Skip to comments.
Saddam's Files New evidence of a link between Iraq and al Qaeda.
Opinioon Journal ^
| May 27, 2004
Posted on 05/26/2004 9:23:04 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Texasforever
You make some good points. Bush could and should do all those things to make his case. After watching his speech live, I got the impression that he believes tremendously in what he is doing. He would probably continue fighting terrorism and fighting for a democratic Iraq even if the polls told him it would cost him the election. So what we have here is a President who puts the requirements for national security above the requirements for his own political stature. This is exactly the type of President we need during war time. It is exactly the opposite type of President that Bill CLinton was. He put his own political stature and his own carnal desires above the requirements for national security.
This could theoritically cost Bush the election, but he probably feels that what he has accomplished since 9/11 is well worth it. Quite frankly we all should feel better knowing we have a leader who puts the nations safety and security above his own political desires. And the facts are quite clear, since 9/11 we have not had one domestic plane hijacked by terrorists. And since Bush has put this country on the offensive, we have not sufferred a major domestic terrorist attack.
To: conshack
I'm looking at the right source of information - FreeRepublic, The New York Post and Fox News. I don't believe a word I read in the Slimes --- it represents tomorrow's DNC talking points today. They have been getting a free ride as the fishwrap of record for far too long.
I too am waiting for the day when the Slimes will have to eat crow. Especially since they just repudiated their pro-WMD and pro-Saddam 9/11 links articles yesterday. That will be sweet. And if the evidence is overwhelming enough, even the Slimes can't ignore it, I hope.
To: FairOpinion
He was shipped to Baghdad, where his leg was amputated.Just last week I remember reading a report that the Intel community no longer feels his leg was amputated - just seriously injured.
23
posted on
05/27/2004 5:05:28 AM PDT
by
Coop
(Freedom isn't free)
To: cyncooper
An excellent read. Thanks for the ping. Adding to my list.
24
posted on
05/27/2004 5:13:51 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Kaslin
bumpage for later readingage...
25
posted on
05/27/2004 6:51:34 AM PDT
by
sanchmo
To: sanchmo
Wouldn't it be funny that when the RATS unload their October suprise, the next morning at a nationally televised press conference, Bush announces that Bin Laden has been captured and that the link between Al Queada and Saddam has been established.
26
posted on
05/27/2004 7:10:21 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Only difference between the liberals and the Nazis is that the liberals love the Communists.)
To: swilhelm73
ABCCBSNBCCNNPMSNBC That's either a very funny typo or a very thought. :)
It wasn't new with me ... it's a RushLimaughism. MSNBC he has re-named: "PMSNBC." I think it applies quite well.
To: goodnesswins
I like how Rush refers to them....ABSNBSCBSMSNBSPBSCNNBS...Has anyone read Artimus Fowl? It's a kid's book, but there's a direct reference to EIB.
28
posted on
05/27/2004 8:39:01 AM PDT
by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: Kaslin
“Article of faith” is an excellent way to describe it. Anti-war liberals are galactically dishonest when they imply that had such a link been established, they would have actually supported the war.
It’s also noteworthy that nobody argues against the connection betwee nour guests at Gitmo and 9-11. Faced with incontrovertible evidence that these people are our mortal enemies, the left wants to coddle them and make sure they wake up every morning with a mint on their pillows.
An Saddam/Al Qaeda link is ultimately irrelevant to liberals, who live and breathe to hate Geroge Bush, traditional morals, and a non-globalist view of the world. Nobody should take them seriously when they demand evidence for anything. Such a response on our part is giving them far more credit than they deserve.
29
posted on
03/01/2008 7:13:09 PM PST
by
Remulac
(Evidence Doesn't Matter to Libbys)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson