Posted on 05/09/2004 6:04:35 AM PDT by ontos-on
When dumb is deadly Kathleen Parker (back to web version) | Send
May 8, 2004
When President Bush told the world that abuses at Abu Ghraib prison do not reflect American values, he was right. The best American values, in spirit if not always in practice, respect human life, dignity and the rule of law.
But some of what happened at Abu Ghraib, specifically the sexualized humiliations, may reflect American culture, especially in the instance of the naked human pyramid, which is nearly iconographic within the adolescent zeitgeist that spawned our current generation of soldiers.
The images from Abu Ghraib, now irreversibly tattooed on the Arab brain, were every frat-house cliche magnified. The human pyramid, males mooning, masturbation, bags over heads. What we saw, at least in part, was "The Farrelly Brothers Do Baghdad."
How else to explain the giddy photographs of young soldiers mugging for cameras and giving the thumbs-up sign beside humiliated prisoners, naked and masturbating? Another Farrelly movie, "Dumb and Dumber," comes to mind
I don't want to overstate my case by insisting that the culture made 'em do it, but we'd be missing a few dots if we didn't admit that the culture that birthed our young soldiers has dumbed down the definition of human dignity.
The Farrelly Brothers - kings of the gross-out comedy film genre characterized by scatological humor and raunchy sex jokes - are convenient touchstones in the larger discussion about the debasing of American culture. In their side-splitter for the developmentally arrested, "There's Something About Mary," the male star gets his genitals stuck in a zipper. Later when he pleasures himself, he misplaces his "issue," which subsequently becomes hair gel for "Mary."
Don't ask.
Such is what has passed for culture for many of the kids now populating our military. My point: There's not much difference between what those soldiers enacted in Abu Ghraib for digital cameras and 15 seconds of instafame back home and what America's increasingly debased culture embraces as good harmless fun.
Quickly, I want to draw a clear distinction between the photographs of naked prisoners and other reports of physical torture. There's no excuse for either - no justification, no exit from a full hearing and appropriate punishment - but there is a difference.
In a 53-page report about Abu Ghraib completed in February, Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba noted that some abuse of detainees went beyond anything we might construe as mere hazing and probably meets most definitions of torture. One excerpt, for example, reads:
"Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape ... sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick ..."
No, it's not Saddam's plastic shredder, but these examples clearly violate the Geneva Conventions, that tenuous thread to civilization to which we cling during wartime. Heads should roll, publicly and swiftly.
Meanwhile, the other psychological tortures - the dehumanizing images of naked men forced to perform as sex slaves - have provoked the most outrage in the Arab world where men being naked in front of other men is deeply humiliating. Being forced into the posture of a woman is as bad as it gets.
Perhaps most shocking of all the photographs were those showing young female soldiers ridiculing their male captives - behind a stack of bare male bottoms, or pointing at the genitals of a masturbating prisoner. In one account, a young woman gleefully reports that one of the prisoners under her watch has become tumescent. And then, might we presume, giggle, giggle?
How did such depravity come to pass? How could our bright and brave young people come to behave so stupidly? While some claim they were merely following orders, surely those orders didn't include posing for pictures. At the same time they're displaying for their pictorial diaries, the soldiers seem bereft of historical conscience, unburdened by any awareness of larger - and lethal - contexts into which their frat-house scrapbooks might be placed.
To them, it seems, Abu Ghraib was just another photo op, an after-hours party sans grown-ups to inhibit their jaunty trip through a Heronymous Bosch garden of perverse delights. Farrelly, farrelly, farrelly, farrelly life is but a dream.
We can't blame America's culture entirely, but as we're trying to change the hearts and minds of others, we might take a closer look at our own. You can't steep a teabag in sewerage and expect it to taste like Earl Gray.
I'm going to write the Pentagon and suggest instead they feed these prisoners salty food and deny them water. Nobody could withstand that for more than a few days before they become desperate and talk.
The last thing we need is more government in any sphere of our lives. Yet that is the first thing that modern neo-conservatives think about. Old fashioned conservatives, in which group I include myself, know better. Government is the cause, not the cure for our problems.
Those soldiers would not have been doing these atrocities if they were back home doing normal civilian work (except those who were prison guards, of course). The pointless war, started by our government, is the root cause of this problem.
When you fight a war, it is natural for the military to instill hate of the enemy in its soldiers. How else to get them to shoot to kill other soldiers of their age, none of whom has any influence on national policy? That hate exists 24/7 and shows up in the handling of prisoners.
The only way to reduce this horror is to not fight wars randomly, but save the horror for when you really need to, true self defense.
Is the chemical-light liquid really all that bad?
/sarcasm off
Your 'keep government out' is a lttle too late. The government is up to its eyeballs in our education, employment and mores.
BTW, to point to a sexualization problem in our society is not to urge that the government solve it. Perhaps it is you who think that the only effective force in the society is the government. Look at the issues and try to think more deeply than a puddle-jump reaction.
wasn't this "funded by a grant" from the NEA?
Yes, this type of abuse happens in our domestic prison system. Does that make it OK? NOT
We need to stop it from happening everywhere.
Best I've seen, and spot on.
Lynndie and company give a whole new import to Girls Gone Wild, do they not?
Yes and a good conservative wants to fix that. George Bush wants to spread the government into more of our lives (Think: No Child Left Behind)and thus he is no conservative. At least no conservative that I could ever support.
Now don't go calling me a Kerry supporter. He is a big government type just the same. Both will spend wildly, just not on the same things. Neither one is fit to serve. There is no alternative but the Libertarian candidate (who will be decided by May 31.)
After which they head out to t*tt* bars where all sorts of depraved entertainments amuse them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.