Posted on 05/18/2004 9:53:05 AM PDT by presidio9
As you may have heard, the Boston Globe published, as real, fake pictures purporting to show American soldiers in Iraq gang-raping Iraqi women. The pictures were actually from a porn website and were staged (not to make any political point, needless to add). The pictures were handed to the Globe by a Boston city councilman, of the Green Party, and a rabble-rouser from the Nation of Islam (the American "Black Muslim" group).
The Globe published this lame retraction:
"Editor's note: A photograph on page B2 yesterday did not meet Globe standards for publication. The photo portrayed Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner and activist Sadiki Kambon displaying graphic photographs that they claimed showed US soldiers raping Iraqi women. Although the photograph was reduced in size between editions to obscure visibility of the images on display, at no time did the photographs meet Globe standards. Images contained in the photograph were overly graphic, and the purported abuse portrayed had not been authenticated. The Globe apologizes for publishing the photo."
In other words, the main apology is for the sexually explicit nature of what they published. Secondarily, they apologize for the faked photos not having "been authenticated." What a mastery of understatement.
The Boston Globe is published by the New York Times Company. What consequences will befall the editors of the Globe? Probably a reprimand. And a wink.
Meanwhile, London's Daily Mirror has been similarly found guilty of publishing faked photos--in their case, photos of British troops abusing Iraqi prisoners. But the British still retain some sense of honor, so the editor of the paper, Piers Morgan, has been fired.
Thirty-seven years ago, Ayn Rand spoke on "The Wreckage of the Consensus" at the Ford Hall Forum. The talk included this passage:
"A country at war often resorts to smearing its enemy by spreading atrocity stories--a practice which a free, civilized country need not and should not resort to. A civilized country, with a free press, can let the facts speak for themselves. But what is the moral-intellectual state of a country that spreads smears and atrocity stories about itself ...?"
bump
What is treason . . .
bump for later
You're title says "NYTimes", yet the story is about the Boston Globe...
Never underestimate how stupid and gullible Americans can be. The sheeple, who rely on the media for EVERYTHING, are not getting the true picture and probably never will.
"A country at war often resorts to smearing its enemy by spreading atrocity stories--a practice which a free, civilized country need not and should not resort to. A civilized country, with a free press, can let the facts speak for themselves. But what is the moral-intellectual state of a country that spreads smears and atrocity stories about itself ...?"
NICE
which is owned by the NY Times, I was thinking the same thing until I noticed the one line in the article correlating the two.
When will the non-sheeple rise up?
I saw this picture
and I couldn't help wonder --
which of you is it?
You're right, and that is sad.
Great Graphic! LOL!
Have you heard from Gwenyth Paltrow's lawyer yet regarding your screen name?
Original title referred to the "New York Times Company" but I had to edit it down so that FR would accept the length.
Drop Registered a ping and tell him what a great graphic that is.
Please use it when we expose another lie/scam/spin hallucination of the lunatic mediots.
Great! That loggo goes very well with your tag line.
Good essay, lousy title.
Did you notice in the picture of the long haired hippy the stripes on the flag are guns & the stars are war planes? I don't think its any of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.