"Surely, someone who holds your position is willing to engage in a point-by-point logical discussion aimed at pursuasion."
You are a poor deluded man. Your position is devoid of logic, so there is no purpose in arguing deluded points.
Your movement will fail. You will likely do damage to those that try to accomplish your goals within the framework of the Constitution.
You are simply wrong about America, but no argument will dissuade you.
I oppose you and everything you are doing, fortunately your movement does not deserve to be taken seriously, and I probably give it too much credit by even engaging in a dialog with you.
Ad hominem. Just the facts ma'am.
Your position is devoid of logic.
Projection. If what you wrote was true then you should be able to demonstrate how it is true using the laws of logic without the fallacies (ad hominem, etc.)...that is...if you understand the laws of logic.
Goodness, even I can think of reasons that you have not provided as to why secession might not be necessary or optional yet. Do I really need to help you make your argument???
Since you've yet to answer my question regarding why the American revolution was justified, I must infer that you simply have not thought your position through and therefore you're not prepared.
Your movement will fail. You will likely do damage to those that try to accomplish your goals within the framework of the Constitution.
Expressing you preference is not an adequate answer.
You are simply wrong about America, but no argument will dissuade you.
No argument has been offered by you...beyond an ad hominem fallacy along with other fallacies. I'm still waiting, Einstein.
I oppose you and everything you are doing...
Duh.
fortunately your movement does not deserve to be taken seriously...
Then why have you taken it so seriously as to spend so much time emoting about it without providing one sound reason against it?
...I probably give it too much credit by even engaging in a dialog with you.
I guess I should spare you. I probably should not have entered into an intellectual battle with an unarmed foe.