LEASH GAL'S SEX PIX

New York Post ^ | 5/13/04 | VINCENT MORRIS and DEBORAH ORIN

[kattracks]

May 13, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - Shocking shots of sexcapades involving Pfc. Lynndie England were among the hundreds of X-rated photos and videos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal shown to lawmakers in a top-secret Capitol conference room yesterday.

"She was having sex with numerous partners. It appeared to be consensual," said a lawmaker who saw the photos.

[Mr. Mojo]

And who wouldn't want to have sex with such a hottie?

[AbnSarge]

"So they would be subject to the same punishment as regular military if/when convicted?"

Yes, they are subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and will be tried by the active chain of command

[evets]

[MississippiMan]

Notice how all the most shocked and disgusted politicians are the very ones who so INSISTED on fully integrating men and women in every aspect of military life.

MM

[af_vet_rr]

Hey, Lynndie...did the psyops guys tell you to pull the train for your unit?

No kidding, I got tired of all the people trying to defend her, saying she was made to pose, it wasn't her fault, etc.

I wonder if this will shut her dad the hell up. He came out attacking Bush over this, saying Bush shouldn't criticize her, because Bush was never in a warzone. Nice way to divert attention away from the apparently poor upbringing he gave his daughter.

I'm sure he's real proud of his daughter now.

[FeliciaCat]

Thank you for the info.

Are you in the military? If so, is this shocking to you?

[RedBloodedAmerican]

So wouldn't these pics be property of the United States military? It could have been classified; what was Hack doing with it?

The guy is a modern day John Kerry.

[television is just wrong]

No offense taken. A lot of people are ill suited for military service. Some have it some don't.

[WOSG]

To be precise, the earlier poster's point was about the feminist agenda, not the intentions of women joining the forces.

Women who want to serve out of patriotism are great, but whether a particular woman can and in what capacity is a decision that should be grounded on best national security interests, and not based on feminist ideology, which is contrary to biological and civilizational reality.

There is something that should be said clearly: No person has a 'right' to serve the military. Those that are most helpful to defending our nation can and should be given the opportunity to serve, but there is no 'right' to service.
If you are too weak, hard of seeing/hearing, etc. you cant serve.

The feminist agenda put their goals of total sexual equality ahead of freedom, ahead of prosperity, ahead of family cohesion, ahead of justice, ahead of indeed national security. That agenda has forced a number of changes in our society that have had harmful effects in many areas.
No doubt, the introduction of women to more and more military roles has been a double edged sword, and the negative impacts of this has been ignored by the feminists for a simple reason: They dont care about our national security. Case in point - former congress-whatever Pat Shroeder.

[Penner]

"It was pretty disgusting, not what you'd expect from Americans," said Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.). "There was lots of sexual stuff - not of the Iraqis, but of our troops."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who also characterized the photos as "disgusting," agreed, noting, "It's hard to believe that this actually is taking place in a military facility."

"It was significantly worse than I had anticipated," said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore). "Take the worst case and multiply it over several times."

"I don't know how these people got into our Army," said Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colo.), who reported seeing "several pictures of Iraqi women who were disrobed or putting their shirts up."

LMAO. I have many similar tales about Army life in a "diverse" unit that I could impart to these rubes if they asked.

[twigs]

Apparently some photos involve an entirely different unit. I forget which one. That is giving some people their fodder for saying it goes all the way up the chain of command.

[FeliciaCat]

Is it just me or does she look..how should I say this.."mentally challenged" in these photos?? I realize these are probably not the most flattering, but there is something about her eyes/face structure that reminds me of a down syndrome person..

[television is just wrong]

She needs to be woke up. What planet is she on?
Feinstein and the rest of them are out of touch, send them to Iraq to fight the war.Maybe they can do better?

[AbnSarge]

Army National Guard, with active duty time in the Marine Corps.

Shocked? yes, with a large measure of disgust thrown in. We work very hard to prove to the active army that we are disciplined and can do the job, and a bunch of yahoos like this negates what the hundreds of thousands of good reserve-component soldiers are doing.

[WOSG]

No doubt it *was* classified. hasnt stopped the press before, though, has it?

[mafree]

Leave that to the professionals, just wait for Michael Moore's next movie.

If it depicts him having sex it will have to be billed as a horror flick.

[FeliciaCat]

Thank you for your service!

I just cant understand HOW this could go on in a military installation..where was the person(s) in charge???

[gatorbait]

I'm not going to tell a combat veteran that what he saw with his own eyes is wrong

He led a group of women into the DMZ in Korea in Combat? Untold stories ,indeed .

[Capt. Tom]

I think all of you made some good responses to me.

No doubt women and gays love this country as much as the men, and many would give their life for it.

The problem is mixing them in with combat soldiers just doesn't work. And the traitorous anti- Americans, who foisted this on us knew that.- Tom

[af_vet_rr]

I just cant understand HOW this could go on in a military installation..where was the person(s) in charge???

This thread may help you understand.

Thanks to Rep. Heather Wilson, New Mexico Republican and a former military officer, we now know the sequence of events that led to the American military police abuse and torture of Iraqi prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison. A military investigation in late summer 2003 of the 800th Military Police Brigade under Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski by Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller found a breakdown in discipline at the prison. When told that her troops were not even saluting, the general refused to order them to begin doing so.

Central Command, concerned about the breakdown but apparently worried about disciplining one of the highest ranking female Army officers in Iraq, devised a compromise bureaucratic solution to hand control of the critical central interrogation prison at Abu Ghraib to the military intelligence unit questioning the prisoners. The critical order was issued October 12, 2003, and was confirmed by Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez in November. This put the interrogators in charge and was the precipitating event for what investigating Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba called sadistic criminal abuses, the first one of which apparently took place on October 17, 2003.

Putting aside the fact that most of them had no business serving as MPs in the first place, it sounds like they ended up in a gray zone with little oversight, or oversight that didn't care what they did to the prisoners, and combined with some of them being already screwed up in the head, you have the conditions for a large amount of homoerotic porn being produced.