to the Shrub man's father and party, undermining the court's legitimacy and that of the Shrub's administration.

Another liberal Bush hater with a CNN politcal education.

Sigh... I bet your uncle thinks our country is a democracy too.

12 posted on 04/11/2004 6:35:46 AM PDT by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Honestly, this guy is hopelessly lost. I wouldn't waste my time pointing out facts to him. He's obviously not interested in facts.
13 posted on 04/11/2004 6:35:50 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I would tell him that you don't blindly follow, he does, and tell him not to e-mail his nonsense to yuo anymore, insult him, he deserves it...his post to you poses as a logical argument but in fact it is simply an in your face insult...to be replied to in kind...
14 posted on 04/11/2004 6:35:54 AM PDT by ronnieb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Trying to change your Uncle would be like asking Teddy "swimmer" Kennedy to stop being a drunken bloated washed up socialist pig.

Just know in your heart that he has a mental disease called liberalism and the best thing to do for him is agree he has a right to his opinion, and we can agree to disagree. Prayer might be in order also as only God can change a man's heart.

15 posted on 04/11/2004 6:37:14 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Now if you had the time and the inclination you could, with facts dispute this email line by line. For instance that Klintoon was elected by an even smaller number of voters.

But I sorta agree with the first two responses, your uncle's opinion will not be changed with facts and he probably doesn't like the good ole saying "if you don't work, you don't eat" either.
16 posted on 04/11/2004 6:37:19 AM PDT by BabsC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
"You cannot deal with people like this. I ignore them and refuse to engage, simply telling them that they are entitled to their opinion. I also would request no more e-mail."

Actually I emailed him first, slamming the newsweek tax article. He's said some things though that can be rebutted. He's an attorney, and even if he "appears" to be beyond reach, he actually takes what I say to him and it makes a difference even if he doesn't admit it. He's softened up a bit in recent years. We go to his place in East Texas and he and I will stay up late into the night talking about this stuff. I'd like to win him over to some degree because he's a pretty vocal advocate on the left (as I used to be).

17 posted on 04/11/2004 6:37:29 AM PDT by paulsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
Certified Florida Election Results
Gore 2,912,253 Bush 2,912,790
Difference Bush by 537
18 posted on 04/11/2004 6:37:39 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
So, the U.S. never really deserved to be considered a beacon of freedom? I guess the millions who left their families and everything familiar to start a new life ventured here under false pretenses. What dupes!
19 posted on 04/11/2004 6:38:15 AM PDT by liberty03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
ah...well, I'd tell him, for sure, that there is no blind following going on...unless it is his...
20 posted on 04/11/2004 6:39:05 AM PDT by ronnieb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson