Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AN open letter to my colleagues in the news business. The silence is getting loud.
Miami Herald ^ | 04/23/04 | Leonard Pitts

Posted on 04/24/2004 9:56:59 PM PDT by Pikamax

AN open letter to my colleagues in the news business. The silence is getting loud.

It's been nearly four months since the scandal broke. Four months since Jack Kelley, star foreign correspondent for USA Today, was found to have lied his way through his professional life for the last 13 years. He lied about where he had been, what he had seen, whom he had talked to, what they had said. He lied so much I'm only half convinced "Jack Kelley' is his real name.

Yet you, my colleagues, have not asked the most important question:

What does this mean for the future of white journalism?

Granted, you've pontificated about our damaged credibility. You've felled forests with your weighty ruminations about what this portends for the future of our profession. But, evidently cowed by political correctness, you've ignored the most vital issues.

Did USA Today advance a moderately capable journalist because he was white? Did some white editor mentor him out of racial solidarity even though Kelley was unqualified? In light of this fiasco, should we re- examine the de facto affirmative action that gives white men preferential treatment in our newsrooms?

Certainly, no one had to beg for these questions to be asked a year ago, when Jayson Blair got his sorry backside in hot water. Blair, as you hardly need to be reminded, was a black reporter who initially came to the New York Times via a slot in an internship program the paper was using to increase newsroom diversity. It turned out that the only diversity Blair represented was that which is to be found between lies and damned lies.

Still, some observers felt the circumstances of his hiring were almost as important as the reason for his firing. Columnist Andrew Sullivan claimed Blair got away with snookering the Times because his editors feared offending a black journalist.

Columnist Richard Cohen told us Blair enjoyed "favoritism based on race.'

Jennifer Harper, a reporter for the conservative Washington Times, wrote that the Blair episode made the New York paper a "case study on the effects of affirmative action in the newsroom.'

A computer search Friday indicates that Sullivan, Cohen and Harper have thus far been silent on the racial dimensions of the Kelley incident. In fairness to those worthies, I'm sure they're warming up their laptops even as we speak.

While we await the results, let me, in the interest of full disclosure, admit that I didn't think up today's column on my own. Rather, it was inspired by remarks Gwen Ifill of PBS made last week at an awards dinner. Truth to tell, though, she only crystallized what I and, I daresay, many other journalists of color have been thinking ever since Kelley's deceptions were uncovered.

Namely, that this is (with apologies to the Four Tops) the same old song. When a white person screws up, it ignites a debate on the screw up. When a black person screws up, it ignites a debate on race.

So, loathe though I am to position myself as a spokesman, I feel confident in saying one thing on behalf of black journalists everywhere: When and if our industry decides to deal with the issues raised by Kelley's transgressions, we stand ready to help. Need someone to handle outreach to journalism programs at HWCUs (historically white colleges and universities)? Want to discuss whether hiring whites requires us to lower our standards? Looking for ideas of how to make whites feel more welcome?

We're standing by. All you have to do is call.

Because doggone it, white journalism has a long, proud history Edward R. Murrow, Mike Royko ... Matt Drudge. We cannot allow one bad apple to sully that.

So I'll be over here waiting for the discussion of these issues to begin. I'm thinking I should pack a lunch.

-- Leonard Pitts is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via e-mail at lpitts@herald.com .


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; bushhaters; election2004; jackkelley; jaysonblair; liberalelites; lyingliars; mediabias; openletters; racecard; usaptooey; usatoday

1 posted on 04/24/2004 9:57:00 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Did USA Today advance a moderately capable journalist because he was white?

Why focus on skin color? Look at liberal political positions.

The left takes care of their own.

2 posted on 04/24/2004 10:02:02 PM PDT by weegee (Maybe Urban Outfitters should sell t-shirts that say "Voting Democrat is for Old Dead People.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
It's a good thing this editorial wasn't written by his brother, Stu.
3 posted on 04/24/2004 10:02:53 PM PDT by weegee (Maybe Urban Outfitters should sell t-shirts that say "Voting Democrat is for Old Dead People.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Namely, that this is (with apologies to the Four Tops) the same old song. When a white person screws up, it ignites a debate on the screw up. When a black person screws up, it ignites a debate on race.

Wrong and wrong. The debate should be on journalistic ethics, something not learned in college classes taught by unabashed liberals who believe that the end justifies the means as long as it advances their goal, unattainable though it may be, of a one-world classless society.

4 posted on 04/24/2004 10:06:41 PM PDT by CedarDave (Asbestos has already made millionaires of lawyers; arsenic may be poised to do the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; weegee
No, but Stu is his middle name.

Blair by all accounts:
- was notoriously underqualified (not a college grad, I think).
- would never have been considered by the NYT if he were white with the same qualifications.
- therefore got where he was ONLY because of his race.
- gave numerous warning signs of being not up to the work when he was at NYT, all of which were ignored.
- was very erratic personally.

Now Kelley may have been erratic (don't know), but he came in qualified without special consideration and apparently did decent work until he fell off the rails and turned into a quintessential con man.

What both cases appear to have in common is lax supervision. What makes USAT different is that Kelley had for a while earned his flexibility and THEN betrayed his superiors and readers. Blair was pitiful from the very beginning.

Leonard (Stu) Pitts has no point to make, and his column is a waste of space.
5 posted on 04/24/2004 10:13:28 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
saved me some typing, I agree totally.
6 posted on 04/24/2004 10:26:03 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"It's been nearly four months since the scandal broke. Four months since Jack Kelley, star foreign correspondent for USA Today, was found to have lied his way through his professional life for the last 13 years. He lied about where he had been, what he had seen, whom he had talked to, what they had said. He lied so much I'm only half convinced "Jack Kelley' is his real name."

A News Correspondent not telling the truth.
I'm shocked, shocked, absolutely shocked!
7 posted on 04/24/2004 10:29:53 PM PDT by Smartass (BUSH & CHENEY 2004 - THE BEST GET BETTER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
When a white person screws up, it ignites a debate on the screw up. When a black person screws up, it ignites a debate on race.

Could have fooled me, Leonard Pitts. I wasn't aware of Jayson Blair's race until you brought it up (though it's relevance to the issue still remains a mystery).

8 posted on 04/24/2004 11:50:02 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Going partly violent to the thing since Nov. 25, 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I'm thinking I should pack a lunch.
Ah, the nuances of language based upon region. In some areas "I've packed my lunch" means you're ready to physically fight.
Watch out when he announces that he does have his lunch packed and is no longer just thinking about packing one.
9 posted on 04/25/2004 12:06:13 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smartass
Good point.

Perhaps there is something in what Mr. Pitts says. Certainly Blair got where he was because of his race, but the big story is that the Left will say what ever it takes to advance "The Movement". If the facts don't quite work out, the left will make up facts.

10 posted on 04/25/2004 4:32:36 AM PDT by Tom D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Agree-IMHO this skin issue overall in our society is designed to distract all of us from the underlying issue of significnt differences in fundamental thoughts, ideas, and beliefs-in short REALITY.
11 posted on 04/25/2004 4:37:56 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Open letter to Mr. Pitts:

Both the Blair and Kelley cases are a black (oops!) eye on journalism and especially their editors. Admonition should be identical in both case.

But, alas, you're right...most analyses of the Blair case dealt with race. From reading your letter I get the impression you can't imagine why race entered into it.

Well, think two words: "affirmative action". Diversity programs, affirmative action, quotas---whatever you want to call them---have led to this perception in racial terms. If both Mr. Blair and Mr. Kelley were operating on a level playing field, with no preference for either, no one would have dared blame Mr. Blairs sins on his skin color.

Your letter is written as though affirmative action didn't exist. Thus it loses its breath about halfway through.
12 posted on 04/25/2004 5:05:58 AM PDT by Timeout (Dems and MediaCrats: Stuck in a 9/10 world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
When a black person screws up, it ignites a debate on race.

Two can google this game. Mr. Pitts. Here's some more of your feeeeeelings.

After acknowledging that rap "has been repeatedly stained with the blood of performers and hangers-on, of which the murders of Tupac Shakur and Christopher 'The Notorious B.I.G'" Mr. Pitts asks, "Given all that, should you and I be troubled that police are spying on these guys?"

He responds to his own question. "Yeah, I think we should" and continues.

"The problem is that police aren't surveilling people they suspect of committing crimes or even people they suspect will commit crimes. Rather, they are surveilling an entire class.

And how convenient that the vast majority of people in that class is young, male and black." [end excerpt]

"Surveilling an entire class," as in racial profiling. As in pulling a person over for speeding, driving while black.

He has a good point about the white press. If only he'd address both sides of igniting debate where the issue is "race," always race.

13 posted on 04/25/2004 7:25:04 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Benedict Arnold was a hero for both sides in the same war, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Every time one of these stories arises, it gives PROOF to why the leftist anchors are "Lying Liars" (they make stories up out of whole cloth with nary a shred of truth).

We see Doofus Franken complain about political ideology and dispute it as "fact" when he disagrees with someone's opinion. The biased left press rooms print fraudulent articles that aren't even researched and still the left denies that there is a leftist tilt in the media?

Show me the conservative voice who is making up stories. Doesn't happen even at "conservative" broadcasters/publishers.

Meanwhile CNN recently got caught using photos of NASA astronauts in coffins and claiming they were US soldiers killed in Iraq. They want the "if it bleeds, it leads" footage.

14 posted on 04/25/2004 9:27:13 AM PDT by weegee (Maybe Urban Outfitters should sell t-shirts that say "Voting Democrat is for Old Dead People.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson