[churchillbuff]

No WMDs. Many dead Americans. But no WMDs.

[CWOJackson]

What's the matter, didn't get your cut of the oil for food money like your French, German and Russian friends.

How sad.

[Allegra]

No WMDs. Many dead Americans. But no WMDs.

How do you know?

[ought-six]

"No WMDs. Many dead Americans. But no WMDs."

Ummm...Saddam Hussein himself was a weapon of mass destruction. However, he did have the more tangible kind, like chemicals and biologicals, and was sure looking into the nuclears: Even the U.N. and the appeaser nations admitted it; they just didn't agree on what to do about it. You are anti-war, but I wonder if you are selective in your bias? Did you loudly and soundly protest and oppose the Clinton misadventure in the Balkans? I wonder.

[sruleoflaw]

No WMD's. Get real man. 41 material breaches of UN resolutions. 3/4 of a gallon of sarin in one shell, enough to kill thousands. 20 tons of chemicals sent to Jordan, most likely from Iraq through Syria.

The liberal balony won't fly here! Ask the 5-6 million Kurds if they enjoy their freedom -- and freedom from Saddam. If you had your way, the WMD man himself, Saddam, would still be operational.