To: wagglebee
"" 'Well, I had all the requisite security clearances and, in fact, there is some personal discretion that is allowed when you are in personal relationships' Wilson told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg."
Utter BS.
Maureen Dowd let this little tidbit slip out in one of her columns a few months ago and I was surprised no one picked up on it. I sent an email to Boortz about it hoping he would bring it up on his show but he never did.
I was cleared for Secret in my time in the military and anyone who has been granted a security clearance knows that classified information is given out on a NEED TO KNOW basis only. It doesn't matter how high the clearance of the recipient is. This was a clear compromise of security. There is NO leeway given to persons because of their "relationship". She violated federal law by outing herself.
19 posted on
05/09/2004 3:20:23 PM PDT by
dandi
("No nation ever taxed it's way into prosperity." - R.L.)
To: dandi
classified information is given out on a NEED TO KNOW basis onlyYep.
21 posted on
05/09/2004 3:23:51 PM PDT by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: dandi
So, what are the chances Joe will be called on his bald faced lie?
31 posted on
05/09/2004 3:32:29 PM PDT by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson