Posted on 05/15/2004 2:13:26 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:21:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
"On March 19, 2004, President Bush asked, 'Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open?' Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management - U.S. management."
Unfortunately, because such slanderous nonsense was uttered by a senator with the magic "Kennedy" name, it's impossible to ignore - even if it comes straight from Michael Moore's playbook.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Why is it that the fat (understatement) old sot, cholesterol probably in the low 1000's, is still waddling on. You would think a stroke would shut his stupid mouth . Not since Molly Ivens have I thought this. Maybe it will happen again. HuMMMMMM/ Alittle help down here please.
The New York Post has had some great editorials lately! This is another -- good for them!
Kerrennedy, the Liberal Leftist Bloated Botox Beast from Massachussetts.
He didn't, and the way he phrased his response further burnishes his reputation as a smarmy elitist.
But I know what he's saying - and so do you."
C'mon John, I'm a dumba$$ from Texas...spell it out for me, you gutless simp!
I was thinking "Kennederry" ...
"I don't agree with the framing of that," Kerry said on Don Imus' radio show. "He's my friend, and I respect him enormously, but I don't agree with the framing of that."Framing? We don't care about no stinkin' framing! Just tell us whether or not you condemn the treasonous statements of your "friend".
Kerry's reply on "framing" reminded me of his comments on the Nick Berg murder. It was along the lines of how the terrorists showed a "failure of understanding" or something like that. I know it was a "failure of" something. I thought the use of the passive voice was illuminating-- as if the terrorists just had some kind of temporary moral short circuit. It really wasn't, to my mind, a very strongly worded condemnation. The murder was an act of pure unadulterated evil, and Kerry really didn't seem to want to put it that bluntly. Did anyone else react that way?
"Ted Kennedy went so far over the top on the Abu Ghraib affair this week that you've got to wonder whether his brains have - finally - fallen out"
No wondering there... hasn't has any brains for years. They fell out while deciding what to do about letting his secretary drown.
Edward Moore (Ted) Kennedy. Michael Moore. A coincidence? I think not.
Yes. It's exactly analogous to Carter's inability to call the Iranians barbarians during the hostage crisis.
The liberal left is drowning in its own collective guilt and multiculturalism. They have so enviserated moral right and wrong that they can no longer lead, can no longer distinguish between good and evil.
Like Nick Berg's father, these people do not get it.
You neither understand nor appreciate nuanced thinking, you peon. </sarcasm>
Of course, neither do I. :=)
You're right. I don't get no nuance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.