Your agruement...IMHO...would be like saying that Hitler houldn't be blamed for the Holocoust because he never personally killed a Jew at a Death Camp.
Don't mistake Rush's confidence for arrogance or cockiness.
Rush is confident because he stands behind what he says and time and evidence has born out most of what he has said to be true.
Kerry is arrogant. His lips are moving but there's no confience to his convictions, which change daily.
And if I remember correctly...even Karl Marx got his hands dirty in the Bolschlevik Revolution in 1917.
I said no such thing. Hitler was giving orders to carry out mass murder. Giving orders falls squarely into the category of carrying something out.
And if I remember correctly...even Karl Marx got his hands dirty in the Bolschlevik Revolution in 1917.
Karl Marx never carried out a genocide, he never ordered one, he never even suggested one. He just left things real vague about how we were supposed to get from our current state to the glorious socialist wonderland. Marx died in 1883, so you must be confusing him with Trotsky or something.
There is no comparison between what Marx advocated/did and what Hitler advocated/did.
And this gets back away from the point: no matter what Karl Marx did, "Communism" never did anything. If Communism killed millions of people, put Communism in jail!
Um...Karl Marx died in 1883.