Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neoconservative Persuasion
Weekly Standard ^ | 2003 | Irving Kristol

Posted on 05/24/2004 4:42:38 PM PDT by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-454 next last
To: Veracious Poet
"I speak for myself..."

How can you be speaking for yourself? You claim we Conservatives who support the War on Terror are in the minority.

If you're speaking for yourself then you are the minority...but you claim we are. So what majority group are you speaking for Kerry Poet?

181 posted on 05/25/2004 11:32:36 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008

He had some sound ideas...for his time.


182 posted on 05/25/2004 11:34:02 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Kerry Poet?

What are you gonna say next, "It takes one to know one?"

Were done, you continue on with your childish rants if you wish, but I've already answered ALL of you questions.

VP Out


183 posted on 05/25/2004 11:35:34 AM PDT by Veracious Poet (Cash cows are sacred in America...GOT MILKED???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Veracious Poet
You haven't answered anything Kerry Poet...you skipped, twisted and still refuse to identify the majority anti-war group you represent...you know, the one that makes us Conservatives who support the War on Terror the minority.

What group is that other then the anti-war group so ably represented by your spirtual mates Michael Moore and Jim McDermott?

184 posted on 05/25/2004 11:38:11 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Veracious Poet
I guess we will just have to accept your avoidance of identifying your majority "kamp" as being nothing less then the only group that can come close to making Conservatives supporting the war a minority...the Michael Moore and Jim McDermott "kamp".

You do them proud.

185 posted on 05/25/2004 11:41:44 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

If you haven't seen it, don't bother...

The guys certifiably nuts.


186 posted on 05/25/2004 11:46:10 AM PDT by Veracious Poet (Cash cows are sacred in America...GOT MILKED???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

So stock exchanges are passe?


187 posted on 05/25/2004 11:46:29 AM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008
Not at all...but Hamilton would faint if faced with International exchanges that can transfer billions in an electronic second.

I never said I wasn't a Burr fan.

188 posted on 05/25/2004 11:52:42 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Veracious Poet

I don't think you can point it out.


189 posted on 05/25/2004 11:53:25 AM PDT by Petronski (They could choose between shame and war: Some chose shame, but got war anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Veracious Poet
So there Kerry Poet...ready to come clean on the majority anti-war "kamp" you speak for? Or are you content with simply being identified with the only anti-war "kamp" that could possibly out number Conservative Americans who support the war?

The Moore/McDermott/Streisand "kamp".

190 posted on 05/25/2004 11:54:35 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"If you haven't seen it, don't bother..."

He must be talking about his anti-war buddy Michael Moore's last film. He seems to like the current one just fine.

191 posted on 05/25/2004 11:56:32 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

interesting that you don't reveal where you stand on traditional conservative issues -- pro-life, tax cuts, racial quotas, conservative judges, gay marriage, immigration. Confirms my suspicion that your only issue is war in the middle east.


192 posted on 05/25/2004 11:58:34 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
QUESTION: Would you like to be a democrat, a Republican, or a Libertarian?"

NEOCON: "Yes!"
193 posted on 05/25/2004 11:59:15 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
QUESTION: Would you like to be a democrat, a Republican, or a Libertarian?"

NEOCON: "Yes!"
194 posted on 05/25/2004 11:59:29 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Interesting? Not at all, that is reserved for threads involving such issues...not for the likes of your usual defeatist threads.

I am sorry that someone did claim your were canadian however. I lost all respect for canada over the past several years...but even I wouldn't impose you on that pathetic bunch.

195 posted on 05/25/2004 12:01:26 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
QUESTION: What would you most like to be; a democrat, a Republican, or a Libertarian?"

NEOCON: "Yes!"
196 posted on 05/25/2004 12:02:29 PM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
The question for him should be, "Would you rather be a Quisling, a defeatist or a Chamberlain fan."

He'd take all three.

197 posted on 05/25/2004 12:02:37 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
you don't have any interest (at least that you make public) in pro-life, tax cuts, racial quotas, conservative judges, sanctity of marriage or the immigration mess - - and yet you have the gall to question my conservative commitment, when I've been posting on these issues for six years.

If it doesn't involve bloodshed in the middle east, you're not interested. But that doesn't make you a conservative, it just makes you some guy who is obsessed with the middle east.

198 posted on 05/25/2004 12:03:01 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Oooh, I see. Foreign antisemites denounce the role of da jooz in US foreign policy, ergo the role of jooz in US foreign policy creates openings for our enemies, ergo the jooz have too big a role in US foreign policy. Ergo, whatever foreign antisemites allege is true. Ergo, to understand everything we must become foreign antisemites. Brilliant. Such reasoning. Why hadn't we all thought of it before? Replace with any term you like and prove anything you like. All you need is one immoral enemy idiot anywhere in the world to agree.
199 posted on 05/25/2004 12:03:15 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Veracious Poet

So, I guess the obvious answer remains...you speak in sympathy and concert with that sweaty fat slob, the hero of your anti-war "kamp", Michael Moore.


200 posted on 05/25/2004 12:03:40 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson