[Clintonfatigued]

Excellent posting. I have been thinking the same thing. There are many parallels between 1992 and 2004. First, the economy is slowly recovering from a recession, but job creation has been mediocre. Second, this Bush faces conservative dissatisfaction over his support for free trade, which is losing credibility. Third, Bush won a popular victory over Iraq but many feel he's mishandled the post-war operations. Fourth, and most important, the lamestream press have become the 'Rat nominee's personal cheerleading squad. I haven't seen media bias this flagrant in years. But look on the bright side: if the 2004 Presidential election is another 1992, then the 2006 off-year elections could easily be another 1994.

[nutmeg]

ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[sauropod]

This is the RET I remember. Thx.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Does that mean this Democratic contender will in the end defeat another Bush?

Only if Ross Perot shows up.

[Gritty]

Kerry isn't nearly as good a liar as clinton is.

But you have to hand it to him,... he works hard at it!