The Saddam-9/11 Link Confirmed

FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 5/11/04 | Laurie Mylroie

[Binti Jua]

***I don't think Saddam Hussein was "behind" 9/11, but I do think he was linked to it***

Please, do keep thinking.

[Dr. Frank fan]

Please, do keep thinking.

You're clever and I'm very impressed.

[Michael.SF.]

No, a notation saying that someone had a meeting with a "Hamburg student" isn't enough.

Preacher,

Thanks,

Choir member

[Binti Jua]

The Saddam - 9/11 link was officially confirmed today.

U.S. to Turn Over Saddam to Iraq by July

The United States has pledged to hand over Saddam Hussein and about 100 other former regime prisoners to Iraqi authorities.

[CobaltBlue]

The Saddam - 9/11 link was officially confirmed today.

No, it wasn't.

[BOBTHENAILER]

Beautiful summation. Thanks for the flag EatB

[Tailgunner Joe]

bttt

[BOBTHENAILER]

Beautiful summation. Thanks for the flag EatB

[Binti Jua]

Why else would the U. S. authorities want to hand over Saddam to the Iraqis?

Laurie Mylroie's confirmed link Saddam-9/11 made them do so. Saddam deserves a swift justice from the hands of the people of Iraq for his role in the destruction of Pentagon and WTC.

Thank to Front Page Magazine and Laurie Mylroie with her brilliant investigative skills it now became clearer than ever.

FRegards,
B.J.

[CobaltBlue]

I hope you're being sarcastic. Saddam is being handed over to the Iraqi government for prosecution for violation of Iraqi law.

[KingofQue]

I don't believe he masterminded it. I believe they had a hand in it. How I don't know. Maybe money, maybe forged documents, safe houses, etc. It would seem on the surface, if Atta met al-ani that there is a connection of some kind.
Maybe they were discussing what muslim charity they were going to donate to. Why would alqaeda want to be in contact with Iraqi Intelligence? Why did Saddam turn to Islam when previously he was secular? Saddam miscalculated, he thought the Russians, French, Germans could keep the US off his back. They tried. He bought them. The same thing with the Palestinians, $25,000 for each suicide bomber. If that isn't supporting terror what is?
And forget about the law. Any target is fair game in war. If our military or CIA or any other security service finds out about combatants the can be engaged. Out of uniform, what uniform? They become spies or terrorists and the legal ramifications change completely.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Exactly right!

We are not talking about a court of law when weighting who and what countries pose a danger to us.

His previous actions certainly showed intent... in many areas!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Report Details Saddam's Support for Terrorists Who Killed Americans

The above link is the FreeRepublic discussion thread.

The actual article is :

"Saddam Hussein’s Philanthropy of Terror"

It is a pdf document with substantial footnotes and put together by Dewey Murdock of the Hudson Institute.

[Shepster]

Isn't Edward Jay Epstein a JFK conspiracy kook?

[jmstein7]

BUMP!

[FairOpinion]

Thanks for all the links and article.

That was my thought -- the link between Al Qaeda and Saddam AND 9-11 has been confirmed MANY times, but there is no amount of evidence the liberals and the media can't ignore.

[cgk]

Bumpity-bump!

[Defender2]

PING to this Article!!!!

[nutmeg]

read later

[Qwinn]

Eh. I'm beyond thinking of people with conspiracy theories about JFK as "kooks". There was enough there that legitimately did "smell" to make a conspiracy theory surrounding it plausible enough in my book. I'm still putting my money on Oswald as a lone gunman, but I -don't- see any particular reason to believe there weren't others involved (Ruby shooting Oswald in the manner he did -alone- is sufficient to make that plausible). I'm of the opinion that reasonable people can believe a conspiracy was involved there, without necessarily believing it myself.

Qwinn