Skip to comments.
Publicizing Moussaoui Arrest Could Have Halted September 11 Hijackers
Wash. Post / Houston Chronicle ^
| April 17, 2004
| Dan Eggen
Posted on 04/17/2004 6:26:54 AM PDT by John W
Edited on 04/17/2004 10:16:54 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator.
[history]
WASHINGTON -- The commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks has concluded that the hijackers probably would have postponed their strike if the U.S. government had announced the arrest of suspected terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui in August 2001 or had publicized fears that he intended to hijack jetliners.
A report on the case released this week noted that "publicity about the threat" posed by Moussaoui "might have disrupted the plot." Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, said the conclusion is based in part on extensive psychological profiles of the Sept. 11 hijackers, who were "very careful and very jumpy."
"Everything had to go right for them," Kean said. "Had they felt that one of them had been discovered, there is evidence it would have been delayed."
Such a delay could have given the FBI, the CIA, and British and French intelligence services more time to discover Moussaoui's ties to al-Qaida and the terrorist cell in Germany that planned the attack. The FBI also might have had more time to track down two hijackers who had entered the country but were not located before the attacks.
Full story ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; 911hindsight; moussaoui
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
04/17/2004 6:26:54 AM PDT
by
John W
To: John W
To quote Judge Judy: "Shoulda, woulda, coulda"
Hind-sight is always 20/20.
The significant point out of the 9-11 Commission is: al-Qaeda declared war on the US in 1996. We didn't declare war on them until 2001.
al-Qaeda/foreign terrorists were not considered a viable, significant threat to the homeland until 2001. We were not presumptive and we got hit badly. Saddam Hussein did get taken out presumtively, and the liberals are whining and gnashing teeth.
2
posted on
04/17/2004 6:34:24 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: John W
It may have POSTPONED the attack, but there is no evidence that it would have done anything about the core problem. (Saudi oil money fueling worldwide hatred and murder).
3
posted on
04/17/2004 6:34:28 AM PDT
by
tkathy
(nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
To: John W
=====had publicized fears that he intended to hijack jetliners. ===
If it had been made public that al Qaeda guys had been learning how to fly planes without learining to land them we might have one trade tower left.....maybe.
Those aircraft carry lots of passengers. But, if they were filled with passionate liberals nothing else would have happened.
To: John W
They think that we should have publicized clues found or arrests made in a counterterrorism investigation.
These clowns are hopeless.
5
posted on
04/17/2004 6:43:36 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: John W
This is a total cop-out and attempt of the "bipartisan" commission to shifting the blame of 9/11 on the current administration.
Fact: Had Clinton taken Osama in 1996 that would have thwarted the attacks.
Fact: Had Jamie Gorelick not erected a "wall" information could have been shared - the lack of which was a DIRECT contributing factor.
Fact: Clinton met more with Monica than with his own FBI/CIA staff.
Fact: The Clinton Administration knew of specific plans (ways and means) as early as 1995 but did nothing except bomb an aspirin factory.
Fact: There is a cover up of the real cause of 9/11 - A President that didn't do his job, while at the same time he got a "job".
Nuff said.
-MacsMind.com
6
posted on
04/17/2004 6:48:18 AM PDT
by
macsmind76
("thou shalt not get away with it!")
To: mrsmith
"They think that we should have publicized clues found or arrests made in a counterterrorism investigation." That policy would compromise sources. The terrorist would eventually be able to tell that everything a specific person knew or a specific communication channel transmitted was public.
Theyd also be able to have confidence in which of their plans were not compromised, because they werent make public.
7
posted on
04/17/2004 6:52:30 AM PDT
by
elfman2
To: John W
...extensive psychological profiles of the Sept. 11 hijackers, who were "very careful and very jumpy." I wonder why this skittishness wasn't detected during these Arab Muslim men's in-depth visa interviews at the US Embassy or Consulate in Saudi Arabia?
Oh, that's right. There were no interviews. These guys' visas were rubber-stamped via "Visa Express".
8
posted on
04/17/2004 6:54:19 AM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Islamic Immigration is the West's Suicide)
To: TomGuy
It seems to me that the ringleaders of the 19 hijackers had to have known that Moussoui was arrested at the time.
9
posted on
04/17/2004 6:59:51 AM PDT
by
noexcuses
To: John W
Staff wrote in their report
A maximum U.S. effort to investigate Moussaoui could conceivably have unearthed his connections to the Hamburg cell, though this might have required an extensive effort, with help from foreign governments," investigators wrote in a staff report released this week. "The publicity about the threat also might have disrupted the plot. But this would have been a race against time."
Why make it all so hard?
A quick peek at Moussaoui's computer would have saved thousands of lives.
In short, the cronies of Bill Clinton, who was idolized as the "Great Compartmentalizer," done us in.
10
posted on
04/17/2004 7:04:20 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
To: TomGuy
I wonder what publishing the Gorelick memo in 1998 would have done?
11
posted on
04/17/2004 7:05:58 AM PDT
by
snooker
To: John W
...and if we had just listened to Chamberlain none of this would have happened. Of course, non of it would have happened in German. Or Japanese, maybe. Sigh.
12
posted on
04/17/2004 7:07:29 AM PDT
by
Thom Pain
(Quisling - from Vidkun Quisling (1887-1945), a synonym for "traitor")
To: gortklattu
I believe someone who testified this week or last week debunked the claim that the terrorists only learned how to fly planes and not land them. That was a rumor.
The MOussaoouwiwowee guy actually stole/copied a computer program about flying planes when it was left unattended by one of the pilots who died while flying the now dead Minnesota senator whose name escapes me. The RATS rallied around his casket and blamed Republicans for the crash.
To: noexcuses
It seems to me that the ringleaders of the 19 hijackers had to have known that Moussoui was arrested at the time.Yes.....In the Fall of 2001, we kept hearing that the attackers carried out their plot earlier than they originally intended.
Maybe Moussaoui's capture was one of the reasons the date was moved up.
14
posted on
04/17/2004 7:08:14 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
To: petitfour
===I believe someone who testified this week or last week debunked the claim that the terrorists only learned how to fly planes and not land them. That was a rumor.====
The FBI knew... I KNOW that some agents knew. It's not a rumor.
To: John W
A report on the case released this week noted that "publicity about the threat" posed by Moussaoui "might have disrupted the plot."I think that they knew about the capture of Moussaoui, and moved their attacks to an earlier date. They probably would have preferred to crash their planes at midnight on some real American holiday.
16
posted on
04/17/2004 7:15:12 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
To: macsmind76
Had the "Patriot Act" been in effect, that also might have prevented 9/11. As these hearing go on and on, it is appearing more and more that Ashcroft is definitely the man for the job. He has taken unmerciful beating from the left. They probably owe their lives to the man!
17
posted on
04/17/2004 7:22:50 AM PDT
by
Winfield
To: John W; Fred
On Free Republic , on 9/25/
2001, Fred posted a very good
National Review column about the US's blunders and failures that led to the success of the 911 attacks. I think the author, Ariel Cohen, makes a lot of good points. Cohen wrote this--
Finally, one of the largest failures in counterterrorism intelligence rests on the shoulders of the CIA. In 1995 the guidelines promulgated by then-Director of Central Intelligence John Deutsch, prohibited the engagement of foreign intelligence informants who may have previously been involved in human rights violations.
Question: How much attention has been directed by the 911 Commission toward mistakes made by Deutsch?
18
posted on
04/17/2004 7:30:51 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
To: syriacus
19
posted on
04/17/2004 7:33:26 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Cyberterror experts Clarke + Gorelick kept out ALL terrorists who were disguised as electrons.)
To: John W
If someone had stolen Mohammad Atta's wallet, he might not have been able to board the plane.
If Khalid al-Mihdhar had run out of gas on the ride to Dulles, he wouldn't have crashed into the Pentagon.
If if if if.
This is the best Kean can do????
20
posted on
04/17/2004 7:46:38 AM PDT
by
angkor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson